User talk:NewTestLeper79/Archive 20

Paul Hayes (antiques 'expert')[edit]

Hi. However refreshing and hilarious I find it be patronised be one with the word 'dude' in their regular vocabulary, ultimately it would be humiliating. Enjoy your hobby. Goodnight.

Adrian Messenger (talk) 10:21, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here.

Mary had a little lamb?[edit]

Is incorrect the info about the Simpsons and Halloween III???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.50.193.167 (talk) 17:46, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You remove my edit[edit]

But you choose not to remove Arcayne's opinion which makes neither head nor tail. Please in the future, just leave my edits alone ok? Anoderate1 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 12:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Nah. Anyway, I've removed it again. - Dudesleeper / Talk 23:26, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, just stop editing my edits, see WP:TPG Yours, Anoderate1 (talk) 14:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to have to insist that you do not refactor the posts of others in the article discussion pages. It isn't warranted, as the post was neither an attack nor of an uncivil nature. Please consider this a warning to stop, and instead discuss your reasoning for doing so. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 17:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing/striking your post on my talk. My post here wasn't intended as a bitch-slap, and I am sorry if you considered it such. AS for my block log, you will note that its pretty much in the past, and yeah - I do know what I am talking about when I speak about unpleasantness; I've been a dick at times, and learned more from it than others. I wanted to offer you the advice I wish I had gotten more of. Have a good evening.

Blackpool F.C. season articles[edit]

Hey man, I was just wondering if you thought it might be a good idea to sort each of the articles in Category:Blackpool F.C. seasons by the season, rather than by the club's name. I have already made the change to Blackpool F.C. season 2007–08, but I should only do the one as it would save you the trouble of changing them all back if you didn't think it was a good idea. That said, I can't see why you wouldn't agree with the proposal. Also, I'm not sure that the use of the Blackpool logo in the club's season articles really constitutes Fair Use, so they should probably be removed. – Pee Jay 16:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have a point there, but as you can see by Category:Manchester United F.C. seasons, there would only be one break in the list, caused by the change from the 2nd millennium to the 3rd millennium. Nevertheless, it's up to you. – Pee Jay 20:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, I do things as and when I find them. Otherwise I'd just be making unnecessary work for myself. – Pee Jay 20:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested that the re-sorting of the articles be done by a bot, as I don't know how to do it with AWB. – Pee Jay 23:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Blackpool manager circus[edit]

Hey, this afternoon the Blackpool Gazette have reported that Karl Oyston has told Parkes and Thompson that one of them needs to be in charge with the other his assistant. Also in Oystons interview on Tangerine World (on the clubs official site) Oyston was talking up Steve Thompson and it's looking likely that he will be given the post with Parkes as assistant at some point this week. Even if of course Leeds and Grayson do come back trying to entice either or both of them to Yorkshire soon. I'll keep an eye out see what happens! Such fun being a Blackpool fan! Merry Christmas and all that.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 16:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

R.E.M.[edit]

Sorry I know I should have finished all the singles before saving it, but is there any problem with putting the singles in it? Will (talk) 11:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll put it back in and fingers crossed it should be ok! Will (talk) 14:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{Footballer-unknown-status}}[edit]

Hi Dudesleeper - the template listed above, which you have worked on, was taken to WP:SFD as being too similar to stub templates and therefore easily confused with them. General consensus was that it should be kept (and wasn't really within SFD's scope anyway), but should be reworked to look less like a stub template and more like other cleanup templates. I've done that - please feel free to tweak it further if you wish. Given its new appearance, I'd recommend it be placed at the top of the page along with other similar cleanup templates, not at the bottom with stub templates (I've said as much on a new /doc file I made for it. See Gradimir Crnogorac for an example of how it now looks in action. Cheers, Grutness...wha? 00:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Grayson[edit]

Hi. My edit to Simon Grayson was not because I question the importance of his 3 years at Blackpool. I do, however, fail to see the usefulness of a graph with only 3 points. Dancarney (talk) 09:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

West ham hooliganism editor[edit]

What could be a better reference than a police report in an impartial and public legal hearing? I notice the same article references opinionated journalistic articles, which are accepted as references simply because they may be found online over an official document which is on public record and available on request from the relevant and named council. Familiarity does not make things superior, and please do not be so quick to undo such valid, informative and well referenced edits. I will check back here for your reply, as I do not have a user account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.106.50.229 (talk) 23:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure there is other unsourced information, but yours is the one I saw. Plus, yours is a little more than just He is a gud footballer, or the like. - Dudesleeper / Talk 00:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"again, you can't state something like that without providing a verifiable source" This is a true, unbiased statement reflected in government reports available to the public. It is not a matter based on opinion. Please clarify in what sense this isn't verifiable! I understand that it isn't verifiable by you at midnight on a Wednesday evening, but it is nonetheless verifiable, sourced and accurate. If you're going to make claims about untruth of public information, shouldn't you investigate before rejecting? Otherwise it's just laziness. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.106.50.229 (talk) 00:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might as well write because it says so here in my magazine, such is the usefulness of the reference. Please read this when you get a chance. And apparently it isn't just me who has reverted your edits. - Dudesleeper / Talk 01:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Since you class a magazine as equal to a government report, but seem to credit public tabloid press, we have sourced a news report which corroborates the story. This report is almost certainly based on the original reference given, but it is of course your right to demand your information from a second hand source. Perhaps this makes for a more interesting specualative life. As the reference fits in with your limited and ill-reasoned criteria, I have reinstated the information we originally submitted. Thank you for your officiousness. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.15.59.193 (talk) 01:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's speculative, by the way. Thought I'd correct you since this seems to be the basis of your edits. - Dudesleeper / Talk 08:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see at last that you have stopped supressing information, but note with interest that you prefer a gutter-press article to an authoritative government report to the extent of deleting the latter from the article. It's clear your expertise lies in being a football fan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.15.59.193 (talk) 11:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment! Most worthwhile thing you've said yet... - Dudesleeper / Talk 19:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dunoon[edit]

Re: your revert of my edit on Dunoon. I've reverted it back. Reason being, the incident in question was (although sadly devastating for the families involved) a simple RTA (Road Traffic Accident). Accidents (unless of major incident proportions) do not belong in an encyclopedia, which is what Wikipedia is I thought. If you feel you disagree, I work in the emergency services here and I could give you a list of RTA's, in and around the area, that would fill out the page considerably. No, one-car accidents do not belong in an encyclopedia, hence they are 'un-encyclopedic'.

See section 5 here> What Wikipedia is not

scancoaches (talk) 09:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I must disagree strongly on this. The gentleman in question was not a public figure so his death is not encyclopedia worthy. It may not have been a 'run-of-the-mill' RTA as you say, but it was a single vehicle RTA all the same. Here in Dunoon it was front page news in the local paper one week then its all but been forgotten about (those involved aside). As I say, I work in the emergency services here in Dunoon itself and theres RTA's here every week, including fatals and most of these are not 'run-of-the-mill'.

Someone looking up Dunoon in Wikipedia is looking for information on the town, they don't need to know that a car crashed a year ago and someone died. This kind of thing (and much worse) happens in every city in the world every day, its not worthy of wikipedia though. It was news at the time. Its now time to move on...

I suggest a opinion count on the Dunoon talk page if you disagree scancoaches (talk) 12:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the BBC reported it on their website does not make it anymore noteworthy. A search of the BBC website finds other fatal RTA's in the area. No single vehicle RTA should be in an encyclopedia.

Quote from the same Wikipedia Notability section that you mentioned:

"Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute evidence of sufficient notability. The Wikimedia project Wikinews covers topics of present news coverage."

scancoaches (talk) 13:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, same quote from 'Notability Section.

"Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute evidence of sufficient notability. The Wikimedia project Wikinews covers topics of present news coverage."

scancoaches

All of this category involve major incidents OR well known 'victims', not a single vehicle RTA that had a 'short burst' of news reports at the time. As I also mentioned, a search of the BBC news website reports other fatal accidents in and around Dunoon, should we include those too? scancoaches (talk) 14:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise, I can't for the life of me understand why you think that a single vehicle, one casualty RTA is noteworthy for inclusion in an encyclopedic article about a small town in Scotland. I only have one reasoning and that is that it's not 'noteworthy' as per What Wikipedia is not, section 5 'News Report'.

Dudesleeper, I've always found your edits on my home town of Dunoon to be both worthwhile and constructive but I can't see the reasoning behind inclusion of this short paragraph. If you feel the need, then please do put it up for discussion on the Dunoon talk page. Like you, I will happily bow to consensus rather than another person's personal opinion. scancoaches (talk) 15:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

West Lancashire derby[edit]

As you've presumably seen I've added an infobox to the article. On the Superclásico article, the infobox contains two images with an image of the match from each stadium. I was just wondering if you have any images of the match from either Bloomfield Road or Deepdale that could be used in the infobox? Thanks.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 16:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ali Mathlouthi[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ali Mathlouthi, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ali Mathlouthi seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ali Mathlouthi, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I've deleted this as meeting WP:CSD. You may want to carefully review Wikipedia:Your first article.

For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion

If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.

If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:NewTestLeper79/Archive 20/test.

Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim 14:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Spencer's parents[edit]

Hi there,

I've recently started a discussion to attempt to reach a consensus on Jesse Spencer's parents and how they should, or should not, be included in his article. As a recent contributor to the article on this issue, I'd welcome your opinion. Feel free to add it at Talk:Jesse Spencer#Parents. Thanks! --Ged UK (talk) 09:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Mathlouthi[edit]

I've restored it - the article showed that he'd played for both Strasbourg and Châteauroux, so I've no idea why it was tagged for speedy deletion. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 09:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nottingham Forest F.C.[edit]

I would like to ask why you deleted the section I added in the intoduction to the Nottingham Forest page about the club's nicknames. I have noticed that other clubs' atticles include this information in their introductions, such as Aston Villa (which incidentally is a featured article and therefore sets the standard for other articles).

In addition, it is apparent that you keep deleting the 'Tricky Trees' nickname from the article. I would like to stress that this is a Forest nickname because the Forest logo is known as and was designed as the 'Tricky Tree'. In fact, the club has also named a branch of their Young Supporters' Club 'The Tricky Reds' (a play on the two nicknames) as a result of this.

I trust that this nickname will not be removed again.

User:Nottmlad (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the information that you referred to in your reply but the category is NICKNAME(S) not NICKNAME. If what you are stating is correct, then surely the vast majority of football club articles are incorrect, including Blackpool FC. Perhaps you should focus on correcting this if you persist in 'amending' the Nottingham Forest article.

Surely Forest is simply an abbreviation of Nottingham Forest and not a nickname? If this follows, then surely the only correct nickname for Derby County would be Derby (rather than The Rams), for Manchester United, simply United or Man U (rather than The Red Devils) and, for Aston Villa, simply Villa (rather than The Villans).

If the Blackpool article can contain 'Pool, The Seasiders and The Tangerines why can't the Forest article contain The Tricky Trees?

Thanks. Nottmlad (talk) 17:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Green (footballer)[edit]

Probably will have added detail on this guys career at Port Vale when you read this. The article you wrote shows no sign of him after 1967 which is when a John Green (formerly of Blackpool, Tranmere, Vancouver City and Stockton Heath) joined Vale (September). He moved on to a player-manager position at a non-league club in 1971 so I can only assume they are the same man. However please check.--EchetusXe (talk) 23:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

?[edit]

I have not the faintest clue as to what you are speaking of. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbfenian1916 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You probably could have stopped after clue. - Dudesleeper / Talk 01:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dudesleeper, I accidentally blocked your account (I was in the middle of digging through the above user's contribs, and accidentally clicked the block button on your name without realizing my mistake). I immediately unblocked you, but your IP address may be autoblocked for a short period. I hope you accept my humble apology. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 01:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are still 8 (eight) hours remaining on the autoblock. Not sure that can be classed as short. I accept it was a mistake on your behalf, but you don't seem to have done much to rectify the situation. - Dudesleeper / Talk 11:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I had checked the block last night, and it said neither your account or IP was still blocked; I assumed everything was in order. Perhaps there was a glitch somewhere. My apologies. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 13:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock cleared

Request handled by: Step hen 12:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fylde Football League[edit]

Thats an odd one and a league I've never heard of, so will check. I missed that other user removing your message! doh.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 21:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alex John-Baptiste[edit]

I've been wondering about his article as it is located at Alex Baptiste, which he is generally known as, but his full correct name is Alex John-Baptiste and the lead gives his full correct name first. Do you think it should be at his full name with Alex Baptiste as a redirect or not?--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 20:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll create Alex John-Baptiste as a redirect then.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 03:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Message[edit]

Hello, NewTestLeper79. You have new messages at Addshore's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 20:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

a shearer[edit]

if you just revert my edits it is not going to help! why dont you like my edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Off2riorob (talk • contribs)

For starters, because minute is spelled minit, and Campbell is spelled Cambell. - Dudesleeper / Talk 04:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well you should have could have corrected the spelling if you spotted it!

You're actually quite the comedian. Had me chuckling there! Now stop it: you're supposed to be one of those annoying types. - Dudesleeper / Talk 04:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

chuckling ..good! when I think back to that match I remember beckham getting sent off .. the disallowed goal right at the end and losing at penalties ...beatty being the one at the death...and thats about all... so I think it is worth entry. I am going back to bed and you can revert .. vert or invert anything you like. regards. (Off2riorob (talk) 04:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]

List of notable Blackpool F.C. players[edit]

As it is a list I've not contributed to I thought I should check with you about adding Shaun Barker (who is on 123 league appearances), also Ian Evatt is now on 106 in total (combining his initial loan spell which then became permanent). Should they both be added?--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 23:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bombs[edit]

Not aggressively but for curiosity I ask why you thought mention of the four explosions not worth keeping in the London Underground article. The event bracketing the significantly named Kings Cross (some foreign supporter of the action claimed panic (which in fact did not overcome the population) "in the North, in the East, in the South and in the West") clearly had an anti-British, anti-Christian meaning in the minds of the organisers. Doesn't it warrant (not "deserve") a WP mention and a tie-in in that article?--SilasW (talk) 12:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remember me?[edit]

Hi. I'm the moron who engaged you in a edit war years ago about Joe Anyon and Mark Goodlad, because I did not know any guidelines and thought you were just deliberatly deleting my contributions. I've just been looking at my early contributions, and reading the very idiotic stuff I wrote, I want to apologise. A bit late, but I guess this calls for WP:TROUT :) cf38^talk 20:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - we're all newbies at some point. I've noticed your contributions around the place but hadn't put two and two together. I guess you've come a long way. Keep it up. - Dudesleeper / Talk 22:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dude, have a nice day :) cf38^talk 08:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BFC Hall of Fame[edit]

As you will have seen I've started adding details about the Hall of Fame to each players article that is in it. Do you think I am adding it in the right way, just adding it onto a section, or would it perhaps be more appropriate to create a new section on each article for it? What do you think? Thanks.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 21:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA 09[edit]

Haha, that's a good result. I do think that FIFA makes it a bit easy for lower teams to beat the big teams. What difficulty level are you playing on? – Pee Jay 00:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

image -> file[edit]

Thanks for that, that one passed me by. Wikipedia's help etc is APPALLINGLY difficult to find guidelines etc. SimonTrew (talk) 09:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eamonn Collins (footballer)[edit]

I'm currently working up an article on Collins (see my sandbox), who, in 1980, played for Blackpool before his 15th birthday. Presumably this was some sort of record - are you able to point me in the right direction for sources? This article [1] says he "stepped into the shoes of Stanley Matthews". What record did he claim? Any pointers/help would be gratefully appreciated. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've now created the article - do you think that his record should be included under Blackpool F.C. records and/or in the Blackpool F.C. season 1980–81 article? --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisim[edit]

I am going to ask you not to keep reverting Australia soccer articles to simply "football". The agreed term is football (soccer). It has been discussed and agreed on here: [[2]]. If you persist on reverting, I will report it as vandalisim. You have been warned —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.0.121 (talk) 23:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Manual of Style somewhat trumps the talk pages of Wikipedia, but thanks for the link to the... interesting discussion. I'm fine with you adding/leaving in "soccer" on Aussie-centric articles, but Miller's is not this. - Dudesleeper / Talk 00:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ronaldo[edit]

I'm currently working up improving Ronaldo (including sourcing most of the article as well). The problem seems to be Paulozin and reverting back. I'm not even sure the user speaks English, as I have looked at his talk page and his contributions and he doesn't seem to like summarizing his edits. Not to say I have a problem with speaking another language, but it poses a problem in trying to communicate. Dcstorm097 (talk) 15:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:2008-10 - Camden 011.jpg[edit]

File:2008-10 - Camden 011.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Camden ME aerial 2008.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Camden ME aerial 2008.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ocean Ave, K'port 2.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Kennybunkport Ocean Ave.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image-2004-12-03 - Kennebunkport (1).jpg is now available as Commons:File:Kennebunkport South Congregational Church 2004-12-03.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2004-12-03 - Kennebunkport (8).jpg is now available as Commons:File:Kennebunkport Dock Square.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Percy Thorpe[edit]

I believe I have filled in the gaps there.--EchetusXe (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I Got You Babe Sabrina The Teenage Witch[edit]

How come you took off Sabrina The Teenage Witch in the I Got You Babe Article? It did happen on that show. HannahMiley Talk

For the reasons I gave in the edit summary. - Dudesleeper / Talk 18:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So I just have to make it shorter? HannahMiley Talk

What does Copyvio mean? Is it the same thing as Copyright? Just wondering. HannahMiley Talk.

What do you mean by Grammar Murder? HannahMiley Talk.

Is Commons[edit]

File:Thorntonpitch.jpg is on the Commons. No point in trying to delete it here. (But it is quite witty.) — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sportklub Schwadorf.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Sportklub Schwadorf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I noticed you edited Kinnoull Primary School and decided to check out your userpage. I'm also interested in architecture and have Scottish ancestry. Still, thanks for editing the article. Feel free to sign my guestbook! Ross Rhodes (T C) ^Sign! 21:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Alan Ball (Blackpool).jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Alan Ball (Blackpool).jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 21:01, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nobend[edit]

All hail Charlie Adam. Instant hero time! (And the one match I had to miss too....)--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 14:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

You just reverted my edits, I really thought/think you are a GAWA supporter. I mean your a rangers supporter right could you please give an explanation Applytheneed1 (talk) 19:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{Rangers F.C. seasons}}[edit]

I've had this out before with Peejay, but here it is again. Here's how that template looks on my display. The weird "alignment" thing that it's got going on only works with specific font metrics, namely those of the default Microsoft Windows web fonts, and looks highly odd elsewhere. Rather than adding lots of extra markup so that the template has a subjectively prettier appearance on Windows, we should use the standard formatting which is used on every other navbox on the project (which also conveniently displays correctly if the template is widened). Making our templates less parochial will make it easier for outsiders to use and edit them, and we should be striving to do so wherever we can. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GolfAuthority says what?[edit]

What articles do you claim that I own all are wikipedia's, and can be edited by anyone including you Dudesleeper! Talk to me on my talk page, and don't be vague please when writing a comment to users! Have a nice day!GOLFAUTHORITY 21:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So... you have evidence to the contrary that Owen Knapp did not make a guest appearance on the pilot episode of Saved By The Bell, or you just don't think that it's worthy of inclusion? 24.148.29.17 (talk) 17:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are options three and four that the link pointed to a non-existent article and that being an extra isn't notable anyway? - Dudesleeper / Talk 19:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

House[edit]

Hi, you appear to be one of the main contributors to the House article. I will take it to FAc somewhere next week, if you have any comments on the article before it's nominated, please notify me. Thanks.--Music26/11 15:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments such as, "The show's title is House MD, so why is the article still at House (TV series)?"? - Dudesleeper / Talk 16:38, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, see these discussions ([3], [4]). I'd personally prefer it if the page would remain "House", because, at is it is mentioned in the first discussion, in certain parts of Europe, the show is known as "Dr. House", so calling the page "House" would be more central. House, md, redirects here so it's not really a problem. If there are a lot of people on your side who would like to move the page, I have no problem with it being moved. But I guess we'll see that at the FAc.--Music26/11 20:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bighorn/Bridges/Sherwood[edit]

Hey Dudesleeper! I hope your not to sleepy to improve this article created by me! Please, use your wikisense to make this better with any edits you can think of! Have a Dude-da-Dude-da Day!GOLFAUTHORITY 04:38, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, I'm well known for my golf-related editing... - Dudesleeper / Talk 23:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coisty[edit]

Call me a cheeky bastard, but is this picture really self-made? It looks a lot like one of those random images pulled from a webpage and given the wrong license. What's the story here? Either way, there's duplication at File:Coisty.jpg . Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits) 02:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here. - Dudesleeper / Talk 22:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coisty.jpg, it's on wikipedia only. Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)^{Calling All Athletics Fans!} 02:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:St. John's church, Calder Vale.jpg[edit]

File:St. John's church, Calder Vale.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:St. John's church, Calder Vale.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:St. John's church, Calder Vale.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Harvey (footballer)[edit]

Thanks for correcting that, I'm not sure how that happened :/ 000Clifton ian000 07:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the barnstar[edit]

000Clifton ian000 09:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Luton Town F.C. peer review[edit]

I'm gearing Luton Town up for FAC, and so it's on peer review at present. Your comments would be very much appreciated, if forthcoming.

Cheers, Cliftonian • talk 17:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking/Proposed decision[edit]

Hello Dudesleeper. This is just a quick note to inform you that you have been mentioned in the above proposed decision so you might wish to take a look at it. Regards, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 22:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The words oh, dear, how and sad spring to mind. - Dudesleeper / Talk 23:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Mathers image[edit]

Hi, I just reverted your edit, because the image is a free image from a non-copyrighted trailer. It was only after I'd done this that I realized it's the third time you've done so. Are you disagreeing that it's a free image, or have you not looked at the image description? (Because I agree that screenshots are generally not acceptable for living people) As far as I know, this one is OK and there are several other images from this trailer on Commons and used in articles. If there's a problem with using it, could you please let me know. There's been some discussion at Commons over what is and is not suitable, and I've been asking another editor there for clarification. If you know something that I'm not aware of, it would be a real help. Thanks Rossrs (talk) 10:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you're right. I can't keep up with image permissions. - Dudesleeper / Talk 10:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neither can I. I was hoping you could enlighten me. Our policies are nothing if not confusing. Cheers. Rossrs (talk) 10:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

club logos[edit]

What's this "one author who has requested deletion or blanked the page" about?

What happened was that a user put these logos in and then changed their mind and requested that they be deleted. His reason was not supplied, but people often do this when they find that they are not allowed to do what they did, perhaps the logos were too high resolution. The logs that were deleted in the spree are File:Manchester City.svg File:Hull City.svg File:Blackpool.svg File:Charlton Athletic.svg File:Stoke City FC.svg File:West Ham United FC.svg File:Tottenham Hotspur.svg File:Sunderland AFC.svg. The user who put them up and asked to delete was Arteyu (talk · contribs). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool[edit]

hi, wasn't able to upload a svg, sorry, but I put up a png version of the badge, hopefully that will do the trick or at least give someone the image to do a svg version, cheers Prem4eva (talk) 11:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Blackpool01xq5.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Blackpool01xq5.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deantown[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Deantown, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This looks like an alternative name for the settlement commonly known as Dean Village. The "was" in the all too short entry, and lack of any corroborating evidence, makes me think it should go.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tagishsimon (talk) 01:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is, per google, a Deantown cannot be found in Edinburgh. One can be found outside Edinburgh - a mining village, according to http://www.scottishmining.co.uk/260.html. There is a Deantown Drive listed in the google searches, but... If we cannot find anything but circumstantial evidence (such as the biog of a footballer) then should it be in the encyclopedia as a fact? --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alec Wallace[edit]

Hi, re this edit. The appearances/goals are for whatever league each club played in, not solely the Football League. So as Blackpool were playing in the Lancashire League in the early 1890s, he should have the ??s, unless your books happen to say how many times he did play, if at all? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 07:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Australian footballer)[edit]

I am curious as to why you saw the need to "clarify" the disambiguation qualifier of Darren Bradshaw (Australian footballer) to Darren Bradshaw (Australian rules footballer)? The only other Darren Bradshaw with an article has no link to Australia, so the fact that he plays a different type of football to the one the Aussie plays is irrelevant, in my opinion. Yes, the main article is titled Australian rules football (to avoid ambiguity, despite the official name of the code being Australian Football), but unless a Darren Bradshaw starts playing in the A-League, (Australian footballer) is completely unambiguous - we call them footballers and he's Australian. Would you suggest we change every (English footballer) or (Scottish footballer) article to (English association footballer) or (Scottish association footballer) to match that form of football's main article name? The-Pope (talk) 16:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jaysus Christ, mate. I just looked in Category:Brisbane Lions players and saw another player with the disambiguation (Australian rules footballer), so I thought I'd bring Bradshaw's into line. Have a word with an admin if you want the article moved back. - Dudesleeper / Talk 00:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conyers Kirby[edit]

apparently joined your lot in about 1907 but never played. Don't suppose you can add or correct anything? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:The burbs 1.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The burbs 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:The burbs 2.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The burbs 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Smith[edit]

Just to warn you I'm about to start changing links to the redirect Joe Smith (footballer) to point directly to Joe Smith (footballer born 1889), prior to making Joe Smith (footballer) into a disambig page now that three of them have articles. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

done that, hope I haven't messed up any of the Blackpool articles... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:19, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remembering[edit]

Grrrr, I'm always forgetting that. One day I will. By the way, the steelwork on the South Stand is already going up. Part of the SW corner steelwork is up and the terracing is due to arrive tomorrow morning. The latest rumour (from a source who also said the steel would arrive on Monday) is that BFC are hoping to have 1,000 seats online by the Newcastle game in September. I don't know if you get Sky Sports over there, but on Sunday 12th July the Northern Rail Cup final (rugby league), at Bloomfield Road, is live on there and presumably most of the steel structure of the stand will be up by then.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 13:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scarlett Johansson GAR notification[edit]

Scarlett Johansson has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ycf program cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ycf program cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ycf program cover.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ycf program cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gina Glocksen[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Gina Glocksen. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Glocksen (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for arbitration: Date delinking amendment motion[edit]

A request to amend the dates delinking arbitration case (filed 19 July 2009) has resulted in a motion (filed 2 August 2009) that proposes to change the restrictions imposed on you as a result of the case. The proposed amendment would affect the restrictions pertaining to 16 editors, all of whom are now being notified of the proposed amendment. Given that the proposed amendment affects your restrictions, and further that the proposed amendment will restrict the filing of further proposed amendments for a period of 30 days, your input is invited at the amendments page. You may view an unofficial table of the proposed changes here. Comments from affected parties are currently being considered by the Arbitration Committee. If you would like the arbitrators who have already voted to reconsider their votes in light of your comments, please indicate that in your comments.

For the Arbitration Committee

Seddσn ^talk|^WikimediaUK 03:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If prior form is anything to go by, I'll probably be six feet under by the time anything is decided. "Hear, hear! Speak up, old boy, we can't hear you up here at the back." - Dudesleeper / Talk 23:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Holloway Era and The Demon[edit]

A in % of 0.00 after two games, looks as though he isn't doing well! don't know if you managed to catch any audio coverage online, but the 2nd half performance today was great to watch and bodes well for the season, if we can add 2 or 3 more players! Anyway, any chance you could have a look at Ishmel Demontagnac? Try as I might I can't get the Blackpool total column in the Career stats table, to line up correctly. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?♦Tangerines♦·Talk 18:00, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yay, cheers for that. It was beginning to bug me!♦Tangerines♦·Talk 18:21, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Percy Downes[edit]

Hi, I've updated the article on Percy Downes, whose article said that he had only played for Blackpool, by adding his other clubs and expanding the article. Big Dom 21:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of Perciville, just says Percy in the book... Big Dom 08:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration motion regarding Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking[edit]

Per a motion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment:

Having considered all the requests for amendment and requests for clarification submitted following the decision in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking, the Arbitration Committee decides as follows:
(1) All remedies in the decision providing that a specified user is topic-banned from editing or discussing "style and editing guidelines" (or similar wording) are modified by replacing these words with the words "style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates";

(2) All remedies in the decision providing that a specified user is "prohibited from reversion of changes which are principally stylistic, except where all style elements are prescribed in the applicable style guideline" are modified by replacing these words with the words "prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates";

(3) All editors whose restrictions are being narrowed are reminded to abide by all applicable policies and guidelines in their editing, so that further controversies such as the one that led to the arbitration case will not arise, and any disagreements concerning style guidelines can be addressed in a civil and efficient fashion;

(4) Any party who believes the Date delinking decision should be further amended may file a new request for amendment. To allow time to evaluate the effect of the amendments already made, editors are asked to wait at least 30 days after this motion is passed before submitting any further amendment requests.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Tiptoety ^talk 04:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this

Jay Emmanuel-Thomas[edit]

The lad has just signed for the Pool from Arsenal on a one-month loan deal. As yet he hasn't played for the Arsenal 1st team, and so doesn't have an article. As he is likly to play some part in tomorrows match, I've created it in my sandbox. As I'll be at the game tomorrow, if you want to create the article should he play, please feel free to copy it into a new article. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 15:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like the rapist is sticking his oar in again on transfers. Doesn't bode well after what happened to Billy Ayre. - Dudesleeper / Talk 22:43, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:18th hole at Pebble Beach, Dudesleeper.jpg[edit]

File:18th hole at Pebble Beach, Dudesleeper.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:18th hole at Pebble Beach, Dudesleeper.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:18th hole at Pebble Beach, Dudesleeper.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 05:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide sources[edit]

Hello, please do not add or return content to articles without providing reliable sources as you did in this edit. Thanks! -- The Red Pen of Doom 11:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cruciate ligament[edit]

Hello, NewTestLeper79. You have new messages at Skittleys's talk page.
Message added 12:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

RE: Wii[edit]

Hi,

No, I don't have FIFA 09, but i've got FIFA 08.

Clyde1998 (talk) 15:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{Lighthouses of Maine}}[edit]

As I said yesterday at Template talk:Lighthouses of Maine, this is one of about thirty templates used to list lighthouses in all the states that have them, as well as several Canadian provinces and other countries. It seems to me that changing one of a matched set of widely used templates deserves discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lighthouses? Please reply here or start the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lighthouses. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 11:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing material from football pages[edit]

Both Blackpool F.C. and Newcastle's pages have ongoing discussions about the copyrightability issue on their talk pages. These discussions provide evidence demonstrating that this material is not subject to any copyright in the UK. If you have evidence to the contrary, please help us sort things out on the talk page. --Thomas B♘talk 04:56, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't hide your major reverts with the minor edit tag, avoidance of open discussion could appear like an admission of guilt to some. More importantly, please don't insult people or their edits in your edit summaries. For my part, I'm sorry I responded the same way, but if you just throw insults around, the discussion polarizes and degenerates until pages are locked. I don't have anything against you, I'd rather take a step back and open up communication, rather than just falling into some edit war. All you have to do is read the article in the talk pages which explains how this material is no longer copyrighted. If you have newer evidence that says the Guardian is incorrect, please post it so I will know that my evidence is no longer good. If you do not have better evidence, why delete the material? --Thomas B♘talk 05:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bloomfield Road[edit]

Hi, just wondering if you would be ok with this sentence being amended - "That year saw the demolition of the North Stand (also known as the Spion Kop)" as at that time it was known only as the Kop or Spion Kop, rather than North Stand. Thanks ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 23:14, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Evatt[edit]

When I chcecked back it had been there, very randomly since October 2008! Removed it now, cheers. --♦Tangerines♦·Talk 14:23, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marietta College[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --ElKevbo (talk) 16:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blackpool F.C. 1969-70.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blackpool F.C. 1969-70.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 21:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1948 FA Cup Final BFC.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1948 FA Cup Final BFC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 21:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for deletion[edit]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 October 29 if you are interested in preserving them. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 00:36, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mossley A.F.C.[edit]

A discussion that concerns you has been started here and your participation in resolving the dispute would be appreciated. Nev1 (talk) 19:49, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allan Brown injury.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Allan Brown injury.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Evatt and Bloomfield Road[edit]

Thanks for letting me know, whoops and I usually check too! Bit of a cock up! I've corrected it now. The capacity at Bloomfield Road has gone back up yet again. At the back of the Kop, another row of seats has been installed, adding around 104-110 seat. So it is now at least 9,750-9,760. In addition, R block in the SW corner which before the South stand was built was a partial block stuck at the end of the West stand is now larger with a number of extra seats already in use. But it is not clear exactly how many yet. With the Preston game on the 30th I presume it will again set a new attendance record. Do you think the capacity should be amended to 9,750 for now or wait until the Preston game, as it will be higher again, possibly (and finally) just over 10,000?--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 21:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kinnoull Hill[edit]

Hi,

Apologies for the lack of response - it's been ages since I've signed in on WP! Re: your question on my talk page (at the bottom): yes, I am certain. Unfortunately, no published documents are available though. I know this from the Stonnington (local council) archives; to verify, go to the Stonnington Archives web database and search for Kinnoull Hill. Kinnoull Hill is supposed to be near Sir Alexander Stewart's home town, according to his diary. I don't know if that can be referenced on WP or not... but it's definitely the Hill and not the town.

All the best,

Hunterd is back! 02:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ayre.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ayre.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 02:07, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism![edit]

Wow, that is pitiful. Not heard of the book nor the "authors". Or should I say "copy and pasters".--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 15:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stéphane Tritz[edit]

The article Stéphane Tritz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 17:51, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asterisks[edit]

The meaning of the asterisk is substitute (out) Substitute in is nr.12 After 1987 you'll find daggers as well, these are also substitutes out (Subsitute in nr. 14)--Cattivi (talk) 00:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Buckley personality section[edit]

If you object to the material in this section, could you help edit it yourself instead of removing it? If you object to the existence of any such section, I've left a note on the talk page about why I've added the section back. And what was wrong with the sources? Ratethatvoiceterms (talk) 04:01, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BFC historians[edit]

I contacted John and he gave me his and Gerry's email addresses (John should answer promptly he always does!!) They both run the Blackpool Programme and Memorabilia Collectors Club - BPMCC (with John the contact, Gerry the author!) and publish regular BFC related books/booklets, if that's also of any interest to you? Books I can remember are "The Khaki Years" (about the WWI seasons), "The £10,000 Goal, the story of the 1930/31 season", "The Italian Job, Pool's Anglo Italian Cup Success", "Monograph of Jock Dodds". Gerry also wrote "The Bloomfield Road Story" and "Seaside Caps" - but I think they are now out of print.

There is also another new book "Blackpool FC on This Day: History, Facts and Figures from Every Day of the Year " by Pool fan Peter Gillatt. Seen it on amazon for £6.99. There was a big article about the book in the Blackpool Gazette on Monday with Ian Holloway and Jimmy Armfield at the book launch. Seems to be promising.

Their email addresses are: johndcross@talktalk.net and gerrywolstenholme@talktalk.net.

Cheers--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 19:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article for deletion nomination of Grand Finale (American Idol 6)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Grand Finale (American Idol 6), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Finale (American Idol 8). Thank you. Aspects (talk) 01:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thornton[edit]

I hadn't even noticed! The postal address is indeed in Fleetwood - Cala Gran Holiday Park, Fleetwood Road, Fleetwood, Lancashire, FY7 8JY. Might as well remove it completely then!--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 19:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Euell[edit]

Aye, he is still the club captain, even though Charlie Adam has been the on-pitch captain mostly in recent games. Although Adam started the game as skipper yesterday, once BBB went off injured, and Euell came on, the captain's armband was immediately handed to Euell. And he still has his "Captain Speaking" skippers column in the matchday programme.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 16:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Minor" edits[edit]

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Talk:Association football, as "minor" if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits. Per Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. The rule of thumb is that only vandalism/test reversions or edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modifying content should be flagged as "minor". Thank you. —David Levy 17:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloomfield facade.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield facade.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloomfield North East view.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield North East view.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloomfield South Stand upper level.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield South Stand upper level.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloomfield East Stand.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield East Stand.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloomfield looking northwest.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield looking northwest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:South Stand players tunnel.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:South Stand players tunnel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloomfield corridor.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield corridor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloomfield players tunnel.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield players tunnel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloomfield refreshments.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield refreshments.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:South Stand from tunnel.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:South Stand from tunnel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloomfield turnstiles.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield turnstiles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Tommy Boyd[edit]

I'm not removing promptional material. You removed it. I'm putting it back on. Tommy Boyd isn't happy with this either. Stop removing it please OurDad (talk) 00:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Crainey[edit]

Please stop adding unnecessary details about his appearance in Nationwide team of the week. This is a fairly trivial achievement and if we were to add these details to every player it would almost double the size of many articles. (some players have appeared over 30 times) Please explain why you think this is so important to Steven Crainey's article before reverting. Reverting with no explanation appears to be vandalism. 82.41.218.178 (talk) 16:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since we're on a please theme, leave comments on the relevant article talk page, not mine. Thanks. - Dudesleeper talk 00:03, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why? You rarely discuss anyway. It's people like you who put new editors off making good faith improvements to articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.218.239 (talk) 17:13, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed a reference to a speculative newspaper article linking Crainey to a move to another club. Again, if every article on footballers was to include every item like this Wikipedia would double in size —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.100.4 (talk) 23:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cesc Fàbregas[edit]

I've fully protected the page. Please discuss the height and sources at Talk:Cesc Fàbregas#Height & page protection. Thanks. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 12:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nottingham Forest[edit]

Why have you deleted the list of celebrity fans from the Nottingham Forest page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.97.17 (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Footy guidelines. - Dudesleeper talk 14:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which particular section of these guidelines? - other Clubs (Derby County, for example)include celebrity fans; on other Club pages there is information which is decidedly less notable than this - the list of the names and prices of the programmes on the Blackpool FC page is one example —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.109.251 (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is why you shouldn't be editing. - Dudesleeper talk 01:55, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An explanation here instead of a childish insult would have been welcome —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.121.84 (talk) 16:51, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Dudesleeper! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 940 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Gordon Goudie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Katheryn Winnick - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Diana Davies - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Cy Chadwick - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tony Pitts - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rebecca Croft - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Goonies edits?[edit]

Hi Dudesleeper,

please can you tell me why you edited my contributions regarding the 20th + 25th anniversary events of the Goonies? They're completely relevant to the cult status topic within the Wiki page and it's information that all Goonies fans will appreciate knowing about. I also do not understand why my external links to Goonies websites were removed either. These are quintessential websites for Goonies fans to visit, other than IMDB. In fact, IMDB draws a lot of it's information from these websites.

Thank you Andy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoriginalgoonie (talk • contribs) 18:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC) --Theoriginalgoonie (talk) 18:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cy Chadwick[edit]

The article Cy Chadwick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find any significant coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Olaf Davis (talk) 21:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leigh Jenkinson[edit]

Hi - I have edited this article created by you some time ago to remove the reference to his being a full Wales international. He is not listed as such in any of my reference books, nor does he appear on the team list for the Brazil match. I have added an explanatory note to the article talk page. Cheers. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 17:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Husband[edit]

Hi, just letting you know that I've created an article for him here - User:Tangerines/sandbox5 (any mistakes in it, by all means change it) ready for when he makes his debut as BFC reckon he will be in the squad for the West Brom game on Wednesday evening. I'll be at the game so will hopefully add the article, if he plays, when I get back. cheers.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 00:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Euell[edit]

I noticed on the Plymouth squad that they have club captain, team captain and vice captain listed. Given that Euell is still the club captain, but Charlie Adam is now clearly the on-field captain, with Euell rarely appearing now, as you previously mentioned, do you think it might be an idea to amend Euell to club captain and have Adam listed as team captain?--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 14:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Armstrong[edit]

Defunct as a pro team yes, but still exists as an amateur and junior side. Have fixed the club page. thanks for pointing out, 8lgm (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Blackpool: A Complete Record 1887–1992[edit]

I have nominated Category:Blackpool: A Complete Record 1887–1992 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. R12056 (talk) 22:59, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Err, are any of the links you provided correct? - Dudesleeper talk 23:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool F.C. media prods[edit]

Hey man, I appreciate your action over the prods I placed on those articles, but do you really think it is wise to have such a large section of the Blackpool F.C. article devoted to two non-notable subjects? There is nothing special about either the book or the DVD (many clubs have books devoted to their results and stats, and DVDs about their best games), so why mention them at all? It's not really encyclopaedic info. – Pee Jay 00:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not, I'm just waiting till have time to pare it down - if it even can be. - Dudesleeper talk 02:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no worries. Good luck :) – Pee Jay 03:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blackpool F.C. 1986-87 squad.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blackpool F.C. 1986-87 squad.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 03:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloomfield Road Dudesleeper.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield Road Dudesleeper.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:39, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bloomers[edit]

To be honest I'm still not sure. We know of course it was 10,035 and that it has gone up by at least 2,500. But for the Nottingham Forest game on the 17th, they have been given A and B blocks in the Kop plus they will get part of C block (the rest of C being for segregation), but not all of the East stand. There was talk that if they got crowds of over 12,000 then they would have to pay the council, because of traffic and roadworks that haven't yet been done. But no-one seems to really know. Maybe John Cross or Gerry Wolstenholme might know? Sorry I couldn't be of more help! I just hope we hit 10,000 on Monday, but if not then the Forest game will see well over 11,000.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 01:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

barnstars[edit]

I noticed you presented Add92 with a football barnstar.I just wondered if you would consider looking at my contributions and think about giving me one? Gobbleswoggler (talk) 12:40, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA 2010 redirect[edit]

See Talk:2010 FIFA World Cup#2010 FIFA World Cup video game. Redirecting "FIFA {year}" to the World Cup article is established standard. See FIFA 2002 and FIFA 2006. Please add your rationale for reverting to the World Cup talk page, otherwise I'll have to undo your edit as unhelpful. --78.34.222.55 (talk) 00:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care either way, but an edit summary of "adjust" helps nobody. - Dudesleeper talk 13:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wolstenholme[edit]

Hi there, does your Blackpool book have information about Arthur Wolstenholme (date of debut, etc.) who played for the club between 1909 and 1912? I just created the article, but couldn't find some of this out, so it would be much appreciated if you could add it to the page. Cheers, Big Dom 10:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"former"[edit]

I saw you commented on the use of this phrase, and while i think i agree with you, i couldnt find a style guide on WP to confirm this. Is this use you advocate simply consensus and used in the vast majority of situations, or is there a style guide? I put a query in at a project page for using "the elements of style" on WP. seems like its worth formulating a style guide if not already done.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template policy discussion[edit]

You are invited to help consider a common template policy for all WP:SPORTS biography articles at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sports#Template_policy_discussion.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

The useful contributions to Mr. Brown's article are much appreciated, as it mostly just seems to draw vandalism like a magnet. Very nice user page too. Good luck to Blackpool in the playoffs, they're off to a cracking start. Cheers, Northumbrian (talk) 00:00, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Austin Green[edit]

You're right, Green is not best known for 2 roles - but 1. Following along the Bio:LP intro guidelines, I've re-written that para with 4 new cites. Seems most notable sources (and quotes from Green himself) see his career still defined by the prominence of 90210. EBY (talk) 16:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caine[edit]

Hi there, would you be able to find the time to add a bit of information about Brian Caine's extremely short Blackpool career? Cheers, Big Dom 21:00, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blackpool F.C. FL finishing positions (overall).jpg[edit]

Hi. I think that the image you've created for Blackpool's league finishes could be misconstrued. Really it should show the Football League including the Premier League, otherwise there's a bit of a disjuncture in 1992. Additionally, it doesn't reflect the much smaller number of clubs that were in the Football League in its earlier days. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 09:43, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perth introduction, possible tidy-up?[edit]

hello Dudesleeper

i have just added a basic summary of Perth's history to the introduction of the article (i just felt the intro. was too short). although, i have done a pretty good job myself, i feel it would be best if you could have a look at tidying-up loose ends.Kilnburn (talk) 09:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:With A Little Help From My Friends.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:With A Little Help From My Friends.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hyde FC[edit]

Hi, you deleted the image of Hyde FCs logo and said you removed it because it is wrong and you dont want to confuse people, but i have found out that that logo was right so please could you add the logo back to the infobox. thanks. --Liamtaylor007 (talk) 18:08, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hi there apologies for not getting back to you before now. I've been on a self-imposed "wiki break" but hope to be start editing again now! I took the wrong damn time to do so given the superb events at Wembley stadium which was definitely one of the most amazing days of my life!--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 01:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Time for some teamwork?[edit]

Hi there DUDE, VASCO from Portugal here,

I noticed your input at WP:FOOTY about User:Rupert1904, also undid some of his stuff (not all the Spanish squad, there are some players such as Iker Casillas or David Villa which must get thousands of edits per week, no point in me contributing there, most likely pretty much everything will be reverted/toyed with, hence i am "afraid" of clicking in a player's page then seeing the mess it's in and having to waste 3 or 4 hours improving it...for NOTHING).

About Rupert: after we undid his stuff, he logged off and did the same as anon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/68.227.13.101 see here, all have been reverted except PIQUÉ and RAMOS), hopefully it's his only anon address, if not we're in for some serious trouble.

Cheers, keep up the great work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 01:20, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks anyway :) - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 01:44, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BFC 2009-10[edit]

Odd one that. I will do some rooting around. I have all the programmes from last season anyway so will check and get back to you.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 12:52, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Morris Sar[edit]

Morris Sar has been at it again, recently removed the F.C. from the Grimsby Town page so I thought I'd inform you as it looks as if you have had plenty of problems with this user before. Regards Footballgy (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Wolstenholme[edit]

Just noticed that there is a player called Tom Wolstenholme in the List of Blackpool F.C. players, and I wondered if it was the same player that played for Burnley between 1907 and 1908, and also played for Bolton Wanderers and Bradford Park Avenue? Just checking before I create the article. If so, please would you be able to provide years and stats, etc. Cheers, Big Dom 21:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've created it now, so any extra information you have would be appreciated. Cheers, Big Dom 09:15, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Mark Halstead[edit]

Hello Dudesleeper. I am just letting you know that I deleted Mark Halstead, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blackpool Calley.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blackpool Calley.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 00:27, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Seasiders DVD.jpg[edit]

FYI, User:Mosmof has nominated this file for deletion. If you disagree with this nomination, you should add comments here. --SkotyWA^T_C 06:43, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Slack[edit]

Hi there, just letting you know that I recently created another article about a former Blackpool player, Bill Slack, but as usual I've no way of adding some of the stats so wondered if you'd be able to? Cheers, Big Dom 13:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that on the List of Blackpool F.C. players he is credited as Wilf Slack, but it's definitely the same person. Big Dom 21:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: FK Jelgava vs Blackpool F.C.[edit]

Hi Dude, I've declined your CSD nomination of FK Jelgava vs Blackpool F.C. because "it was a non-notable match. Indeed, it was a friendly" is not a valid CSD rationale (see WP:CSD for more info). Feel free to AfD or PROD the article if you wish. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 19:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Broadhurst[edit]

"I remember when all this were stubs" ;) The 1920s are a black hole for decent sources on City, I'd even struggle to do anything decent with 1926 FA Cup Final. Broadhurst did play in a notable 8–0 last day win which has some decent coverage (the club missed out on promotion on goal average by 0.05 of a goal), so I've put that in but have little else. A shame really, that goalscoring record is most impressive, and it would be interesting to find out why he fell out of favour so suddenly, whether injury or something else. Oldelpaso (talk) 13:19, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Courier b.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Courier b.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Teddy Duckworth[edit]

All (albeit online) sources I've seen about this chap refer to him as "Teddy" - what do the Blackpool books say? Giant Snowman 01:08, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, maybe he was known as just Thomas during his brief playing career in England, but when he moved to Europe (where he was much more famous & much more successful) he became "Teddy"? - perhaps someone in Switzerland misheard "Tommy" or something? Giant Snowman 17:50, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Brown (footballer born 1900)[edit]

Looking back at the history, I see that my edit was in 2007, so I probably got this from the www.allfootballers.com website which is no longer available, so can only defer to the printed version. Sorry I can't be more helpful. Cheers. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:57, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Cardwell[edit]

I think Joyce includes appearances from the abandoned 1939–40 season, so 39 if you exclude those (as I do), or 42 if you include them. Oldelpaso (talk) 18:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Try here[edit]

Link to his contributions [5] Bevo74 (talk) 11:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's him. I'll do the necessaries later. - Dudesleeper talk 18:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Juniors[edit]

Thanks for the kind words. Your own work is much appreciated. Hope you and your family had a great Christmas. Sgt Elvan (talk) 00:12, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Hi Dudesleeper,

thaught you may be able to help me with this, i need to know if a player for example playing for Hyde F.C. has never played a fully professional game and he then appears in the FA Cup 1st round proper for Hyde FC, does he deserve a page because he has made an appearence in a fully professional competition.

Cheers Liam Taylor 22:00, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that's enough to establish notability, yes, unless something has changed that I don't know about. - Dudesleeper talk 23:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Hi again Dudesleeper,

Sorry to bother you again but there is another thing i need to ask you......

I have the Category Category:Hyde United F.C. players , but the club has changed its name at the start of the season to Hyde F.C. so i want to know how can i make a new category called Hyde F.C. players and make the Hyde United players category non existant.

Cheers

Liam Taylor 18:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The out on loan bit of Blackpool FC[edit]

Hi Dudesleeper, i'm sure danny Coids loan to Rotherham has expired 12 days ago, heres proof http://www.themillers.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10360~2267801,00.html which is why I deleted that line out of the section. Seasider91 (talk) 15:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ron_Davies_(footballer_born_1942)[edit]

Hi, I've seen your NPOV tag from May 2010 on the above article. You were 100% right in my opinion, and no-one else had challeneged. So I have done a massive cutting job on it. If you have the time then please could you review it and see if the NPOV tag can now be removed. I'm about to add a citations tag! Thanks - Sitush (talk) 14:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Howie Carr Show[edit]

I had created a section to discuss 'Notable guests' on the Talk Page - wish you could have used that rather than engage in a potential 3R. Jrclark (talk) 12:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Burnley[edit]

I've reverted your change to Burnley as it was obvious vandalism, which seems odd for a user of your experience. Are we in a bad mood today? --Trappedinburnley (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting that back again. FYI I’ve not decided that all geographic articles should list any football clubs in the area in the lead section. However, it does seem to be customary to mention the most notable things about the place. As far as I am aware the only reason the average person alive today would even know of Burnley’s existence is Burnley FC. It was in a nice sentence about what the town was probably most famous for, but someone decided to ‘improve’ it. --Trappedinburnley (talk) 17:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Stanley Matthews[edit]

Wasn't really any need to refer to Man Utd as "Manure" in that last edit summary, was there? Also, Matthews made several guest appearances for United during WW2, so it seemed apt for the Man Utd task force to support the article. Can never have too many groups supporting an article, I reckon. – Pee Jay 01:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dawn Acton[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dawn Acton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GSorby - Talk! 22:27, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Walter Atherton[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Walter Atherton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. ARDawson (talk) 11:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that I have declined this speedy. Cheers, Big Dom 11:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Adams Liverpool squad number[edit]

I have removed this as there is a blank entry on the official squad list page here http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/team/first-team and I rekon the training kit used was borrowed as part of the clubs publicity stunt as he couldn't well do it in his Blackpool gear or whatever he was wearing that day could he?Seasider91 (talk) 07:17, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Or... they've had an age to get things in order and 15 will be his squad number? - Dudesleeper talk 10:09, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could be the case that the site is behind the club in terms of squad progressions though its highly unlikely considerring adams names on the list and Darbys listed as being on loan, best leaving it alone till the site confirms it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seasider91 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

Since you're the king of rules, you should sue them for the copyright breach. - user:hsxeric

Barry Ferguson[edit]

Hello. I'm surprised you reverted to a version of the article with Ferguson a Blackpool player and no club reference to verify it. Perhaps he has already signed, but as of 8.30am Friday UK time, Blackpool haven't announced it either on their website or on their Twitter feed. If he stays fit, he'll be an excellent signing. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 07:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Camelon badge.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Camelon badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:08, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Football In Scotland task force[edit]

As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Football a new Football In Scotland task force has been set up as you edit Scottish football articles i would like to invite you to become a member if you wish. Warburton1368 (talk) 15:39, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mayfield Place.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mayfield Place.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Molly Ringwald[edit]

please check the photographs author info' to see that the photograph's title is to be deleted

82.36.156.186 (talk) 11:54, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Fyhr[edit]

Oh, God knows why, I'm sure it all made sense at the time. Giant Snowman 17:46, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is requested[edit]

Please make your point at Should the club's league be included in player articles. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:23, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The conclusion at the project page has been to include the league. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:38, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Calm down, dear." - Dudesleeper talk 12:21, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blackpool F.C. 1908-09 squad.jpg needs authorship information.[edit]

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Blackpool F.C. 1908-09 squad.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|NewTestLeper79/Archive 20}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:44, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blackpool F.C. 1906-07 squad.jpg needs authorship information.[edit]

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Blackpool F.C. 1906-07 squad.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|NewTestLeper79/Archive 20}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blackpool F.C. 1904-05 squad.jpg needs authorship information.[edit]

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Blackpool F.C. 1904-05 squad.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|NewTestLeper79/Archive 20}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All Creatures[edit]

I created the page but there is no original content from me. I merely separated the TV series and film information which was previously on the same page so I don't know where the figure of 91 episodes came from - Sealman talk 21:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello NewTestLeper79/Archive 20! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Images - Perthmixed.jpg and PerthScotland.jpg[edit]

I see that File:Perthmixed.jpg has been tagged for deletion and it looks as if it was your work originally though not uploaded by you. I copied the image to Commons, which got it spotted. Can it be saved?

You did not get the notification as the image was uploaded by User:LemonCrumpet (who may or may not be related to you; none of my business frankly). It is a good image, if it is not a Copyvio, which I have used elsewhere and would be sore to lose, if it is not a Copyvio.

The same would apply to File:PerthScotland.jpg. I would transfer that to Commons too if its copyright tag were fixed; until it is, then a transfer would get it jumped on and wiped.

Hogweard (talk) 13:28, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to leave you to square it with Commons by showing where the images come from.

A derivative which I made and uploaded to Commons is, I now see, just a re-creation of File:St. Matthew's Church and Smeaton's Bridge.jpg which you mentioned. It is a good picture (and that has always been my favourite view of Perth). I see it alone is used alone to illustrate Perth elsewhere. Hogweard (talk) 13:44, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blackpool F.C. crest (1938).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blackpool F.C. crest (1938).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

William Williams[edit]

A player of the name William Williams played for Blackpool and Everton in the 1920s. Joyce has his date of birth rather cryptically as 16/11/?? Do your books give any more info? For the moment, I have disambiguated him to William David Williams. Thanks for any help. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:38, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thanks for that response. Do any of your reference books give a full date and place of birth/death? As for Saturday, I hope we can maintain our 100% home record. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 23:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Smith (footballer)[edit]

Hi, do you have a source for your additions to this article. Giant Snowman 18:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Puncheon[edit]

I have reverted your own revert as Puncheon's loan at QPR has now ended. Technically he is now a Southampton player but whether he ever pulls on the red and white stripes again remains to be seen. In yesterday's local paper he was quoted as saying "I'd like to start afresh at Saints", so maybe he can get over his problem with Nigel Adkins; after our recent performances, we could do with an injection of new blood as there is no real depth in the squad. Cheers. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Serenity Now[edit]

The article Serenity Now has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable album per WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 21:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clubname[edit]

Hi, I noticed your recent edits where you added "F.C." to the "clubname" parameters at football club articles, and was wondering if there is any consenus to encourage this? I seem to recall (probably incorrectly) that a consensus was reached that articles should stick with the status quo and remain unchanged, but I likely just dreamt that up. Anyway, I just thought I'd bring this up as I'm not quite sure about it myself. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 00:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Niall Mackenzie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Denny (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Care to explain?[edit]

What was the reason for [this] edit? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the edit did go through? I clicked on the wrong rollback link on my watchlist page and thought I'd backed out of it in time, because it said 'rollback failed'. Apparently not, however. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dudesleeper (talk • contribs)

Yes, it went through. I suspected it was inadvertent and I've since reverted your removal of my comments, but please include an edit summary =) --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I've done worse by accident so I fully appreciate the situation. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:09, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of notable Blackpool F.C. players[edit]

The article List of notable Blackpool F.C. players has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Arbitrary list, WP:OR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Orphaned non-free image File:Serenity Now.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Serenity Now.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of notable Blackpool F.C. players for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of notable Blackpool F.C. players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable Blackpool F.C. players until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jock Dodds image[edit]

Hello mate. This image of Dodds was uploaded by you on 3 April 2007. As part of the "Fair-use rationale" you have mentioned that the image is only available for the articles "Jock Dodds" and "History of Blackpool F.C. (1887–1962)", I was wondering on what copyright grounds the image was only available for these two articles specifically and not for other articles. It was my intention to use the image on "List of Sheffield United F.C. players" which I'm recently improving however this copyright query has stopped me from doing so. Can you please confirm for me if I am able to use it on this article please? Also I was wondering when the image was taken, because if was 70 years ago (baring in mind you uploaded it 5 years ago), it might now be copyright free if I'm correct. Also the licensing may need updating too. I'm not too good with copyright law and international copyright law haha. Regards IJA (talk) 15:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add it to the article then. I'm guessing I can remove the "Hist of B'pool" and Dodds only statement on the file itself then too? If someone with a better knowledge of Copyright Law objects, I'll remove it. Regards IJA (talk) 16:07, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Davy[edit]

Hi,

I stumbled across this article which you created not so long ago, and the information in the infobox and the text don't seem to match. Since I don't have a copy of Joyce to check his career information myself, just thought I'd let you know that there was an issue so it could be fixed when you get the chance. J Mo 101 (talk) 01:19, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Rangers F.C. international footballers for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Rangers F.C. international footballers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Everton F.C. international players until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Edinburgh Wanderer 20:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting[edit]

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events (Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities (WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions (GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Debbie dobson.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Debbie dobson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You removed my photo.[edit]

You imposed your opinion that a WikiCommons photo of the James Herriot Museum was not relevant to the All Creatures Great And Small page by removing the photo. Please do something creative by also posting what you consider to be a relevant photo to the header section. The one I posted was the only one I could find in Commons. All Creatures Great and Small was one of my all time favorite shows and I hate the fact that there is no header photo on that Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpittard (talk • contribs) 02:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blackpool F.C. crest (1999).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blackpool F.C. crest (1999).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 13:56, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lip Service.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lip Service.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Elliot Grandin[edit]

Heah I noticed you recently changed Grandins number back to 8 on the Blackpool F.C. page, it is in fact now 10 as reported on the official site such as at the bottom of this article http://www.blackpoolfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10432~2852142,00.html Seasider91 (talk) 22:07, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanfield players[edit]

Hi Dudesleeper, thanks for the recent comment on my talk page. At least I know one other person is interested on the Juniors on wiki! Was just wanting to mention the Jeanfield Swifts players you added to the Junior internationals section on the Scottish Junior Football Association page. Aird and Kelly don't actually belong there as neither player won a Junior international cap before their illustrious Senior career. Maybe a page or category for all ex-Junior players who received Senior international caps would be a possibility but I haven't thought too much about it.

Incidentally, Jeanfield have had two players capped for the Scotland Juniors side, Harry Adamson in 1947 and Ally Hill in 1952. Adamson made over 200 appearances for Notts County and is surely worthy of a page in his own right, while Hill's page makes little reference to his Junior career. Over time I hope to get around as many ex-Juniors as possible and add categories/detail to their articles. Thanks again Sgt Elvan (talk) 11:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

huh[edit]

im bit confussed why did you undo it????Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 16:24, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rangers page hasnt went to the dogs[edit]

the page is getting brought up to FA status as per other articles like arsenal fc and manchester utd fc. the page is also getting fixed to MOS to comply if you want reinstate stuff please discuss it on the talk page first as your basically vandalising the page--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 16:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Blackpool F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivorian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duttons[edit]

You will find masses of info about duttons at the site "Cottontown" The Oh Be Joyful brand was joyful for duttons as it made them a mint, the company MD had the no plate OBJ 1 on his roller!Markdarrly (talk) 00:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC) houston we have a problem!Markdarrly (talk) 00:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Blackpool F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard[edit]

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!
	Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!

Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields.
Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either.
00:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Blackpool F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Valley (stadium) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Good Will Hunting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Citizens Bank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Blackpool F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Molineux (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Thompson (footballer born 1960), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy Mullen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:24, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billy Connolly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parkinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:North Stand from south-west corner.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:North Stand from south-west corner.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:55, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bloomfield panorama.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield panorama.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bloomfield 1970s.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield 1970s.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

McManaman[edit]

Umm... is there a better reason for this edit than "seems like the Yanks are getting-carried-away-a-ha"? Because the material is reliably sourced and notable. Please don't delete it again without engaging in a conversation on the article's talk page.David in DC (talk) 00:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Billy Ayre tribute, April 2012.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Billy Ayre tribute, April 2012.jpg, which you've attributed to TV screenshot. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Billy Ayre tribute, April 2012.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Billy Ayre tribute, April 2012.jpg, which you've attributed to screen shot of copyright television show. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

Disambiguation link notification for April 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan Withers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:21, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ally McCoist[edit]

Why are you using rollback to revert sourced edits which are not vandalism? Was this a mistake? Please take more care in future. Thanks, 176.253.49.188 (talk) 11:27, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Radio2000.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Radio2000.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Radio 2000 (South Africa) Logo[edit]

Hey Dudesleeper.
The Radio 2000 Logo technically has an opaque background, so I editted the high res pic you uploaded with this change (Note I changed it to a .gif to apply the transparency). Radio 2000 Logo
Let me know if this cool?
Radio 2000 Wiki
-- Tom Malinowski 10:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ribchester, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Excavated (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Simon Wiles may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''Simon Peter Wiles''' (born 22 April 1985) is an English former [Association football|footballer]] who is now a coach.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Blackpool F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penrith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting[edit]

You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Um...[edit]

[6] - Why did you remove a disambiguation needed tag that was 100% valid? Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:20, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To see if you'd notice. - Dudesleeper talk 14:21, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And an actual answer? Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:25, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your "Disambiguated Billy Gibson" summary implies you did something helpful. Unless this is helpful: [[Billy Gibson[disambiguation needed]|Billy Gibson]]- Dudesleeper talk 14:27, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Journalistic Opinion reverts[edit]

Che1563 (talk) 19:38, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Journalistic Opinion reverts[reply]

I noticed that you did a lot of reverts on me on the issue that they were journalistic opinion. You also mentioned me on a wiki about editing without at least first contacting me and discussing any concerns that you have.

I do not go on wikipedia and disparage players or their reputations, I was simply adding details (95% of them referenced) about a players abilities or attributes. I guess according to your opinion, I cannot post saying Roberto Carlos is skillful at free kicks, or that Pele was a great goal scorer or that Xavi is great passer even if it was referenced because it was a journalist's opinion. So a wikipedia page can only say a player's biographical stats and chronological history and cannot discuss how a player's playing style is? If you go to the articles for the above players there are descriptions of their playing styles and I thank all the Wikepedia contributors who posted such information.

Orphaned non-free media (File:She's All on My Mind by WetWetWet single cover art.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:She's All on My Mind by WetWetWet single cover art.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free media (File:Morning Wets.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Morning Wets.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free media (File:Surrendered Bluetones.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Surrendered Bluetones.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free media (File:AIW www.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AIW www.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free media (File:Radio2000.jpg)[edit]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to All Creatures Great and Small (TV series) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Calum proposes to Deirdre on the bus in the episode "Two of a Kind"); Old Chapel, [[Thoralby]]<ref>]http://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WME9WT_Old_Chapel_Thoralby_N_Yorkshire_UK_All_Creatures_Great_
Thoralby, N Yorkshire, UK – All Creatures Great & Small, If Music be the Food of Love (1990)"] - Waymarking.com</ref> (in the episode "If Music Be the Food of Love"); [[Semerwater]] (in the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All Creatures Great and Small (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wensley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of All Creatures Great and Small episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Calcium deficiency and Puma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to All Creatures Great and Small (TV series) characters may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*Second Nurse — [Katy Feeney]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:43, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to All Creatures Great and Small (TV series) characters may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*Briggs, Barbara — [[Maggie Norris (actor)|Maggie Norris]
*Hall, Sam — [[Steve Collins (actor)|Steve Collins]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to All Creatures Great and Small (TV series) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Specials have been released on DVD in Region 1, Region 2 and Region 4. The 1990 Christmas Special (entitled "Brotherly Love" is regarded as being part of Series 7.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

All Creatures Great and Small (TV series) characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to John Gill, James Ellis, John Atkinson, Martin Potter, Peter Benson and Sam Davies

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2013-14 BLACKPOOL F.C. SEASON[edit]

why you remove career statistic ??

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18[edit]

NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk)

NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5

Dear Fellow Wikimedian,

You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9[edit]

Christine Kavanagh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bretton Hall

Judy Wilson (actress) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Housekeeper

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to All Creatures Great and Small (TV series) characters may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*Biggins, Mrs — [[Kathleen Helme]] ("Every Dog His Day" and [[Margaret Jackman]] ("Cheques and Balances" and "If Music Be the Food of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March[edit]

Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited!
	New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page. Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk)

Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited!

New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page.
Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk)

Raikes Hall[edit]

It is what the book states, but other sources suggest the author may have been mistaken on this occasion (or not considered the fact that they may have returned to Raikes Hall when they were researching it). Number 5 7 21:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool lead[edit]

I suppose two things: the amount of detail about matches in 1953 seems undue and the amount of detail about recent seasons also strikes me as recentist. Haldraper (talk) 09:21, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Blackpool F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Perkins and Jack Robinson (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited![edit]

NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter. We hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk)

NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square

Dear Fellow Wikimedian,

New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter.

We hope to see you there!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Inch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon invite[edit]

You're invited to the Peabody Essex Museum Edit-a-thon Spring 2014

On May 3rd, the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts will be hosting a Native American and Chinese Art edit-a-thon from 9:00-5:00 pm. You are more than welcome to attend, as there will be free food and drink, and an outing afterwards. If you are interested, please sign up here, as we would love to see you there!

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Ed Rodley's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bloomfield Road may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The [[Hotel rating|four-star]] hotel, which houses a second-floor restaurant named Rowley's,<ref>[http://www.rowleysatbfc.com/ [http://www.rowleysatbfc.com/ ""Rowley's at BFC"] - About Rowleys, www.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits[edit]

Hi. I noticed this series of edits which were all marked as minor edits. Could you please not mark edits as minor unless they are actually minor? Help:Minor edits may be of interest here. --John (talk) 22:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the same token, how is this not a minor edit? - Dudesleeper talk 22:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You could so argue, I suppose. But it is better to err in the direction I have; some editors turn off minor edits in their watchlist and might view what you have done (fairly major restructuring as a series of minor edits) as some sort of subterfuge. I am not making that judgement, just asking you nicely to adhere to community standards on this. --John (talk) 23:15, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 21:20, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial edit-a-thons[edit]

Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England
As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows: May 21st at Northeastern University's Snell Library, in the Digital Scholarship Commons on the second floor May 22nd at Brown University's Rockefeller Library, in the Digital Scholarship Lab June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time. If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England

As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows:

May 21st at Northeastern University's Snell Library, in the Digital Scholarship Commons on the second floor
May 22nd at Brown University's Rockefeller Library, in the Digital Scholarship Lab
June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand

We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time.

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

New England Wikimedians summer events![edit]

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested: Cape Cod Wiknic and Photography Blitz on June 14th in Barnstable County, with complete travel reimbursements available for those who participate Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial Edit-a-thon on June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand 3rd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, which will feature at least one guest speaker, and possibly many more Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: Wikimania 2014 in London If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!

After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:

Cape Cod Wiknic and Photography Blitz on June 14th in Barnstable County, with complete travel reimbursements available for those who participate
Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial Edit-a-thon on June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand
3rd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, which will feature at least one guest speaker, and possibly many more

Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August:

Wikimania 2014 in London

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

New England Wikimedians summer events![edit]

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested: Cape Cod Wiknic and Photography Blitz on June 14th in Barnstable County, with complete travel reimbursements available for those who participate Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial Edit-a-thon on June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand 3rd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, which will feature at least one guest speaker, and possibly many more Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: Wikimania 2014 in London If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!

Cape Cod Wiknic and Photography Blitz on June 14th in Barnstable County, with complete travel reimbursements available for those who participate
Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial Edit-a-thon on June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand
3rd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, which will feature at least one guest speaker, and possibly many more

Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August:

Wikimania 2014 in London

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

wet wet wet[edit]

You have appeared to removed the musical credits I implemented on the various album pages [wet wet wet]. I was just wondering what spurred you to do this, as the credits [including the technical usage of the Emulator synth] are correct. If you could allow me to understand you views I would be most pleased, thank you. Simply tom (talk) 19:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keeley Forsyth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heartbeat (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Blackpool F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penrith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

Last chance if you revert again I will report you for edit warring. Lukejordan02 (talk) 17:08, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Go crazy. Have you actually looked at what you're removing each time? Thanks for the threat, though. - NewTestLeper79 talk 17:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's got nothing to do with the content, edit warring is rule breaking full stop and if you actually read the rules you will see it says reverting anything that isn't vandalism should be explained in the edit summary. Do you know what one of them is? Lukejordan02 (talk) 17:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reverting incorrect content; what are you reverting? - NewTestLeper79 talk 18:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained changes. Lukejordan02 (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've had four blocks this year. I've had none in 8.5 years. So don't be offended if I don't heed your opinion too much. - NewTestLeper79 talk 19:39, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I made mistakes in the past but your making mistakes now. And there's a first time for everything. Lukejordan02 (talk) 19:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014–15 Blackpool[edit]

Sorry for any confusion regarding away goals, I am a Manchester United fan first and there articles don't list away goals, I thought it was because of ruling but it isn't it's because they have a different template to other teams. But the fact that the previous Blackpool seasons means there is some unfinished work on these articles. Lukejordan02 (talk) 23:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Blackpool Season question[edit]

Hi, do you know who scored the goal for Burnley during there match against Blackpool as the score was 1-0 but it doesn't mention the scorer on the article. Lukejordan02 (talk) 14:34, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chas Smash may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

to [[Boz Boorer]], who went on to work with the former Smiths frontman from 1991 onwards.<ref>[http://true-to-you.net/questions_with_answers_from_morrissey "Questions and answers with Morrissey"<

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:56, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Blackpool F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reading. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yarmouth, Maine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belfry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22[edit]

Billy Connolly

added a link pointing to Foreman

Partick

added a link pointing to St. Peter's Primary School

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billy Ayre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Godfather. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of More than Love[edit]

The article More than Love has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Jacob Murphy[edit]

Regarding Jacob Murphy, the citation you removed is reliable.. if you look at the BBC report it shows he came on as a sub for N'Guessan when he played for Swindon Town - BBC match report. JMHamo (talk) 23:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But it said Josh... which bit am I missing? - NewTestLeper79 talk 23:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It should have said Jacob not Josh (which is wrong too), I've changed the sentence to use his surname Murphy. Using first name is not encyclopaedic. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 23:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Only Fools and Horses - FAR[edit]

As the third-highest contributor by number of edits to Only Fools and Horses you may want to know about Wikipedia:Featured article review/Only Fools and Horses/archive1 where the FA status of the article is under discussion. Yours, Bencherlite ^Talk 09:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The String Quartet Tribute to Elliott Smith for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The String Quartet Tribute to Elliott Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The String Quartet Tribute to Elliott Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 09:46, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blackpool F.C. squad[edit]

I still don't know why you reverted the addition of Jacobs from the Blackpool template, he has joined the club on loan. I will add his squad number to the template and article tomorrow to avoid an edit war. JMHamo (talk) 20:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you do that, add him to the squad on the Blackpool F.C. article and current-season article. I'm getting tired of, as I said, different editors who specialise in adding updates to only one article, leaving others out-of-date in the process. I'd rather revert an edit to bring it in line with the other articles, since people can't bring themselves to do more than the bare minimum, thus leaving the rest for someone else to do. - NewTestLeper79 talk 21:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's just the way it goes here... not everyone remembers to update everything all the time, so with collaboration it gets done eventually. Also read WP:OWN, nobody owns an article, so if somebody updates the template and not the parent article, that is fine. JMHamo (talk) 01:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not really the best reasoning, is it? - NewTestLeper79 talk 14:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jayne Middlemiss[edit]

Jayne Middlemiss' date of birth is 3 February 1971. The entry on IMDB is incorrect. https://twitter.com/jaynemiddlemiss/status/562565595414396928 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.50.213 (talk) 22:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blue For You.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blue For You.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Make It Tonight.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Make It Tonight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Put The Light On.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Put The Light On.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stay With Me Heartache.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stay With Me Heartache.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harry Hancock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manchester F.C.. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:49, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:String Quartet Elliott Smith.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:String Quartet Elliott Smith.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tony McMahon[edit]

Not particularly sure why you keep revising my edit of removing Tony McMahon from the First Team Squad on the Blackpool F.C. page, and into the 'on loan' section? He's confirmed on loan, and made his debut for Bradford on Saturday - have revised the 2014-15 season article as well.

Karl Oyston[edit]

In the article Karl Oyston, you reverted this edit: [7] which quite reasonably commented "Unnecessary to include father's crime in opening sentence of the lead." You reverted, ostensibly because you considered this to be censorship. I would agree that not mentioning Owen Oyston's convicted crimes on Owen Oyston's page would be censorship, and arguably, not mentioning it somewhere on Karl's page may be leaning towards censorship. However, I can't see that it should be mentioned in the first line. Could you explain why you think it is necessary in the first line? Thanks! --Tom dl (talk) 14:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloomfield 1970s.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloomfield 1970s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:North Stand from south-west corner.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:North Stand from south-west corner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:South stand from West stand.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:South stand from West stand.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Clark games[edit]

Lee Clark managed 33 games 32 championship games and 1 FA CUP game v Aston Villa

Lee Clark Birmingham record 116 games 34 wins (Yeovil in cup is down as draw but won on pens ) 34 draws 48 losses

2015/16 Blackpool FC season[edit]

Hello, I thought I'd let you know my reasoning for undoing your reverted edit, because that is the former players new subsequent club after being released. I have added notes to the bottom of the table to say that the respective players have joined their new club following their Blackpool release. Please do not revert again. Thanks Skyblueshaun (talk) 12:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So we're to update it in two years when they join another club? They didn't move between these two clubs, so please stop putting false information in. - NewTestLeper79 talk 15:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we are. Also in theory these player's contracts don't officially run out until 30 June 2015 so they are signing pre-contract agreements with other clubs. Skyblueshaun (talk) 15:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Also you may want to read the following note for rules on released players and their new clubs. Where a player has been released, the club they subsequently joined is listed, provided it is professional and occurred during the 2015-16 season. The material I am inputting is not false. PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE AGAIN!!!! Skyblueshaun (talk) 16:08, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The 2015-16 season hasn't started. - NewTestLeper79 talk 16:36, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stanah Community Primary School[edit]

Hi NewTestLeper79, Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and consensus at AFDs If schools don't have any notability they're simply WP:BOLDLY redirected although in this case I somehow missed the external cites (which I've now converted correctly) hence it being redirected ... So thank you for reverting/spotting my error :)
Anyway if you see any schools being redirected that's probably why,
Thanks & Happy Editing, –Davey2010^Talk 15:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015-16 Blackpool F.C. Season[edit]

Care to explain why you've removed the destination of the released players in the 'Players Out' section? (e.g. Tom Barkhuizen to Morecambe etc.) The 'Players In' states where players arrived from, so the 'Players Out' should be similar - all destinations were properly sourced, and stated from July 1st. Please stop repeatedly undoing and editing other users work, such as the First Team Squad section on the Blackpool F.C. page, it's unneccesery nitpicking, and unfair given time spent editing pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.121.202 (talk) 14:41, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See section above. NewTestLeper79 talk 15:48, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but these players have already signed for other clubs; nearly every similar article for other club's '2015-16' season includes such transfers. Plus, the 'Players In' section, includes players signing on July 1st, and their previous clubs, making the article out of sync. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.121.202 (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The transactions aren't between Blackpool and the other clubs. The players become free agents, then they are signed by another club. They aren't listed in the club squads until July 1 because that would make it inaccurate. The transfer paperwork has been filed, so the transaction itself can be documented in the ins and outs. - NewTestLeper79 talk 17:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And if you can't figure out how to make a Wikipedia account, I don't think I should be paying much attention to your claims as to how things should be on here. - NewTestLeper79 talk 17:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Your recent editing history at Nile Ranger shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Giant Snowman 15:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Autophilia (or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love My Car)[edit]

The article Autophilia (or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love My Car) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Orphaned non-free image File:Autophilia2.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Autophilia2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:32, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Autophilia.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Autophilia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Proposed deletion of Keep the Home Fires Burning (The Bluetones song)[edit]

The article Keep the Home Fires Burning (The Bluetones song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA[edit]

You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to File:Howie Carr Show logo.jpeg, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billy Connolly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaelic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dunoon Observer.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dunoon Observer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paige Peterson (actress) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paige Peterson (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paige Peterson (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Howie Carr Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Jackson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yarmouth, Maine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incorporated. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of After Hours (The Bluetones song)[edit]

The article After Hours (The Bluetones song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Proposed deletion of Head on a Spike[edit]

The article Head on a Spike has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Orphaned non-free image File:After Hours Bluetones.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:After Hours Bluetones.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Head on a Spike.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Head on a Spike.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Juniors[edit]

Hi there, thanks for getting stuck into the East Region! Their AGM is tomorrow evening so the North and South Divisions will be announced then.

Harthill and Luncarty both sat out last season along with Crossgates who withdrew midway. Luncarty and Crossgates are returning while Harthill are not.

A couple of other things of note. Montrose Roselea have applied to switch to the North Region. When that is rubber stamped, Armadale Thistle will be reprieved from relegation from the East Premier. Craigroyston have also joined the East Region from the East of Scotland League and will go into the South Division.

I'll have a look at the list of clubs when I'm back from work and see who shouldn't be there. Probably a couple of North sides. Congratulations on Jeanfield's promotion by the way! 05:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Okay... so I have looked at the List of Scottish Junior Football Association clubs and make it 160 clubs competing in 2016–17! Breakdown as below:

West Region (64 clubs)
East Region (61 clubs)
North Region (35 clubs)

Sgt Elvan (talk) 17:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! Sorry, Ive not been online for a while. It's hard to second guess what what the Regions will do as they are all independently minded. The East AGM was this week but they haven't announced the league line ups - I am almost certain though, that Oakley United will go into the East Region South Division and make it a 15/14 split. Similarly, up North, it is most likely they will transfer clubs between the First Divisions to balance numbers. I would make the new set up:

Level	Divisions
1	West Superleague Premier Division 12 clubs		East Superleague 16 clubs		North Premier League 14 clubs
2	West Superleague First Division 14 clubs		East Premier League 16 clubs		North Division One (West) 10 clubs	North Division One (East) 11 clubs
3	Central District Division One 14 clubs	Ayrshire Division One 12 clubs	East Region South Division 14 clubs	East Region North Division 15 clubs
4	Central District Division Two 12 clubs

Sgt Elvan (talk) 19:58, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And one final sting in the tail... Aberdeen University kicked out at the North AGM for non-appearance/non-payment of subscriptions. 159 clubs in total with 10/10 sides in the North First Divisions (East) & (West)

Sgt Elvan (talk) 11:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Later with Jools Holland title card.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Later with Jools Holland title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool F.C.[edit]

Hi there, I'm pretty sure that the club website is up to date with regards to the squad numbers. The recent kit launch photos shows Jay Spearing as number 8, which matches up with what it states in the first team profiles. Seasider91 (talk) 11:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Offside (football) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Offside (football). Since you had some involvement with the Offside (football) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Ketil Trout (^<><!) 07:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on King's Chapel Burying Ground[edit]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page https://www.hmdb.org/marker.asp?marker=18979 and elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA[edit]

Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic
You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck. Sunday July 16 New England Wiknic (also on Facebook) 1–5pm - come by any time! Look for us by the Wikipedia / Wikimedia banner! We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.

Sunday July 16 New England Wiknic (also on Facebook)

1–5pm - come by any time!

Look for us by the Wikipedia / Wikimedia banner!

We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Nomination of Dirigo Public House for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dirigo Public House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirigo Public House until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TM 15:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dirigo Public House logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dirigo Public House logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting my revert! (Seriously!)[edit]

Yikes. I must have gotten confused (I was in the midst of a whole string of article edits concerning a single topic, and was starting to get tired), because I thought you had *added* the offending phrase and that I was undoing it, when exactly the reverse was true! Thanks again! --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 13:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Muswell Hill[edit]

Hi. Sorry, but (a) you didn't address what I said, but just put it back, which I do not think is good practice; (b) Livingston Studios is not in Muswell Hill. Really - it's just not there. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 21:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yarmouth, Maine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Watty Allan[edit]

Hi NewTestLeper79, I'm just looking at the Watty Allan article, which you created back in 2009. with the hope of filling in some of the gaps. Before I continue my investigations, could I just double-check that your reference, "Joyce, Michael (2004). Football League Players' Records 1888–1939. ISBN 1-899468-67-6.", has those clubs listed in the infobox but without any dates? The Watford FC archive has dates, but I'd like to do some more digging before I add those in. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 14:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've sent Watford FC archive an e-mail asking where they got their dates from. Nzd (talk) 15:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I have made some changes, adding a number of other clubs and removing Thames Ironworks, based on conversations with Watford and West Ham historians. I've noted this on the talk page. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, NewTestLeper79. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A Bluetones Companion.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Bluetones Companion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Mudslide (The Bluetones).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mudslide (The Bluetones).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Are You Blue.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Are You Blue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Bluetones BBC Radio Sessions.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bluetones BBC Radio Sessions.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Once Upon a Time in West Twelve.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Once Upon a Time in West Twelve.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:EGY, The Bluetones.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EGY, The Bluetones.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Proposed deletion of File:Peterhead (Scotland) location map.png[edit]

The file File:Peterhead (Scotland) location map.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:33, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

House (TV series) Featured Article Review[edit]

FAR coordinator User:Casliber has nominated House (TV series) for a featured article review here. This is a procedural review of its FA status due to the discovery of socking at its original FAC. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. The instructions for the review process are here.

If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:08, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Ramsay[edit]

It is a pity that your arguments are so feeble that you have to go to personal attacks straight away. I have opened a discussion on the talk page there about the trivial, irrelevant info that you have added. The Banner talk 17:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I predicted you would. This ain't my first rodeo. - NewTestLeper79 talk 17:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gordon Ramsay. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tiderolls 18:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Joe Smith (football manager).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Joe Smith (football manager).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Proposed deletion of Keeley Forsyth[edit]

The article Keeley Forsyth has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. –Davey2010^Talk 01:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:With A Little Help From My Friends.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:With A Little Help From My Friends.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Orphaned non-free image File:Haws logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Haws logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Talk:Walter Atherton[edit]

Look at Talk:Walter Atherton and tell me if deletion is warranted now.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 22:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, NewTestLeper79. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Weaklingchris for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Weaklingchris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weaklingchris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 9H48F (talk) 02:25, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ally McCoist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Mirren (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Connolly[edit]

Hi. I've reverted what you added to the Billy Connolly article. You will, of course, understand that Wikipedia cannot be used as a source for itself. And referencing the The South Bank Show does almost nothing to verify what is said on the Billy Connolly article. All it verifies that Connolly was a guest on the show, it says nothing about what he said on it. It certainly doesn't provide exact quotes. If you can find a source that does, that would be much appreciated. Thanks --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:50, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing Changes[edit]

Instead of wasting users time who have gone out of their way to edit an article, why doesn't Wikipedia create a temaplate so that pages of similar content can follow? If you look at other football club Wiki pages I bet you will struggle to find two that are similar in layout. The changes I made and which you undid are still on other clubs Wiki pages, I take it you will be changing those aswell? Smithy53 (talk) 11:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The point I was referring to was the changes to the Blackpool FC squad layout that you altered on 20:29, 10 July 2019, but you have a look at one or two other clubs and their squad is laid out the way I originally changed the Blackpool one to (by position). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blackpool_F.C.&action=history Smithy53 (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So will you be checking other football clubs player squads to make sure that they in alphabetical order? If not it seems pointless that you changed the changes I made as it would seem that there is no right or wrong way for the squads names to be listed. Smithy53 (talk) 18:02, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox timestamps[edit]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 20:38, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Blackpool F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Cullen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]