User talk:E-Practice Editors

Egovernment[edit]

If you are closely associated with a topic, you should read WP:AUTO and WP:SPAM. If you still feel my decision was incorrect you are welcome to request undeletion. I will be back here in a moment with a link for you. SGGH ^speak! 11:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion review. There you go, I'll review the article myself and see if I come to a different conclusion. SGGH ^speak! 11:41, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The main issue is simply that I took it to be a self-published article with promotion problems, WP:AUTO still does apply, but I think I can restore the first article if I tinker with a couple of sentences. SGGH ^speak! 12:42, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the article, and have made changes which bring it closer to the ideal style of article. I apologise for the hasty deletion where clearly with some tinkering by an experienced editor the article could be made suitable. It still needs work, and WP:AUTO issues may still crop up (and also your username may be an issue in the future if you read WP:U) but I have tagged the article for the main issues. Thanks for your patience. SGGH ^speak! 12:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:E-Practice Editors[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:E-Practice Editors, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

User Page used inappropriately

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:User:E-Practice Editors|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fiendian Reptiloid, Demon (talk) 06:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:E-Practice Editors[edit]

User:E-Practice Editors, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:E-Practice Editors and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:E-Practice Editors during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Blueboy 96 20:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]