User talk:Dorg2994

Page mover access[edit]

You don't have the required 6 months experience and 3000 edits. Given your first edit was to ~~request~~ demand that I provide it to you, I am certainly not going to now. James086^Talk 05:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hit Special:UserRights/Dorg2994 Dorg2994 (talk) 05:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Since a friend of yours is extremely keen that you become an admin and a bureaucrat, I'll helpfully suggest you read WP:NOTNOW. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 20:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Please do not continue the discussion at my user page. I will not give you the admin or bureaucrat tools. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You give bureaucrat and admin tools Dorg2994 (talk) 14:57, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. To qualified candidates who pass the relevant elections. You do need to do some reading my friend. Try Wikipedia:Guide_to_requests_for_adminship#General_advice_for_nominees and WP:NOTNOW. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You click Special:UserRights/Dorg2994 Dorg2994 (talk) 09:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

These continued requests for adminship and bureaucratship are a breach of WP:ICAN'THEARYOU and you are beginning to become disruptive. You are also breaching WP:SOCK by using multiple IP addresses for your campaign. I will begin issuing blocks to this account and IP addresses if this continues. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Volt Musician (July 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see also Wikipedia's general inclusion guideline to learn what sorts of topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thanks,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Volt Musician and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 12:50, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dorg2994, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 12:50, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being the already blocked User:Diamese, and for not being here to build an encyclopedia otherwise. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]