User talk:Dwaipayanc/Archive 16

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 5	29 January 2007	About the Signpost

Foundation names advisory board, new hires	Court decisions citing Wikipedia proliferate
Microsoft approach to improving articles opens can of worms	WikiWorld comic: "Hyperthymesia"
News and notes: Investigation board deprecated, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!!

Thank you very much. --Nirajrm ^{talk ||| sign plz!} 13:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Portal

I can see that you are spending very little time in Wikipedia. I am not the person to take charge of a portal, simply because I am not yet tuned to high quality articles for FA and so on. I am still tuned to high volume. Changing articles and photographs from time to time is not a big job, but the stocks are extremely limited. Biographies – may be, I will be able to do something but not with selected articles. And photos are just not there. I can get on with the portal to some extent but then without your putting in efforts, it would just become stationary. Please have a look at Legendary personalities in Bengal. I have not entered it for DYK because I have put in a similar one – Gobindram Mitter. Regards. -- P.K.Niyogi 15:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for your response. I also had some reservation about the title but could not come up with a better one. There is scope for expansion of the article with more examples but the danger lies in people inserting insignifacnt material. I had read somewhere a rhyme about Haji Mohd. Mohsin, but I cannot locate it at present. I have been working in improving and standardising the entries about towns in West Bengal. When you have the time, you can just have a look - Bandel, Antpur... It is nothing great, just making the pages respectable. At one point of time, you spent a lot of time in starting some of the pages. -- P.K.Niyogi 23:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for reminding to Booleanfalse...

Hi, Thanks for reminding to booleanfalse to ask the question. --Nirajrm ^{talk ||| sign plz!} 21:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Zoo

Alipore Zoological Gardens is on the main page. Have a look. Regards. -- P.K.Niyogi 01:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

satyajit

a bot recently changed the spelling of satyajit in bangla by replacing "khanda to" by "to". DO u know if this is according to some legit wikipedia guideline?--ppm 23:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Picking up on old conversation

Hi there... Please refer to my email of a few months back. Any change of mind? — Lost^(talk) 07:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Novels newsletter : Issue IX - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 6	5 February 2007	About the Signpost

Foundation organizational changes enacted	Group of arbitrators makes public statement about IRC
AstroTurf PR firm discovered astroturfing	WikiWorld comic: "Clabbers"
News and notes: More legal citations, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Delhi FAC

Is their not a minimum time after a failed fac?--Blacksun 11:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

INCOTW

You voted for Harbhajan Singh, this week's Indian Collaboration of the Week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. - Aksi_great (talk) 14:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Hoysala architecture

Hi. I have this in peer review now. The auto peer review adviced I add a "box" appropriate for the topic. Do you know of any. The "Previous country box" used for Empires/Kingdoms is not accepted.ThanksDineshkannambadi 16:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

My RFA

Thank You, Dwaipayanc/Archive 16 for your Support! Thank you for your support in my RfA, which closed at 111 / 1 / 2. I am humbled and rather shocked to see such kind comments and for it to reach WP:100. Please feel free to leave a note if I have made a mistake or if you need anything, I will start out slow and tackle the harder work once I get accustomed to the tools. Thank you once more, I simply cannot express in words my gratitude.

...fly on littlewing. ~ Arjun 19:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi!

Hi Dwaipayan! I hang around a lot of India-related articles, so I've definitely seen you around, doing all sorts of good work :) Thanks for dropping in, and for the message, much appreciated! Hope to see you around even more in the future. Cheers, riana_dzasta 14:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

By the way, I just realised that you're Bengali, too - always nice to meet another one, especially when you live OS! :) riana_dzasta 14:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Born in Aus, but I moved to India when I was 8, and lived there for 5 years (Calcutta). I come across WB-related articles on NPP sometimes, but I rarely contribute (more of a mopper than a writer, sadly!) But Portal:West Bengal looks interesting - I rather like portals, so I might see if I can push this one through to featured status! Doesn't look like it needs much more, really... riana_dzasta 14:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Automatic update, do you mean like this? This is the portal I helped get to featured status; if you click 'show new selections' it, well, shows new selections :) It's wonderful that the news is updated so regularly, kudos to you and P Niyogi. I think it needs very little work. If you wish I can set up the automatic randomisation, but more pictures are definitely needed - portals should be pretty visual, IMO. I'll have a look around for pics; let me know how you feel about the automatic randomisation! riana_dzasta 14:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

OK, I'll get working on it now :) riana_dzasta 14:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey Dwaipayan, I started work on sorting the articles into subpages to get the randomisation up, but it's very late (or early) where I am, so I should turn in. Just a few quick things to note before I go to bed, though, to avoid duplication of content on the main portal page...

• FAs shouldn't be used as selected biographies; for example, Rabindranath Tagore should only be used as a selected article.
• Any pictures which are being used in the selected article/biography shouldn't be used as selected pictures - so I'm inclined not to support Image:Darjeeling.jpg as a selected pic. Also, since it's a panorama, it looks messy when it is used as a selected pic, as it leaves too much space next to it.

That's all I can think of now! I don't know what the statistics would be like for two images/articles showing up together due to the randomisation, but you can bet it will happen somewhere (these things always do!), so those are 2 suggestions I can offer. Does that sound OK?

I'll probably see your reply in the morning/afternoon, so sorry if it seems like I'm being lazy about replying :) Take care, and thanks for letting me work on this! riana_dzasta 15:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

No, Dwaipayan, I can't think of anything else right now. Just the lack of images, but we'll try our best (even 10 or so will do for now). I'll keep going with sorting stuff out. Take care! riana_dzasta 08:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello

Hello. I'm well, if a bit over-worked, currently working on Conatus, which I hope to have made an FA by April... thanks for asking! -- Rmrfstar 17:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi (Reply)

Just dropped in to say hi! How are you?--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Dwaipayan! Thanks for dropping in. I'm doing okay (very busy in real life^TM). Very nice work with the West Bengal portal. It should have a star soon! =D Cheers, S.D. ¿п? § 21:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and here's a link to my goals for 2007. Happy editing! S.D. ¿п? § 21:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Portal

Thanks for your message. Otherwise, I would have been taken by surprise. I still don’t have a hang of these featured portals and articles but I suppose they are good status symbols. It is good if some one is helping to improve the West Bengal portal. For sometime now I have been busy mostly on the town pages. You may not have noticed that all transfers from Ganeshbot sandbox was completed for West Bengal about a month back. Thereafter, I transferred a lot of material for Jharkhand, Bihar, Orissa and Assam. In fact, transfers for Jharkhand is also complete. I find that Ganeshk has gone by the census data but that leaves out many important towns, including subdivisional HQs, assembly constituency centres and new development centres. Therefore, I have been adding these – not just a line or two, but at least some information. It is listed in Wikipedia:Notice board for India-related topics/It's new. That work is continuing. I will keep watch on the portal changes. Sorry for the long message. With regards. -- P.K.Niyogi 02:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Dwaipayan, the easiest way, in my opinion, to randomize featured articles and selected pictures is to use {{Random portal component}}. Cheers! S.D. ¿п? § 14:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I might need you to {{db-author}} some subpages that we don't need now, because I'm getting confused with all of them! :) I'll make you a list of the ones we don't need... riana_dzasta 14:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

West Bengal (Portal)

Hello, Dwaipayan! Riana and I have done some work on the portal, adding randomizing templates and such. Do you think Portal:West Bengal/Selected article removal candidates is needed? Also, here's a list of subpages of the portal that are not needed:

Happy editing, S.D. ¿п? § 16:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

No worries Dwaipayan, I think we're both enjoying ourselves :) By the way, you have lots of nice images in your commons account that could be used on the portal! Cheers, riana_dzasta 22:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

The Portal

Thanks, but I really haven't done anything except delete a lot of unneeded pages. Cheers! ~ Arjun 19:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay I have restored the archives. Cheers! ~ Arjun 19:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

No prob, just doing my job. Let me know if you need anything else, however I am going offline now. ~ Arjun 19:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Dwaipayan, I've removed the Did you know archive links since I've randomized the Did you know section using {{Random subpage}}. Comments? Cheers, S.D. ¿п? § 00:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and I've also made a navigation page that I've transcluded on all related subpages of the portal, Portal:West Bengal/Navigation. Happy editing, S.D. ¿п? § 00:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Hehe, no, I like portals :) There are definitely a lot of Indian portals which need very little work to get up to featured status, so it would be fun to work on them. riana_dzasta 06:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I have some ideas for selected articles:

• Durga Puja
• Bengali cuisine
• Howrah Bridge

Also, if you don't mind, I'd like to add more selected pictures without going through the SPC process and pass the current SPC's since the portal needs at least 20 SP's. Cheers! S.D. ¿п? § 13:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[Reset] Hi! Howrah Bridge, though a smaller article, could be a good candidate for selected article, as it can be provided with references and inline citations (hopefully). On the other hand, both Durga Puja and Bengali cuisine lack good references, and are absolutely deficient in inline citations, though both articles sounds comprehensive. Howrah Bridge may have some problems regarding comprehensiveness. Let's put those as candidates.

Regarding direct promotion to selected pictures, I don't have any problems. But will it be ok once the portal is up for featured candidacy? I dont have much idea, but someone may tell that images were not selected by nomination procedure. Already we have the whole biography section which has not been chosen by nomination procedure.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

If you would like to do it, please nominate several articles for the portal's selected articles. Regarding the selected pictures, I think we could put the selected pictures on the candidates page using the layout Riana created (and without created a separate subpage). If no one object by, say, Friday, we'll put them into the portal. Also, regarding selected biographies, I don't think s nomination process is necessary until the portal becomes featured. Does that sound good to you? :D Cheers Dwaipayan. S.D. ¿п? § 23:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I personally would prefer if we renamed the entire 'selected articles' section to 'featured articles', as that appears to be standard portal procedure. That might take some time, though... I think only featured articles should be used on the front page. riana_dzasta 23:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, for making Cooch Behar a selected article on the WB Portal. -Amartyabag —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.0.142.173 (talk) 16:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC).

Delhi

Sorry to be so slow in responding; I've been very busy, and am trying to avoid engaging too many FACs, as I've got a lot of pending travel on the horizon. I'll have a look now; I already saw there is mention of image issues. Can you please ping Jkelly (talk · contribs) and ask him to have a look? There's some big new deal from the Wiki Foundation about Fair Use on images that I really don't understand, so I'll hesitate to support any article until its images are cleared by someone who understands the Fair Use issues. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

• Websources in references section needs last access dates, {{Seealso}} belongs at the top of each section per WP:GTL, and that See also template at the bottom of the article is a killer—is there a way to shorten it or make it more visually pleasing? I will read the article on Wednesday, when I have more free time. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

A proposal

Any thoughts? Cheers, riana_dzasta 05:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 7	12 February 2007	About the Signpost

US government agencies discovered editing	Comment prompts discussion of Wikimedia's financial situation
Board recapitulates licensing policy principles	WikiWorld comic: "Extreme ironing"
News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

West Bengal portal

Hello, Dwaipayan! Riana and I have been worked hard on the portal, and we think that it's ready for a nomination for featured portal status now. I have created a subpage for the nomination. Please give your nomination there when you can and transclude the subpage on the main page after you're finished. Happy editing! S.D. ¿п? § 12:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

It's a great job done and the portal now looks modern and sleek. You start off the nomination and then we will follow. I think we will have to awaken up many people. Regards-- P.K.Niyogi 13:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

OK! :) riana_dzasta 17:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Oh, and I left my support at the page :) Cheers, riana_dzasta 17:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I've stumbled across it before, but never taken part. Your last question is going to keep me up all night, now... I thought it was AJC Bose too, but apparently not. Hmmm... riana_dzasta 17:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I've replied to your post. That was a great edit summary, garmagaram! Cheers, S.D. ¿п? § 01:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I have informed a number of people to have a look. I hope they do. There is a suggestion about the biographies and I feel that we can fix a limit to the summary size, so that it comes within a fixed space. We can take the size of say Megnad Saha summary and fix the others accordingly. I can try and they you can see the result. There are not many biographies as of now. It won't be a great job. Regards-- P.K.Niyogi 04:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:Delhi FAC

I may lend a hand tomorrow. PS I was referring to the first field in the infobox that stated Districts(s) : Delhi =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't know too much of the criteria for featuring a portal, so will recuse myself. =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		In recognition of all the tireless and prolific work you have done on Wikipedia, especially to India-related content.--thunderboltz(Deepu) 07:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations on Delhi, your latest FA!--thunderboltz^(Deepu) 07:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Been busy with this and that. The West Bengal portal is looking real neat now. Good luck at WP:FPCAN. I hope to get the Kerala portal there, but we're lacking in content to put on the portal. There are just 9 selected articles and 5 or so selected pics. :-( --thunderboltz^(Deepu) 07:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC)