User talk:Donenne

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Donenne, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mww113 (talk) 07:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Donenne, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Donenne! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Kek (mythology). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. I see you've been warned for this before. Doug Weller talk 19:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was no personal attack. --Donenne (talk) 03:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There most assuredly was.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Donenne. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Philip Green‎, you may be blocked from editing. Roxy, the dog. barcus 05:20, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Philip Green. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning[edit]

You are edit warring to include inappropriate material in a WP:BLP and posting aggressive and insulting edit summaries[1] and templates, accusing another user of various ridiculous stuff. I did a double take when I saw this version: "inside his daughter"?? Do you kiss your mother with that mouth? Anything like any of that again, and you will be blocked. Bishonen | talk 08:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry Bish but how is that edit summary aggressive? In what world can citing Wikipedia Policy to a user in an edit summary in order to avoid them from vandalising an article be considered aggressive? Physically assaulting someone is aggressive. Shouting verbal abuse and threatening someone's life is aggressive.This edit summary is not aggressive. Secondly, I thought I had written inside a relationship with his daughter, and I corrected the mistake once it was reverted. I think you need to start assuming some WP:GOODFAITH. --Donenne (talk) 09:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In a world where the user you called a vandal is just upholding wikipedia policy. Read WP:BLP again (ha), wp:vandal and wp:npa though I suspect you know them very well. -Roxy, the dog. barcus 09:58, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you didn't physically assault Roxy, you only implied he had hidden nefarious reasons for removing your BLP violation ("Just because you might know Phillip Green IRL")? That's obviously fine then. And you say "inside his daughter" was a typo for "inside a relationship with his daughter", which isn't even English. See, that I do not believe. AGF is not a suicide pact. Don't do it again. Bishonen | talk 10:15, 19 August 2018 (UTC).[reply]

English is not my first language though it is my preferred language for correspondence. Try using Hebrew. --Donenne (talk) 10:45, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Varför skulle jag använda hebreiska? Det här är ju engelska Wikipedia. Bishonen | talk 15:26, 19 August 2018 (UTC).[reply]

For the record, I do not know Green IRL. I cannot remember if I have edited this article, though it is quite possible. I have strong opinions about him. -Roxy, the dog. barcus 17:39, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note the special rules for biographies[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | talk 10:18, 19 August 2018 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Donenne. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Donenne. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mullah Muhammad Rasul.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mullah Muhammad Rasul.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 04:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]