User talk:Fireandice423

Pamella Bordes[edit]

Can you explain here exactly what your concerns are regarding that content in the article you keep removing? What exactly is untrue and what you believe to be potentially libelous? I need to know so I can take a look. Thanks - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:36, 22 March 2018 (UTC) yes i most certainly can explain. the paragraph that has been removed is entirely untrue. you can not just put in things without checking just because they have appeared in tabloid newspapers post the era of internet. this information is hog wash . it has never been proved and is libellous. please remove this information permanently. it is highly damaging to many people whose names have been mentioned.[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pamella Bordes— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pamella Bordes ‎[edit]

I notice that you haven't replied to Oshwah's question. Which, by the way, is also mine. You can read the policy on wp:biographies of living persons (BLP) and wp:Neutral point of view. Be careful, these are often misinterpreted.
I also undid your edit as you removed the references section and all the categories and made a mess of things. Jim1138 (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: Those sources are hardly tabloid journalism. Jim1138 (talk) 09:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pamella Bordes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, people will likely find out about stuff on the sources. Jim1138 (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Communication is required[edit]

Please discuss. Simply deleting the content is unlikely to get it removed. wp:communication is required. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pamella Bordes, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 11:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]