User talk:DonCalo/Archive 2010

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Autoreviewer[edit]

Hi DonCalo, I just read one of your articles at newpage patrol, and was surprised to see that an editor who has been contributing articles since 2006 hadn't already been approved as an wp:Autoreviewer. So I've taken the liberty of rectifying that. ϢereSpielChequers 14:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Africo panorama.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Africo panorama.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:27, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've re-added the missing rationale tag to this image, as it was removed without there being a rationale added. For direction on how to create a proper rationale, please see WP:FURG. Do not remove this tag without providing a fair use rationale. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring over the issue will achieve nothing. The image has been deleted for the reasons which were twice explained to you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborations between the United States government and Italian Mafia[edit]

Hi DonCalo -- I noticed that you added to an article I recently created, Placido Rizzotto. I then saw from your user page that you seem to be interested in labor union leaders, Socialist movements, etc who have fought against the Mafia. As I'm sure you're aware, the United States government played a large role in working with the Mafia to fight these socialist movements, both in Italy and the United States. I have created a new article called Collaborations between the United States government and Italian Mafia, to catalogue important events in this area. If you have time, I'd love to have your help working on it. It's only a stub right now, but I've got a few books listed as sources to start out with. Looking forward to working with you! -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 03:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I took the liberty of fixing the "Leave me a new message" link at the top of your talk page here -- it was still pointing to your old user talk page (Mafia Expert). Hope you don't mind. Jrtayloriv (talk) 03:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use image on Salvatore Miceli[edit]

Hello. I notice you restored File:Salvatore Miceli-en.jpg to Salvatore Miceli. Please note that our WP:NFCC policy prohibits the use of fair use images when free content could be created. While Mr. Miceli is in custody, he is not permanently imprisoned at this time. Therefore, creating a free alternative is possible. The Wikimedia Foundation has taken a prohibition stance with regards to non-free imagery of living people being used for depiction purposes, as you are attempting here. Please see Foundation:Resolution:Licensing policy. I am re-removing this image from the article. Please do not place the image on the article again. If you have questions regarding this issue and wish further input, you may take up the issue at WT:NFC or WP:NFCR. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salvatore Miceli-en.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Salvatore Miceli-en.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Missing fair use rationales for a number of images[edit]

I have reviewed the images you have uploaded and I have noticed a number of files specify that they are being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. I have listed all the files below. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged as missing this fair use rationale, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page.

I've observed that previously you failed to provide a rationale for File:Africo panorama.jpg, and removed the tag indicating it was missing a fair use rationale twice from that image. Subsequently, the image was deleted for failing to have a rationale. Please understand that removing the missing fair use rationale tag from these images will not result in these images being kept, and further that removing such tags without providing the rationales constitutes vandalism of the project. Do NOT remove the missing fair use rationale tags without providing a proper rationale. Please see WP:FURG for direction on how to create such a rationale.

The images are as follows:

If you have questions, ask. Simply reverting the tagging of these images will not be productive. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Replaceable fair use File:Nicola Panaro.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Nicola Panaro.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Licio Gelli and Propaganda Due[edit]

What are you, DonCalo, some kind of professional criminal or Mafioso yourself?

No, the information I added to Licio Gelli and Propaganda Due about both of those entities still being in existence is NOT incorrect, as a matter of fact it is quite correct, and the Monte Carlo Propaganda Due lodge is being more exposed every day.

I am reverting it back, and am quite ready to ask other editors for assistance in combating your Wiki-washing reverts if necessary.

Don't you DARE undo my hard work with a "please don't introduce incorrect information" generic message, this is an IMPORTANT topic.

Good day to you, sir.

76.89.199.202 (talk) 13:54, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:Antonino Giuffre.jpg[edit]

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hey[edit]

Hi,

We interacted briefly about Jewish Organized Crime. Thats not the reason for this message tho. I see you are knowledgeable about Organized Crime. I rewrote the East Harlem Purple Gang article. I just cant find any reference as to how they disintegrated at the end of the 1970's. If you could take a look, and see if you can improve it, or just comment on it. Cheers! Meishern (talk) 10:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capo mandamenti[edit]

I can understand your point of view. However, this info came from a very recent government report, so it is mostly accurate. We can update the tables as new reports come in.Kurzon (talk) 20:24, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Nino Salvo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Nino Salvo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Avicennasis @ 07:19, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination for Maria Serraino[edit]

Hi. I have reviewed your DYK nomiantion of Maria Serraino and have identified what I believe to be several near-insurmountable problems, requiring a major rewrite of the article. Please see the nomination discussion for a full explanation. - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mafia and Sicilian Mafia[edit]

How people can write an article or propose to move it without knowing about what they are talking about? --Theirrulez (talk) 00:09, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mafia[edit]

If it makes you happy to revert me, be my guest, I don't especially care. However, move requests are supposed to be closed by uninvolved admins—like me—and "consensus" on Wikipedia does not mean "unanimity". Indeed, it's quite uncalled for when someone who is involved in the move request misuses the rollback tool to revert a proper closing of the discussion and then declares that there is no consensus. Ucucha 18:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on my talk page. I also brought up this matter at ANI. Ucucha 19:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mafia move follow-up[edit]

You recently participated in a move request of Mafia. Since the final location of the page was not settled, please discuss it at Talk:Mafia (disambiguation) if you care. — AjaxSmack 02:41, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Mariano Agate.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mariano Agate.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marcello Dell'Utri[edit]

I found your roll back rather rude. I didn't mess up old fact with new sources. If you you want to discuss this please do so on the talk page of Marcello Dell'Utri. Otto (talk) 11:20, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

How many articles on Italian organized crime groups on Wikipedia are there?

or there any more that I missed from the list Thanks --JoeyBR (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Corleonesi clan[edit]

  • Which Mandamento does the Corleonesi clan work under in Palermo? The leaders came from Corleone sicily.

Thanks --JoeyBR (talk) 22:28, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am interested in your story about Giuseppe Coluccio. I was wondering what if a person wanted to write to him? How could they get the address to do that? Your stories are awesome. Great work.

Dawn Hanlin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.139.66 (talk) 03:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1900 map of mafia activity[edit]

I've seen references to a map made in 1900 by Antonio Cutrera that shows Sicilian towns with mafia activity. I downloaded a Google scan of his book, "La mafia e i mafiosi", but couldn't find any map in it. Where should I look? Kurzon (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://openlibrary.org/books/OL20556128M/La_Mafia_e_i_mafiosi_origini_e_manifestazioni
http://openlibrary.org/books/OL20556128M/La_Mafia_e_i_mafiosi_origini_e_manifestazioni Kurzon (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've decided to purchase a copy of Cutrera's book for myself. If you saw this map, what was the cover design of the edition you saw it in? I do not want to accidentally buy a copy that doesn't have the map. Kurzon (talk) 11:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did the edition you read have a yellow border with a white centre? Kurzon (talk) 15:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Protection rackets[edit]

I know little of protection rackets beyond what I read in books about the Mafia. Some of the things I read may be distinctively Sicilian and may not appear in other cases (eg yakuza). If I read studies of protection rackets outside Italy, I will expand the main article further.Kurzon (talk) 16:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Camorra clans[edit]

Hi, I'm working on List of Camorra clans page. Just wanted to known if there were are any Camorra clans operating in these Province's.

Thanks for your help. --JoeyBR (talk) 23:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Siderno Group[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mapping the Mafia[edit]

I managed to get a scan of Cutrera's map. Do you know of any other similar maps of Mafia density, particularly ones that are public domain?

Also, I'm trying to compile a list of all known existing Mafia clans in Sicily. I've already made a few tables based on reports from the DIA, but it's far from comprehensive. Do you know where I can get more info? Do you think this is a worthwhile endeavor?Kurzon (talk) 16:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice scan. Surely there are more recent maps, I have seen several in books. However, I don't know of maps in the public domain. I will try to find some. About the existing Mafia clans, that is not always easy. Clans come and go, and you will never catch them all, and some are not really relevant. I would say: try to list the most prominent ones. - DonCalo (talk) 10:21, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gambetta made a map in The Sicilian Mafia: The Business of Private Protection that compiled information from 1874, 1900 and 1987. The 1874 stuff came from Relazioni dei Prefetti Siciliani al Ministro degli Interni, from a book by a certain "Russo". Have you seen this book, and does it have a map?Kurzon (talk) 11:37, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, don't know any Russo. - DonCalo (talk) 18:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went to a library and got a better scan for free. The book I paid 40 euros for changed the color scheme of the map and ruined the key. I should complain to the publishers (Arnaldo Forni Editore).Kurzon (talk) 00:41, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao[edit]

Ciao Don... I see you're checking my latest additions about DC's exponents, many of them, in a way or another, connected to mafia (especially the nice members of Andreotti's corrente :D). Can you help with my English where you've left the Copyedit markup? Grazie e buon divertimento. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amintore Fanfani[edit]

Sorry, but your paragraph in Amintore Fanfani sounds hopelessly as WP:Original Research. I think it could be solved by putting there a complete quote of the original source. What do you think? Ciao. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 18:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see as if you're taking it as personal. I've nothing about Fanfani and honestly I don't know exactly what was his policy (aside from personal enrichment). I am speaking of what Wikipedia requires. In the end, if you think it's properly sourced, I think it should be a bit revised to show itself less POV. Anyway... --'''Attilios''' (talk) 07:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Giuseppe_De_Felice.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Giuseppe_De_Felice.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 03:36, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:De Gasperi.JPG[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:De Gasperi.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:58, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vito Cascioferro review[edit]

Hello, several of the images in the article have checked out as public domain during the GA review of the article, However, File:Vito Cascioferro2.jpg fails the fair use argument as a free image of the subject already exists (the 1902 mug shot) and has been nominated for deletion. If you can find evidence that the image was taken in Italy, then this may be able to take advantage of their shorter copyright term (see Template:PD-Italy). KimChee (talk) 00:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear KimChee, I tried to answer some of your suggestions. I do noy always agree, but highly appreciate your comments. Thank you for making the effort. - DonCalo (talk) 15:10, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I hope you don't mind the review coming in segments. I do want to be thorough. KimChee (talk) 15:51, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't mind the review coming in segments, but I will be not available for a couple of weeks starting next week. - DonCalo (talk) 16:04, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, but the review process let me to look at the article again and I made some changes. I realize that does not make your job easier. You can check the changes since you last edit here: [1]. - DonCalo (talk) 22:33, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is perfectly fine and I have taken them into account for the next step. GA review typically allows a week for improvements to the article. KimChee (talk) 02:21, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for being busy for a few days. I do have a question regarding standardization of English: most of your sources are taken from American sources and "honor" is the equivalent spelling in American English. If Cascioferro's activities in the English-speaking world occurred in the United States, it is recommended to be consistent with the American standard. (see WP:TIES) KimChee (talk) 08:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I will keep the GA review on hold as long as I can or until you are able to respond to the summary for final improvements. Good work so far. KimChee (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good to see you back. The updated article has passed review. KimChee (talk) 14:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Vito Cascioferro2.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Vito Cascioferro2.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Invalid fair use claim (#F7) as a free version exists

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. KimChee (talk) 00:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Turcao.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Turcao.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:33, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Turcao.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Turcao.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Buscetta's testimony[edit]

Do you know where I can get a transcript of Tommaso Buscetta's interviews and testimonies to Falcone? Or, for that matter, of other pentiti such as Calderone?Kurzon (talk) 10:58, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Antonio Petrus Kalil. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, DonCalo. You have new messages at SarekOfVulcan's talk page.
Message added 22:59, 20 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Turcao.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Turcao.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turcao.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Turcao.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work[edit]

Just want to say I'm a big fan of your work.Kurzon (talk) 23:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DonCalo/Archive_2010&oldid=1146450023"