User talk:EIC

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EIC for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ttonyb (talk) 14:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry. (blocked by –MuZemike 00:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

As Confirmed by CheckUser. –MuZemike 00:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EIC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry I did not know that I can not vote in AfD without making changes to the article itself.

Decline reason:

You were blocked for creating multiple accounts in an attempt to sway concensus on an AFD. The usage of multiple accounts, also called sockpuppeting, is explicitly forbidden on Wikipedia, especially if these sockpuppets are used for disruption. Your unblock request doesn't deal with this issue. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 12:26, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.