User talk:Evenprime

Welcome!

Hello, Evenprime, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather 21:12, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Geo Storm article[edit]

Hello, I noticed you left me a message on my talk page about the Geo Storm article, so I'll go ahead and speak. Anyway, the reason why I tagged it was because it doesn't seem to be organized quite well. A table like the ones I have been adding to stubs recently would help. You can try copy-pasting the table from the Dodge Spirit article to the Storm article and add any necessary information. For example, I think the "Dimensions" section would work better if the actual dimensions were posted on a table instead of a separate section. Also, treat the article as if it were going to be entered in a printed encyclopedia. After all, Wikipedia IS an encyclopedia, right? Hope this helps! --ApolloBoy 00:26, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I just looked over it, and I think you fixed it up enough, so I removed the cleanup tag. By the way, I didn't create the Dodge Spirit article. --ApolloBoy 06:50, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Autocross + FF[edit]

I was just making observations based on national results, the winners in most stock classes (except A stock) are dominated by FF type cars, like the Integra, Celica, and Mini Cooper S. I'll re-word it so it doesn't say preferred.. Something like 'perform well'? Morwan 11:54, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I liked the "fairly popular" that you went with. Some classes (e.g. H-stock) are almost entirely FF, so naturally the winners are FF. That doesn't mean FF is the best way to go, just that it is a common, inexpensive layout. Evenprime 15:51, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Geo Storm[edit]

That article looks great, one of the best rookie efforts I've seen. With a little more work it could be a Featured Article. One problem is that it is very vague on geography. The article never says where the car was sold, and statements like "they are still fairly common in the used car market" need to be specified, as they probably don't apply to the entire world. I would also consider dumping Image:1993geostorm.jpg, the article has a number of good free use pictures, so there is no reason to keep a somewhat dubious fair use one. - SimonP 15:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the input.  I'll try to get some geography info, and I will loose the commercial picture as soon as I get an equivalent one for that model year.

Image copyright problem with Image:Asept05-33.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Asept05-33.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Zsinj^Talk 00:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GeoStorm table[edit]

For the images, pick the ones that best illustrate what is being said in the text (ie. whatever the modifications were on). As for the table, consider something like this. That table is just a result of copy&pasting from another article. It may work out good or it may not. It is just an idea to consider. --maclean25 20:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geo Storm Images[edit]

did you take those pictures in the Geo Storm article? Their copyright status is the only thing holding it back from becoming featured. --Karrmann

All the images except one are ones I took. My dad took the one of me driving with the wheel off the ground. (I had another autocross picture in the article - one I took of my dad autocrossing the same car - but removed it because apolloboy said there was too much motorsports emphasis.) Tell me how to set the copywrite on these pictures so it is no longer a problem.... Evenprime 03:30, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing up those issues, Evenprime. It's too bad that it seemed to happen too late for the FA to happen -- I would have been happy to change my vote once that problem was solved.--Bcrowell 01:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure it is too late? The page is still a candidate? Evenprime 17:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats[edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		I hereby award you the original barnstar for your contributions to the Geo Storm article. Karrmann 01:11, 10 March 2006 (UTC) Karrmann[reply]

Put this on your Userpage! --Karrmann

Thank you! I will continue trying to improve it. I've added a table to the year to year changes section, and will be taking more photos to finish it out.

Geo Storm FAC[edit]

I noticed you got the Geo Storm up as a FAC again, so here is a step by step process of what to do.

1. ~~Add the tag to the talk page~~ you've already done that 2. now here. I already blanked that page. Add to it the reason why you think it should be featured. 3. add this

((Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Geo Storm))

to the top of the list on this article and you will be good to go!

If you need further assistance, fell free to PM me! --Karrmann

Andrews University referencing[edit]

Please note that the ref/note format for referencing has been discontinued in favour of the more advanced <ref> and <references/> tags. Cheers, Ans e ll Review my progress! 23:17, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Notification[edit]

Hello! I noticed that you have interacted with user:Staxringold who is currently undergoing an RfA and thought that you might be interested in participating at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Staxringold 2. You have received this message without the endorsement of the candidate involved, and this is not a solicitation of support, it is only an effort to make RfA discussions better (for more information see user:ShortJason/Publicity). Thank you in advance for your participation. ShortJason 19:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gerardo Bonilla[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gerardo Bonilla, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gerardo Bonilla is a test page.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gerardo Bonilla, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:1992StormFront.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1992StormFront.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need input on Article[edit]

I need your help on this article for Amazing Discoveries....https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazing_Discoveries as it needs work to keep it from being deleted from Wikipedia. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Simbagraphix (talk)

Also if could get your input on this related article for Walter Veith....https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Veith

....Thanks.Simbagraphix (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sport Compact Car[edit]

The article Sport Compact Car has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Search turned up no independent RS. Only a few blog and forum posts.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Theredproject (talk) 09:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of British autocross[edit]

The article British autocross has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Synthesis of ideas; autocross in the UK does not seem substantially different than anywhere else

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of British autocross for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article British autocross is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British autocross until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autocross (disambiguation)[edit]

The article Autocross (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page containing only see also entries and previously redirects to the primary topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]