User talk:ErinHowarth/Archive

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Please feel free to leave me a message.

Fanny Alger

I will make specific edits later --Trödel 21:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

September Six

Here is my memory from the news reports in Utah:

Lynne Kanavel Whitesides - teaching doctrine contrary to the church
Avraham Gileadi -
Paul Toscano - can't remember - though his writings often challenge priesthood authority
Maxine Hanks - supposedly for writing Women and Authority: Re-emerging Mormon Feminism
Lavina Fielding Anderson -
D. Michael Quinn - --Trödel 23:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Footnotes

YW - you may want to use {{subst:reference}} (copy and paste the text) - it will automatically include the following text in the article:

== References ==
<!-- ----------------------------------------------------------
  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes for a 
  discussion of different citation methods and how to generate 
  footnotes using the <ref>, </ref> and  <reference /> tags
----------------------------------------------------------- -->
<div class="references-small">
<references />
</div>

The cite templates also (generally) use APA guidelines I believer rather than the Harvard style, just as an FYI. I use Citation templates as a guide --Trödel 12:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Merging with Articles

I have looked at the Blacks and the Priesthood, Blacks and the LDS Church, Blacks and Mormonism, Blacks and Whatever, and I commend you on your efforts to clean things up, so I hope you can get all these various articles merged into something more consise and reasonable. Good luck. Bytebear 19:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Blacks and Mormonism references

I noticed that your newly entered references were reverted by Wrp103; I suspect because they were not in proper format. Could you please go back and renter the references properly; they are needed. Thanks, Storm Rider ^(talk) 15:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Academy Awards#New Awards

Link: Academy Awards#New Awards

Huh. I don't know how you did this! But when I just tried to remove the {{sprotected}} template from the Academy Awards page, it wouldn't let me, saying there was an external link to a blacklisted site in the article. I had a poke, and it turns out that suite101.com is blacklisted. Would it trouble you terribly to find different references for your info? Once again, I have no idea how the spam filter caught me, but not you :) Feel free to continue this discussion on Talk:Academy Awards. Cheers, – riana_dzasta 08:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Mormonism and history merge proposal

Please weigh in on the merger proposal between History of the Latter Day Saint movement and Mormonism and history. I saw that you were a recent contributor of one of the pages in question, and thought you would be interested.--Descartes1979 (talk) 21:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk:80th Academy Awards nominees and winners

Hello. I replied to several of your posts at the article's talk page: Talk:80th Academy Awards nominees and winners. Hopefully, I have answered your questions there. And, thanks for contributing to the discussions there. However, I do have an important question for you. Please reply at my Talk Page ... located here ----> User Talk:Joseph A. Spadaro ... so that I will be sure not to miss it. I am curious as to why, when you replied to my post, you went in and edited the words of my original posting? That's a big no-no, as far as I know. I had noticed that when you replied to my posts at the Talk Page for the Academy Awards 80th ceremony. I scanned through my own post ... to see exactly the point that I made that you were responding to. (So that I could respond back in an informed way.) So, I went back to review my own original post / my own original words. And I noticed some typo's and some changes / edits and some wording that differed from how I originally submitted the post. When I went in and looked at the edit log, it shows that you went in and edited my words. I was just confused by this ... and was curious why you would do that? As I said, that is a big no-no. Please remember that, after you make edits, the original poster's name is still "signed" to that post. So, it hardly seems fair, right, or even ethical to change someone's words (for reasons good, bad, or indifferent) ... but yet to keep the original signature on the newly edited post. I am very confused by these actions and I am wondering if you can clear up your motivation, intent, and objectives for me. Many thanks. Please reply at my Talk Page: User Talk:Joseph A. Spadaro. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 20:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC))

Indus valley article

Hi - I see you have removed text from this article without leaving an edit summary. Could you please explain why you've done this as I don't understand what was wrong with it.--Doug Weller (talk) 07:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Ashley Bryan

Thanks for working on the Ashley Bryan article. I don't know if this is useful but I found this article that has his picture [1] Einbierbitte (talk) 22:13, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

This is a great article, thanks! --ErinHowarth (talk) 05:26, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Taekwondo of America Association

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Taekwondo of America Association, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Lacking reliable and verifiable sources to establish notability of an organization.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. tedder (talk) 05:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

More on Ashley Bryan

You may be interested in this article Einbierbitte (talk) 17:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

List of Grand Masters of Taekwondo

I recently came across List of Grand Masters of Taekwondo, which you created on 24 June 2009. I think there are tremendous difficulties with trying to produce such an article on Wikipedia, due to: (1) the very political nature of awarding of high ranks in martial art organisations; (2) variation in the criteria for 9th Dan ranking from organisation to organisation; and (3) bearing in mind the first two points, the issue that not all 'grand masters' necessarily hold 9th Dan ranking. Also, as far as I am aware, most Tae Kwon-Do organisations do not even have a 10th Dan rank—which typically indicates a Japanese system rather than a Korean system. Based on all of these points, and the discussion on the article so far, I had been planning to nominate the article for deletion. I do think, however, that it might be possible to revise the article rather than put it under consideration for deletion. If you agree with my criticisms (which are intended to be constructive, but which I appreciate you might not agree with), would you be willing to contribute to revising the article? Please reply here if you are happy to respond (I will monitor your talk page for a while). Thanks. Janggeom (talk) 14:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

I agree with your assessment. I began the article when I read about the first woman to receive a 9th dan rank from the kukkiwon. The kukkiwon seemed to me to be solid organization, and I did not anticipate so much trouble when I went looking for a list of practioners with a 9th dan rank. I expected to find quite a short list, actually. I tried to be very careful about the individuals that I listed, and I thought I had created a format that others could follow which included lots of dates for authenticity. The contributors which have followed me have not really followed my format. I'm not at all happy with the current page. I think the project requires original research (which will most likely be conducted in Korean), but if you think the article can be saved, I would love to keep working on it. I just don't really know where to go from here. -ErinHowarth (talk) 00:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. I can now better understand your original aims in creating the article (which I have looked through again). On considering it some more, I think that the List of Grand Masters of Taekwondo article might be less salvageable than I first thought, simply because the scope of the article is going to be large and contentious. At this point, and bearing in mind that I am just one fellow contributor, I might suggest: (1) you could start an article on the 9th Dan lady (since she is what sparked your interest in the first place, and presumably a valuable article could be written about her, as she seems notable); (2) if you would like to transfer some of the information in the List of Grand Masters of Taekwondo to somewhere else (e.g., your own notes on your computer, for later reinsertion into Wikipedia), that you do so; and (3) I nominate the List of Grand Masters of Taekwondo article for deletion (due to numerous issues as noted above, none of which was something either of us has control over). If you are interested in the pioneers of Tae Kwon-Do, you might like to see Original masters of taekwondo, which I created and am working on. Trust these ideas might be of help. Janggeom (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot to add that while thinking about this article, I did think that it would be interesting and useful to have an article on the pioneers of Tae Kwon-Do in each country. These would be the people (both Korean and non-Korean) who were primarily responsible for introducing the martial art of Tae Kwon-Do across the world. If there could be a workable definition of what constitutes a 'pioneer of Tae Kwon-Do' then I think such an article could be feasible. It would certainly be worth further discussion, such as at the WPMA discussion page. Just a brief thought. Janggeom (talk) 02:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I like your ideas very much. Here's a question I've been contemplating while reading about the development of taekwondo that might be appropriate for you pioneer article: how did the governments of North and South Korea encourage people to leave Korea and go teach taekwondo all over the world? These people seem to have been sent out as cultural ambassadors or something, and I wonder if the government issue grants or something to help them get started. -ErinHowarth (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

I believe the earliest Tae Kwon-Do masters from South Korea would all have gone out to other countries following military orders, and would have been funded by the South Korean government. I am not aware of the North Korean government being involved. Janggeom (talk) 23:55, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Grand Masters of Taekwondo

I have nominated List of Grand Masters of Taekwondo, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Grand Masters of Taekwondo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Janggeom (talk) 02:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Glee talk pages

Erin, it is really inappropriate for you to be asking questions about what's happening to the characters on their talk pages. That's not what they're there for. If you want to know, the places to look are the individual episode articles for the season so far; if you don't know the titles, check the Glee (season 4) page. A quick summary: Puck's in California, Santana seems to have taken the cheerleading scholarship in Louisville, Mercedes is also in California and Mike's in Chicago and both will appear in episode 5 (airing November 8), Finn shows up in New York after his army adventure, and Tina's a senior at McKinley. To forestall additional questions, Quinn's presumably at Yale and will be appearing even later this fall, Rachel and Kurt are in New York and roomies, and everyone else who was in New Directions still is except for Rory, who has disappeared without a trace or a mention, and may or may not be returning. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:27, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

In season 3 (in Heart), Rory said he will be returning to Ireland at the end of the schoolyear (he says he has been informed that his visa for a second year at McKinley has been denied). So thats where he is now. 150elias (talk) 07:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it is almost certainly true that he's back in Ireland, but it was strongly implied in that episode that he'd lied about the visa denial to gain Sugar's sympathy and thus become her date. Whether it subsequently became the truth has not yet been revealed, and may never be. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:25, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

All of the pages where I left messages included story lines for the characters, but no one had added anything about Season 4. As a reader, I feel this is an oversight worth correcting. As an editor, I believe that pointing out such oversights on the talk pages is a most appropriate course of action. -ErinHowarth (talk) 21:22, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

But that isn't what you asked, or even what you pointed out. It was simply, "Where is Puck at the start of Season 4?" If you had directly asked why there weren't any fourth season updates, the matter would have been very different.

The lack of an update wasn't an oversight, but stems from two things: It usually isn't worth updating character articles every couple of episodes, and there aren't nearly as many people working on Glee character articles as there used to be, so editors for these articles are thin on the ground. In the case of Mercedes, Mike, and Finn, there wasn't anything to report at all (storylines only include info from broadcast episodes, not speculation), and Santana had only had a ten-second scene in the very recent second episode. In fact, not much has happened with any of the five graduates you queried. The one McKinley student, Tina, maybe, but only in the first episode. In the second episode she at least gets to sing; in the third she's way in the background. I gather that you're not watching the show? BlueMoonset (talk) 22:25, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar! -Mr. Absurd (talk) 00:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Fate of the unlearned

You edited this page a while back and discussed your lack of approval over the Protestant section. I've revised it a bit, mostly just adding the bottom paragraph, but I thought you might find it interesting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.195.66.164 (talk) 01:13, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you -ErinHowarth (talk) 16:38, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

You're invited! Women's History Month Edit-a-Thon at the University of Oregon

Saturday, March 9 - Women's History Month Edit-a-Thon at the University of Oregon - You are invited!

Come celebrate Women's History Month at the University of Oregon in Eugene, Oregon, on March 9! This event, facilitated by WikiWoman Sarah Stierch, is hosted by the Fembot, in collaboration with ASOU Women's Center, the Center for the Study of Women in Society, the School of Journalism and Communication, and the UO Libraries.

Please bring your laptop and be prepared to edit about women and women's history!

The event is March 9, from 1-4 PM, at the University of Oregon Library.

You must RSVP here - see you there! SarahStierch (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of AILA awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

I found the right Thomas King. Thanks for letting me know, you helpful little robot, you. -ErinHowarth (talk) 16:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride

You are invited! Wiki Loves Pride

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride, a global campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia during the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. The project is being spearheaded by two organizers with roots in the Pacific Northwest. Meetups are being organized in some cities, or you can participate remotely. Wikimedia Commons will also be hosting an LGBT-related photo challenge.

In Portland, there are two ways to contribute. One is a photography campaign called "Pride PDX", for pictures related to LGBT culture and history. The Wiki Loves Pride edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, June 21 from noon–4pm at Smith Memorial Student Union, Room 236 at Portland State University. Prior Wikipedia editing is not required; assistance will be available the day of the event. Attendees should bring their own laptops and cords.

Feel free to showcase your work here!

If you have any questions, please leave a message here. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Oregon-related events and projects by removing your name from this list.

Feminist+Queer Art Wikipedia Edit-a-thon: Saturday, September 13, Portland, Oregon

You are invited to the Feminist+Queer Art Wikipedia Edit-a-thon, to be held on Saturday, September 13, 2014 from noon–4pm at the Independent Publishing Resource Center (IPRC), located at 1001 SE Division (97202).

Prior Wikipedia editing is not required; assistance will be available the day of the event. Attendees should bring their own laptops and power cords. Female editors are particularly encouraged to attend, but all are welcome. Hope to see you there!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the talk page.
You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Oregon-related events and projects by removing your name from this list.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon, Portland Oregon (March 7, 2015)

You are invited!

Saturday, March 7: Art+Feminism – noon to 5pm
Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at the Portland Art Museum's Crumpacker Family Library (Mark Building, 2nd Floor; 1219 SW Park Avenue). Art+Feminism is a campaign to improve coverage of women and the arts on Wikipedia. No Wikipedia editing experience necessary; as needed throughout the event, tutoring will be provided for Wikipedia newcomers. Female editors are particularly encouraged to attend. Attendees should bring their own laptops and power cords.

Hope you can make it! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please let me know.

Thanks,

Another Believer

To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list. -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia Women's Health Information Edit-a-thon: Tuesday, May 12 at OHSU

You are invited!

Tuesday, May 12, 2015: Wikipedia Women's Health Information Edit-a-thon – 1 to 4pm
Wikipedia Edit-a-thon hosted by OHSU's Center for Women's Health in honor of National Women's Health Week
Location: Biomedical Information Communications Center (3280 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239)
This edit-a-thon is intended to address some of these important differences and to generally improve women’s health information in key articles and topics. Areas for improvement have been identified in cooperation with WikiProject Medicine. Prior Wikipedia editing is not required; assistance will be available the day of the event. Attendees should bring their own laptops and power cords.

Hope you can make it! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please post to the event page.

Thanks,

Another Believer

To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Upcoming Art+Feminism events in Oregon

You are invited to participate in Oregon's upcoming Art+Feminism events, which will be held in Portland and Eugene on Saturday, March 5, 2016. Please see the following links for additional information, or to sign up:

Portland: Yale Union (800 SE 10th Avenue), 12:00–5:00pm
Eugene: Architecture and Allied Arts (A&AA) Library (200 Lawrence Hall, University of Oregon), 12:00–5:00pm

About Art+Feminism: Art+Feminism is pleased to announce its third annual Wikipedia edit-a-thon, an all-day event designed to generate coverage of women and the arts on Wikipedia and encourage female editorship. Last year, over 1,500 participants at more than 75 events around the world participated in the second annual campaign, resulting in the creation of nearly 400 new pages and significant improvements to 500 articles on Wikipedia. For more information, see Art+Feminism.

You received this message because you have attended a Wikipedia meetup in Oregon or contributed to WikiProject Oregon. To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list. -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TaekwondoPictogram2012.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TaekwondoPictogram2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TaekwondoPictogram2004.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TaekwondoPictogram2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ErinHowarth. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:Lego games has been nominated for discussion

Category:Lego games, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lordtobi (✉) 22:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Art+Feminism @ Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (March 18, 2017)

You are invited to the upcoming Art+Feminism edit-athon, which will be held at the Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (415 Southwest 10th Avenue #300, Portland 97205) on Saturday, March 18, 2017 from 10:00am – 5:00pm. For more information, visit Eventbrite.

Hope to see you there! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon @ PNCA Library (April 29, 2017)

You are invited to the upcoming Art+Feminism edit-athon, which will be held at the Pacific Northwest College of Art (PNCA) Library at 511 NW Broadway on Saturday, April 29, 2017, from 11am to 4pm. For more information, visit the Facebook event page.

Hope to see you there! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride at PNCA: Tuesday, June 27

You are invited to the upcoming Wiki Loves Pride edit-athon, which will be held at the Pacific Northwest College of Art (511 NW Broadway) on Tuesday, June 27, 2017, from 5–8pm. For more information, visit the meetup page or Facebook event page.

Hope to see you there! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Upcoming Wikipedia edit-a-thon dedicated to artists of color - Thursday, Oct. 26 at PNCA

On Thursday, October 26, a Wikipedia edit-a-thon dedicated to artists of color will be held from 4–8pm at the Pacific Northwest College of Art (511 NW Broadway). Learn more at Facebook. Hope to see you there! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ErinHowarth. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.