User talk:Dolfrog/Archives/2015 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Upgrade process under discussion and User:Zad page
Hello User:Dolfrog; Your edits at Alexia and Dyslexia appeared not to know about the page upgrade discussion on these pages presently taking place at the Talk page at User:Zad 68. You are welcome to join us, and to let us know your thoughts prior to further edits to the article which would be to save time and redundant edits. Cheers. FelixRosch (TALK) 19:22, 31 December 2014 (UTC) There is no place for this ignornce which is not based in research just your personal opinions dolfrog (talk) 20:23, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Alexia (condition) and Dyslexia. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
- If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, doing so without constructive discussion on the relevant Talk page is very likely to lead to a block. FelixRosch (TALK) 19:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
May be you should hold these discussions on the articles talk pages and not in a provate user page discussion. This is not wikipedia practice more aboutg doscussing your personal opinions. which are not basedd on international research. And from what I have seem is more about the marketing of various group ideas not improving the articles content using international research. So yopur changes are inliner with wikipedia practice but more discussing your ownj provate opinions in private and not on the various articles diacussion pages with other users / editors dolfrog (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
dyslexia
want to give me a hand with the article? please let me know at my talk page--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thanks, I have already begun, help in any way you can if I see a typo ill come along and take care of it, give me advice on everything thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:10, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
hi/ dyslexia
I got your message, we took the article to GA , however if there are any changes needed please go right ahead, ill help too. let me know, I hold your opinion in high esteem, so again let me know what if needed, thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
All i can say is that I will not be adding a link to this nonsense on my own Useful Dyslexia Links web page so out of touch with international research. Acquired dyslexia and developmental dyslexia terminology all mixed up. Too much to correct dolfrog (talk) 12:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
"we took the article to GA" Just goes to show how little those who reviewed the article know about the international research regarding dyslexia and the two very different types of dyslexia. dolfrog (talk) 12:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- I received your email and links, I will start tomorrow to integrate the information you sent....You could also have a look at the 2012 International Dyslexia Symposium, a meeting of international dyslexia researchers, and look at issues such as orthography and how dyslexia is language dependent. http://www.oxfordkobe.com/program.html ...I will do my best, I am very interested that you be happy with the article.thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- my types of auditory processing disorder also cause me to have very poor copy editing skills, which is one of the reasons why I now limit my contributions to searching for and suggesting the supportive research for article content. Just uploaded a web version of my desktop Mendeley research paper collections which were a 2011 project which includes a Developmental Dyslexia folder which you may find of some interest, if you can access it such a long time ago since i last used it https://www.mendeley.com/library/ dolfrog (talk) 14:47, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- my types of auditory processing disorder also cause me to have very poor copy editing skills, which is one of the reasons why I now limit my contributions to searching for and suggesting the supportive research for article content. Just uploaded a web version of my desktop Mendeley research paper collections which were a 2011 project which includes a Developmental Dyslexia folder which you may find of some interest, if you can access it such a long time ago since i last used it https://www.mendeley.com/library/ dolfrog (talk) 14:47, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- I received your email and links, I will start tomorrow to integrate the information you sent....You could also have a look at the 2012 International Dyslexia Symposium, a meeting of international dyslexia researchers, and look at issues such as orthography and how dyslexia is language dependent. http://www.oxfordkobe.com/program.html ...I will do my best, I am very interested that you be happy with the article.thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
I have looked at some possible references and will begin the process into this weekend--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 01:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Dolfrog, as I mentioned above I will be looking at the article (however im having to give additional attention to my job situation in real life so it might take me a little longer, hopefully this week will settle down)...thank you as always--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Ozzie real life comes first, which is why I currently have very little time to edit. However over the last weekend I updated my PubMed Dyslexia Review paper collections listed on my user page. They were origonally created back in 2011 for a teacher friend, who was helping our dyslexic sons. Take your time things done in a rush tend to go wrong lol. dolfrog (talk) 17:37, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
- Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
- Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
- Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
- Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
- Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
- Research coordinators: run reference services
Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)