User talk:Falls Orangeman

AE sanctions[edit]

The Falls Road, Belfast article is currently subject to Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/The_Troubles#Final_remedies_for_AE_case, as laid out during a previous WP:AE case that closed October 05, 2008. If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first.

All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, the Baronetcies, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR. When in doubt, assume it is related.--Domer48_'fenian' 17:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Falls Road, Belfast appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.--Domer48_'fenian' 17:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 17:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement thread[edit]

There is a report on the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard regarding your editing conduct. PhilKnight (talk) 15:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Falls Road, Belfast. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. BigDunc^Talk 22:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Falls Road, Belfast, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. O Fenian (talk) 16:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI[edit]

I have raised your disruptive editing here BigDunc^Talk 16:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive edits and soapboxing at Falls Road, Belfast. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will much shorten this block if you agree to stop. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

warning[edit]

Straight off your block, you have carried on with soapboxing. This is not on here. If you would like to add reliably sourced commentary about a strong PoV on this topic, that's very welcome, but you cannot add your own PoV spin and tone to the narrative text, which is meant to be neutral. If you do this again, I'll block you again and for even longer. Gwen Gale (talk) 10:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Falls Road, Belfast. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 18:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Falls Road, Belfast. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. O Fenian (talk) 17:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rigsy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mo ainm~Talk 18:59, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rigsy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rigsy was changed by Falls Orangeman (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-04-11T01:24:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:24, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]