User talk:Donald Trung/Archive 68

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

17:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 21

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-23

Wikidata weekly summary #471

20:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Hi Donald, thanks for erasing the offensive content on my user talk page in Catalan Wikipedia. It is an IP of a banned sockpuppet on Vietnamese Wikipedia. He's been using IP to write many articles, some of whose name do not comply with the policy. Me trying to correct those names probably drove him mad, that's why I received those offensive insults. Anyways, thanks again. Hope you have a nice day. Băng Tỏa 11:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
@Băng Tỏa:, I am familiar with the person, they are a prolific Flickr user (that are unfortunately blacklisted on Wikimedia Commons because of dishonest attribution and licensing), they are very active on Wikimedia Commons and I am currently monitoring three (3) active socks by them (generally good edits and have reverted some bad ones), usually he only gets foul as an IP and not with his logged accounts. I saw him vandalise the page "User talk:Lệ Xuân" on this Wikipedia, but noticed that his insults on the Catalan-language Wikipedia weren't removed so I did it as I hoped that you wouldn't have to read it.
Anyhow, he has a lot of good edits and I hope that he can return to Wikipedia one day if he learns his mistakes, but he simply refuses to listen to others and collaborate properly with fellow volunteers. :-( --Donald Trung (talk) 22:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: May 2021





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikidata weekly summary #472

20:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Editing news 2021 #2

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Junior contributors comment completion rate across all participating Wikipedias
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

  • Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
  • The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Undelete can't be given to non-admins

A "Page viewers" user group won't happen. For legal reasons only admins can see deleted content. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 23:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz:, but why? There is nothing inherently special about admins as they also come in different levels (Checkusers, Bureaucrats, Stewards, Etc.), technically elections like these can also be held for "Page viewers" and they can also be "confirmed by the WMF". Admins simply have more tools, they are not an anointed special race that are above others and your proposal for "Maintainers" also would've delegated a lot of admin powers to a new user group. Note that it's not the ability to undelete, only to view deleted items. --Donald Trung (talk) 07:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Checkuser and Bureaucrat are roles that technically can be given to someone who is not an admin. And this is exactly why "maintainers" wouldn't have had undelete. It's due to copyright. People who patrol and clean up copyright violations get undelete because they need it. Nobody else. It's just a legal issue. Access to copyright violations has to be very strictly controlled. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 11:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz:, but Page viewers also wouldn't have undelete, at most they can nominate a page for undeletion like how a new user could nominate an existing page for deletion, but they can't share copyright violations anymore than any other user can, just view them. Page viewers can't restore anything, just see what's deleted.
"People who patrol and clean up copyright violations get undelete because they need it." This is for people that need access to currently deleted items but can't undelete them themselves, that would still be up to admins. --Donald Trung (talk) 11:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
It's not about sharing. They are not allowed to have access to copyright violations. Who can undelete doesn't matter, non-admins are not allowed to have access to deleted content or Wikimedia could legally be judged as a private file sharing site. This is a legal limitation, not a consensus issue. Just forget this. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 12:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz:, ah, I am somewhat genuinely surprised that there is a legal distinction between admins and non-admins as we usually hear that "admins are just users with extra tools" but this is apparently untrue? What qualifies admins to be different in the eyes of the law? Is it their ability to delete content? --Donald Trung (talk) 12:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
I'm not really sure what the law says, but I roughly know the WMF guidelines. (no idea if/where they are written down) Compare fair use law and WP:NFCC. People with undelete have to be thoroughly vetted and they have to actively help maintain the site. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 12:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
See also: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Blockers (which I think is a horrible idea, but does show the technical ability to give currently exclusive admin rights to other (new) user groups). --Donald Trung (talk) 08:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Going over it again I think that I misworded the proposal, largely because it started as "an afterthought", these users can only see deleted pages but not edit or undelete them, they have a "Request undeletion" button that opens an undeletion request like a "Nominate for deletion" button does the opposite. The pages won't be visible to anyone other than users with this right until a page has been undeleted by an admin. --Donald Trung (talk) 08:06, 21 June 2021 (UTC)