User talk:Eastlygod

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Eastlygod! I am Farosdaughter, and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I noticed that you recently created an article which was deleted. Please don't be disheartened but please remember we are here to build an enclyclopedia, not be nonsensical. Have a very belated welcome and some cookies! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Farosdaughter 21:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

.

I'm sorry =( I don't see the big fuss about a page with a genuine meaning. if we remove the attack, can we keep the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haidoor (talk • contribs) 23:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re page "Remember to rewind"[edit]

I removed the speedy tag from Remember to Rewind. It said patent nonsense, but the page was not patent nonsense. See WP:CSD#G1. There may be some other criterion under which it can be deleted. --Coppertwig (talk) 03:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SurveyEngine[edit]

This entry on the popular econometric software was deleted without any arbitration at all. Meanwhile the worthy list of big bust pornstars is kept. Seriously guys - who appoints the editors here. Can someone dig up the article and replace it.

Thanks for your reply - unfortunately once an article is deleted its pretty hard to follow what actually happened. Can you help me ressurrect the article - sorry about the big but pornstar jibe ... but you know how it is when you're frustrated and mad.

Lárus List[edit]

Hi, could you consider withdrawing your speedy deletion request as per the references for notability now provided? TreveX^talk 03:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect[edit]

Thanks!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordy Why Have You Foresaken Me (talk • contribs) 08:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DS PSP War[edit]

thankyou for the help, I am working to make the most articles as possible and as good as possible I would appriciate the help on the page--Kingrock (talk) 13:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, in response to your comment at the talk page, I have started the AfD discussion on the article (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DS PSP War). —C.Fred (talk) 13:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the update is that the article wont be deleted but we only have a little over five days to make it as good as possible, I'm goin to need as much help as possible and please feel free so that if you do help me sign your name so people will know we worked togther--Kingrock (talk) 14:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake[edit]

The article is still alive it was just moved to Nintendo DS vs. PlayStation Portable console war --Kingrock (talk) 02:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bea'rism[edit]

I removed the speedy tage because the definition of patent nonsense is as follows:

Total nonsense, i.e., text or random characters that have no assignable meaning at all. This includes sequences such as "rtmhtyhjjflbhjoglhjgblvjh\[\\\\98kjt9ykbitiof,kkc", in which keys of the keyboard have been pressed with no regard for what is typed.
Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever.

Neologisms are most certainly meaningful and sensible. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 15:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. IT's a common misconception, but a stickler of an admin will not delete with an improper cat. I changed to {{db-test}} for the user's first article. It also provides a notification so they can read and reconsider their subject matter. Slippery? Maybe... - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense tags[edit]

Actually prior to a few of the edits, that page was nonsense, with very little content in there. Nonsense is hard to describe, although you are right, perhaps little or no content might be a better suggestion. I really wish there was a CSD tag for articles that "Obviously are a joke, but don't fit any other criteria" :-) Wildthing61476 (talk) 14:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's the time I'd just ignore the rules and use some common sense. Most of the admins realize that I'd think. Wildthing61476 (talk) 14:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Thoroughbreds[edit]

I went back and added a couple of (referenced)lines for notability. Not sure if that will help. Someone else removed the speedy deletion tag Limasbravo (talk) 16:23, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Minnesota Thoroughbreds[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Minnesota Thoroughbreds, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minnesota Thoroughbreds. Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PSN[edit]

It had that tag because before it was known the same on as, PSN, but now redirects to PlayStation Network, thats why it wasent on the disambiguation page. Fall en An gel 22:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No prob ;) Fall en An gel 22:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

International goals[edit]

Thanks for your message. I've seen it discussed before here at WP:FOOTY, where the international goals sections seem to have not been approved of. But you could certainly open a new discussion about the topic. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Europa League[edit]

The note that was added was factually incorrect. The note said that the berth would be awarded to the 6th place finisher in the Premier League if Manchester United qualify for the Champions League. That's not true. Manchester United could finish 5th and qualify for the Europa League play-off round. In that case the berth could be awarded to the 6th or 7th placed team depending on who wins the FA Cup. The fact is that there are too many permutations to convey effectively. The simplest thing is to say that Manchester United are eligable to play in the Europa League next season, which is a factually accurate statement that encompases all other possibilities. If Manchester United win the freaking quintuple, the validity of that statement remains, though obviously Manchester United would elect to defend their Champions League crown. I also think that if we add a note for Manchester United, then we should add one for every cup winner, as the validity of the note for every club wouldn't change as long as you substitute "cup winner" for Manchester United and change "6th place" to whatever place is applicable. A note that is applicable for 50+ teams is unnecessary. The fact is, it is a well known fact that if you qualify for Europe twice, you're obviously going to take the berth that gets you into the furthest stage of the more prestegious competition. This level of explanation is unnecessary. Also, please refrain from characterizing your position as having not even been addressed. At numerous points I questioned the need of a note in addition to the need to include Manchester United in the article. -- Grant .Alpaugh 23:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your comments, and have no personal animosity towards you at all. I fear that you mistook my comments as being about you, and not Kingjeff (talk · contribs), with whom I've had some history dating back more than a year if memory serves. Anyway, I strongly disagree with your position about the article, but that is life, and I look forward to discussing the issue in the future. I also look forward to working with you in a way that is in keeping with the spirit of the project for quite some time to come. Have a good one. -- Grant .Alpaugh 23:48, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm KGV. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Geoff Shreeves because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! KillaGorillaV (Talk) 03:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]