User talk:Egull

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Enclave/Exclave[edit]

You recently added Bibb County, GA to the List of enclaves and exclaves. I tried to verify this, but I could not. Do you have more information about it, like a map source or a placename? --Lasunncty (talk) 23:44, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hi friend probably more than you really want to wade thru but its all here http://bibbmonroebattle.com/ best egull

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Quadripoint has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 19:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing sources[edit]

Hi Egull, this is certainly not a demand, but could I ask that you spend some time reading up on how to cite sources? And since that's a pretty long page, specifically using cite templates? For instance, your addition here references USGS No. 13 but doesn't give a page number, so you put up a pretty big barrier for anyone else wishing to verify your source. In contrast. {{cite book}} lets you list the publisher, title, date and page number, which makes things very easy for the next person to read the article. It's not mandatory but it's always nice to see people taking an interest in how well articles are presented for the general reader - so if you can look at it, appreciated. You may have problems figuring out how the cite templates work, what I do is to temporarily put a {{reflist}} template at the bottom of the section while I'm previewing so I can see if I got the format right. Often I remember to take the test {{reflist}} out before I save too, but not always. :) Just a suggestion. Sometimes I just copy another template in the article and change all the fields too. Also, as you may have noticed in my removal, we can't use Wikipedia articles as sources for other Wikipedia articles. We're not really considered a "reliable source". :) Franamax (talk) 21:24, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you dear cocreator for taking the care to help me improve with this

as you probably already realize i am rather slow to move & learn

& am admittedly far too improvisational as a result

will do my best tho with what ive got & your help & understandingEgull (talk) 22:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Quadripoint with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pi (Talk to me! ) 00:53, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Humanism. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Rostz (talk) 04:40, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the source you suggested (http://www.abraham-hicks.com/lawofattractionsource/index.php) would not considered a reliable source; please see WP:RS for guidance. Rostz (talk) 14:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


You might have a point, I'm working [slowly] on redoing the maps and I'll include that in my research. Thanks! --Golbez (talk) 17:11, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quadripoint, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Centre, Independencia and Ouest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Egull. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Egull. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Extreme points of Earth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cayambe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]