User talk:Dpurcyhoff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dpurcyhoff, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Dpurcyhoff! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Dpurcyhoff, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

One track editing[edit]

SPA much? --Pete (talk) 17:35, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Stephanie Miller Show. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reverting is not a way forward. You want to achieve something, do it within our guidelines, and it has to start with secondary sources. So far, as Skyring noted above, you are editing as if you're either an intern at the show or at the show's PR agency. Drmies (talk) 01:34, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am simply a fan of the show nothing more. I used many secondary sources in the article that were removed. Could you please explain why this article has caught your attention and your role with Wikipedia? Dpurcyhoff (talk) 01:46, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I'm a producer with SM Show. We'd like to know why these heavy deletions were made. The team worked hard to clean the page with edits approved by Ms. Miller. Contact me for verification. SMShowProducer is our wiki account SMShowProducer (talk) 02:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what SMShowProducer is all about. The producers of the SM Show have had nothing to do with the editing of the show page. I have made most of the editorial changes on the page over the past 6 months (except the massive deletions that were made today which I am not happy about). I have nothing to do with the show other than being a fan. These changes were not done by Stephanie Miller or her team and in fact it is my understanding that the individuals or entities that an article are about are not allowed to have control over the content - and I can assure you they haven't. Dpurcyhoff (talk) 03:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content disputes need to be resolved in discussion. If one editor adds content to an article which is subsequently removed by another editor, the next step is to follow WP:BRD and engage in discussion on the article's talk page to see if you are able to establish a consensus to re-add the disputed content. You should focus on the content, not the other editors, and explain how its inclusion complies with relevant policies or guidelines. For example, if content is removed from an article because it could not be verified by a citation to a realiable source, then the burden is upon the person wanting to add the information to fix that problem before re-adding it. If content is removed because its not worded in a neutral manner, then the burden is upon the person wanting to include it to word things more appropriately. Edit warring will never work and may result in accounts being blocked, so unless you absolutely 100% sure that what you're reverting is vanadalism, your best way forward is to engage in discussion on the article's talk page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dpurcyhoff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]