User talk:Dragoliz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi. I noticed that an image you uploaded, Image:WhyPaintCats.jpg, was not tagged with a license. You appear to have removed the Orphanbot notice on your talk page, so I am placing this notice here as a reminder. For now, I have gone ahead and tagged the image with {{Book cover}}. If you have more specific information on the image's copyright status (if it is available under a less restrictive license), please feel free to update the image. Thanks! MostAwesomeDude / Be excellent / Party on, dudes! 08:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WhyPaintCats.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:WhyPaintCats.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination of Why Paint Cats for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Why Paint Cats is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why Paint Cats until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Cavalry (Message me) 02:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]