User talk:Dr. Eggman
Signature[edit]
If you are going to have your signature go to an article, put a link to your talk page into it as well. It is a pain in the ass to try and find it as it is, and whether or not it is against a specific policy it is certainly irritating. The point of signatures is " facilitates discussion by helping other users to identify the author of a particular comment, to navigate talk pages, and to address specific comments to the relevant user(s), among other things", and at least one of the links in it should go to your user page or your talk page. --Fastfission 14:46, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Morgawr.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Morgawr.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Kikuo.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Kikuo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 03:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Nomination of Abramis Academic Press for deletion[edit]
A discussion has begun about whether the article Abramis Academic Press, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abramis_Academic_Press until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Abramis Academic Press for deletion[edit]
The article Abramis Academic Press is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abramis Academic Press until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 10:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)