User talk:Ewr27/Shipibo language

Bibliography[edit]

Hi Eric, thanks for your work --- it seems to me that you didn't quite understand one aspect of the assignment, which was "to build a bibliography of at least ten relevant items (ideally more)." The Glottolog link on your page leads to a bibliography of 259 items, many of which are in English and will be valuable resources for your research into this language. Please check them out so that you can get as much information on your language. Chuck Haberl (talk) 19:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Final Review[edit]

Hi Eric, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:

Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
Structure: The structure does not follow the template but at least it follows its own logic. 4 points.
Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
Accuracy: Most of the claims are supported by references. There are only five scholarly references used, however, and most of the citations derive from two of them. 3 points.
Relevance: The information is for the most part relevant. 5 points.
Length: Word count 1458/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 4 points.

The final score is 26/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 22:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]