User talk:Emmyzen

License tagging for Image:Emmywist04 044.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Emmywist04 044.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Summer06france_058.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Summer06france_058.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Society for Existential Analysis[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Society for Existential Analysis, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.existentialanalysis.co.uk/page2.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have also placed a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest notice on that page. This is similar to the one which you will have seen on the Emmy van Deurzen page. There is also an argument for adding one to the New school of psychotherapy and counseling page. AllyD (talk) 19:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Emmy van Deurzen[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Emmy van Deurzen, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmy van Deurzen. Thank you. Philip Cross (talk) 21:06, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Emmyzen! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Digby Tantam - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Existential counselling, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 20:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've also reverted your edit yesterday which added websites associated with Emmy van Deurzen into the text of the Existentialism article. I also note the edits to Positive psychology. AllyD (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of New school of psychotherapy and counseling[edit]

The article New school of psychotherapy and counseling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long-term article lacking reliable 3rd party references that demonstrate that it meets the Notability guidelines, despite having been flagged for 3 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 23:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emmy van Deurzen[edit]

The article Emmy van Deurzen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:PROF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC) SmartSE (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emmy van Deurzen for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emmy van Deurzen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmy van Deurzen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]