User talk:Ebram16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Concern regarding Draft:Bishop Mina[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ebram16. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bishop Mina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bishop Mina[edit]

Hello, Ebram16. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bishop Mina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:15, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Imbaba church[edit]

Hey, if you actually know where the Imbaba church is, can you take a look at Talk:Giza church fire? I think I have it off of google maps but if you know for certain that would be helpful. nableezy - 19:13, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

lists[edit]

Hi. I see you wrongly reverted my edit to Dioceses of the Coptic Orthodox Church and you were yourself reverted, too. First, each article on Wikipedia has to pass notability criteria. While you might see articles that fail to meet thus rule, it does not give you permission to ignore our rule. Standalone lists have to pass WP:LISTN or WP:NLIST. Further, you want to avoid edit warring over a particular version of an article, regardless of what you think the merits of your case are. Finally, you focus on improving extant article rather than creating new ones. Established editors like myself could point you in the right direction; you have no business assuming you know better. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]