User talk:Dom58!

Do not blank pages, as you did with Charlie Owen (Guitarist), this is considered vandalism and may result in being blocked from editing wikipedia. Improbcat 19:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

consider changing your evil ways[edit]

Your contributions do not reflect your membership in the various organisations of which you claim to be a part. If you would like to contribute seriously please demonstrate your desire and ability to do so. Otherwise, please discontinue your childish vandalism...please. Wiki is a nice community, but only if you let it. Honestly its more fun to do a good job on an article than to blank pages and call people names.Cronholm144 05:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging for deletion[edit]

I noticed you trying to tag Vfb the florist for deletion, and thought you could use some links... These are the various templates for tagging articles for speedy deletion- make sure that the article meets the criteria for speedy deletion!... Here are the templates for warnings to place on the creator's talk page after you've tagged an article, so they'll understand what was wrong with the article. Remember to be nice... most of our speedies are just people who've mistaken Wikipedia for MySpace, and aren't malicious. Feel free to ask me if you have questions. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Aspirantate of Don Bosco Missionary Seminary[edit]

You tagged this one as {{db-empty}}, but it didn't fit the definition- it wasn't a very short article with no context. That's probably a notable school, so it doesn't need to be speedy-deleted, just to be improved and sourced. We only speedy-delete articles that can't be improved. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Ashok K. Chauhan[edit]

You tagged this one as {{db-nonsense}}, but it wasn't nonsense; it was quite easy to read and understand. It's about a person who may or may not be notable; we shouldn't speedy it until we give the author the chance to demonstrate notability. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New York Junior Football Championship[edit]

That's closer, but still the wrong tag. {{db-empty}} is just for entries that are blank, or have just a few words, or just say the title again. For an article that explains itself but doesn't explain how it's notable, you can use {{db-bio}}. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Dangyodeebo[edit]

Your tone in this warning is kind of harsh, and doesn't include either a link to the deleted article or a link to the policy it violates. It would be smart to use the standard warning templates instead. -FisherQueen (Talk) 20:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor of Immortality[edit]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

GreenJoe 17:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense[edit]

Please do not tag articles with the nonsense tag that are obviously not nonsense articles, such as you did with Milka, such edits are considered vandalism and you may receive a temporary block from Wikipedia if you continue with them. Ben W Bell talk 10:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ben W Bell talk 12:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is you labelling things as nonsense when they aren't, [1]. And this edit is you adding nonsense [2]. Ben W Bell talk 10:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And for this edit [3], you are getting another warning for vandalism. If you vandalise again or add nonsense to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Ben W Bell talk 10:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What does "Dom" mean?[edit]

I know you say you are not a sockpuppet, but to see similar contributions from Dom56! and this new Domgang02, on the same articles on the same day, it seems hard to believe. An admin can run a checkuser to prove it either way. What do you say? Wikidan829 19:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxen[edit]

I have no idea how to create userboxes, you're on your own there. Improbcat 19:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, then, I'll ask other people. Dom58! 08:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have an interest in helping peopel make userboxes, but it's not an activiy I plan to actually learn the markup for. Anyway, do you mind if I raid your userboxes and do some Copy and Past coding Mathiastck 09:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 seems to work, why not "{{User George Bush}}"

George Bush[edit]

Why are you trying to promote George Bush on wikipedia? Mathiastck 15:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You...[edit]

I think you are a horrible person. I really don't want to cause Wikihate but I don't like the way you are. You insult the president. you insult me, you are all fancy with your achives! It makes me sick! Ooohh, look at me, I have an Archive 01! It's so annoying. Don't you realise this? Dom58! 17:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, dude, what is wrong with you? Because I state a FACT that President Bush said the word "misunderestimated" which, as of 5/24/2007 doesn't exist in the English language, a little too much truth for you? Now you're trying to bash me because I decided to utilize a feature that the wonderful Wikipedia coders made for us? What the hell is wrong with you? Wikidan829 17:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude seemed appropriate considering your childish behavior. How old are you anyway? You're only angering yourself. At least I can look "dude" up in the dictionary and get a definition. This conversation is over. Wikidan829 17:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You both please read This Thank you.Arnon Chaffin ^{Got a message?} 18:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mercy...[edit]

Please unblock me. I was just trying to prove a point. Plus, I'm NOT a sock puppet! Please unblock me, all I want to do is be a good wikipedian. I won't be disruptive again! PLEASE! Dom58! 10:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dom58! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was only proving a point. Please unblock me, I really want to help this great wikipedia. Please, I beg, please unblock me, or at least set a deadline!

Decline reason:

No, do not disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point. — -- John Reaves (talk) 10:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have tried[edit]

Hi goerge i left a mesage on the person who blocked you's page

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dom58! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept that I have been really stupid, but please can you at least set me an expiring date. I really Love Wiki, and I hate the fact that I am blocked. Maybe, If i am bad after you unblock me, you can then ban me indefinately. I would accept that. Please, find it in your warm hearts to forgive me.

Decline reason:

I simply see too much evidence of sockpuppetry and disruption to unblock.— Isotope23 16:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sob[edit]

Guys, I have not edited the great wiki for almost a year, and i want to be unblocked so i can reform. i want to jazz up my page, and i swear,i will NEVER be stupid again on the greatness of wiki. PLEASE, I BEG you to unbock me. Dom58! (talk) 17:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

all wikipedians are nob heads who should resign and close the wiki. stop ignoring me, frackingjniohn;dfngjifd tio3=12 8 ncfgh etrjkrtjgrei CRAP! 04980 IFJVO;FGIEROIFGEGJIO PAY ME ATTENTION21 VJIF IJFGGIJSFDIHBNB SHIT GBFBJHFGIOGFBHGIFJHGIFHNJNM

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dom58! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have learnt my lesson and i have made constructive edits, eg. oscar's orchestra page was created by me. I always tried to do the right thing and will be a good wikipidian. Why don't you unblock me an then you can quickly block me again if you get any more nonsense from me. PLEASE, i beg you. wiki is great

Decline reason:

First, you should be requesting unblock at your main account; second, no one is going to unblock a community-banned user without another community discussion. And really, I don't see any likelihood that consensus on that one will change. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I might as well give up then.

Invitation[edit]

Introducing WikiProject United States Government...[edit]

Hello Dom58!,

Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief.

Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying.

Thanks in advance, « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 21:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [reply]

This message has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot on behalf of WikiProject United States Government.
You have received it because you are a member of a related WikiProject or you have said you are interested in your userspace.
Message written by Leonard^Bloom and Diligent Terrier.

Help us get the project off the ground and flying.