User talk:Doyleb23

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hotel Costes, Etage 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hotel Costes, Etage 3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Rooves

Thanks for your thoughts; I agree with many of your points. However, I feel that rooves is archaic, or, for some people, a mistake that assumes roof should be pluralized in the same way as hoof. In any event, rooves is missing from many good dictionaries, such as Cambridge International (I think even Kiwis are allowed to use that one), so what is the point of having rooves in WP, except in quotations? Many readers will be thrown by this spelling and/or pronunciation , and that's not the purpose of an encyclopedia; the fewer bumps in the road, the better. Nor is the purpose of WP to allow editors to see how close they can skate to the thin edge of the ice. If you think about the readers of WP, it's a pretty simple decision to use roofs, which is clearly the universally accepted form of the word. Chris the speller (talk) 15:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

You are getting rather carried away by the precise wording of my edit summary; it was meant as an indicator to editors who are reviewing changes to WP so they can decide if closer inspection is necessary, not as an essay. In general, WP should use the better form of a word; everybody understands what roofs are. If you feel that rooves should appear in "Nouns with multiple plurals", I don't object; I did, however, object to its being listed in the section that implied that the two forms were equivalent or of equal merit. Chris the speller (talk) 01:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)