User talk:Favonich

About my "vandelism" of List of Fist of the North Star episodes

You might want to take a good look at Wikipedia:Assume good faith before making a bold accusation and know what real vandalism is before accusing me of vandalizing an article that I CREATED IN THE FIRST PLACE and that I've been maintaining for a long time before you created your own account.

I was merely reducing the plot summary in order to reduce the article's size, which was getting ridiculously long at over 100kg (the standard limit is 30kg) and all of the plot summaries up to episode 49 were originally written by me in the first place, so I have every right to change them as I see fit. Additionally, you also reverted the official English titles used by Toei in the episodes they sell at Direct2Drive/Crunchyroll to the unofficial informal translations that were previously being used. If anyone could be accused of vandalism (or "vandelism" as you put it, for someone who supposedly has greater writing skills), its you.

I'm assuming you only called my edits "vandelism" because of your ignorance of Wikipedia's policy and what constitute "vandelism" rather than bad faith, so once again take your time and read Wikipedia:Assume good faith (as well as Wikipedia:Vandalism#What_is_not_vandalism) before you do another mistaken assumption like that. Thank you Jonny2x4 (talk) 04:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:God Save the Quean

First of all, why did you take so long to reply to a message I left on your user page months ago? Wouldn't it make more sense if you had wrote your reply back then?

Either way, how you personally definite what vandalism is irrelevant. If another person edit an article with the intent of improving it, even if its misguided, its not vandalism, period. Yes, I do tend to make grammatical and spelling mistakes in my edits, but its nothing that can't be fixed by another editor or myself. Also, don't accuse someone of having a "moment of arrogance" when you're basically doing the same thing by stating that Wikipedia's definition of their concepts are different from yours.

I wasn't removing anything from the article, but was simply trying compress the summaries as much as possible. For starters, Wikipedia discourages articles with too much plot summary. Not every piece of information and trivia is suitable for Wikipedia, even if the information is technically correct (see WP:NOT). In other words, deleting information is not vandalism if the information is considered superfluous by Wikipedia's standards (which most plot summaries are). Jonny2x4 (talk) 03:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)