User talk:Ffeifanc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page ICarly do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NrDg 20:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas the Tank Engine and Friends merchandise. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Gwernol 18:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid the link was not there before you added it. Here is the edit you performed today: [1]. Notice that the additions you made are shown on the right in red. You added that link. The link is inappropriate, forums should not be linked to, they add nothing to the article: the purpose of that link appears to be to drive to that forum. Wikipedia is not here to provide traffic for any forum, least of all one you are apparently involved with. Thanks, Gwernol 20:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it was there on the 28th. December. Then it was rightly removed. It was replaced earlier today by an IP editor and again rightly removed. Then you replaced it once more in the edit I showed you above. That link is consistently removed because it is inappropriate.You have been previously warned not to add it back, yet you went ahead and put it back in again. Please don't do that again. Thanks, Gwernol 20:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]