User talk:Docker azza

WP:AFL[edit]

G'day azza, if you're a big footy fan I suggest you take a look at WikiProject AFL and also Category:Fremantle Dockers players. The discussion page is used for other users to send messages to you, and the user page is your space where you can write stuff about yourself, see User:ben.carbonaro for an example. If you have any questions mate, drop us a line on my talk page. Cheers, R o gerthat ^Talk 11:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Docker azza, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Hi again[edit]

G'day again mate, nice effort on Longmuir and Medhurst, I suggest you take a look at the Justin Longmuir page and see the changes I've made to the article so everything's formatted right etc. Keep it up, R o gerthat ^Talk 01:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFL season article naming convention[edit]

As a participant of WikiProject AFL I thought you might be interested in this. I have started a vote to get a consensus on the naming convention for AFL season articles. You can participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject AFL#AFL season article naming convention. Cheers. Remy B 13:28, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful with the "hawthorn" link[edit]

Hi!

I adopted the "Hawthorn" page and mid-November. No, not Hawthorn Football Club, but rather the disambiguation page. I spent a good long time finding all the linkk to the disambiguation page and correcting them. In the process, I learned altogether too much about various plant-eating butterflies, villages in England, and the AFL. It was actually quite fun. I still check back from time to time to find out if there are new incorrect links.

When you link to "Hawthorn," the people who use your page will also learn about the plant and about the villages in england, which is probably not what you want. Therefore, please link to "Hawthorn Football Club|Hawthorn" instead.

I did ask the butterfly guy to be more careful, and he has in fact done so, although he was completely against my idea of a match between the rugby players and the butterflies.

Thanks!

I notice that you use "Hawthorn Hawks|Hawthorn" a lot also. "Hawthorn Hawks" is a redirect: it's better to link to the base page rather than via a redirect, but I'm not trying to babysit the "Hawthorn Hawks" redirect, just the "Hawthorn" disambiguation page. If you get really inspired, you might think about fixing up all the redirects. It's boring work. First, go to "Hawthorn Hawks." you will be redirected to "Hawthorn Football Club." Then, click on the "Hawthorn Hawks" in the "redirected from" line at the top of the page. Then, click on "what links here" (in the left-hand border column" to see all the pages that are (improperly) using "Hawthorn Hawks." Go to each page and edit the links. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arch dude (talk • contribs) 01:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Proposed deletion of Centro Maddington[edit]

The article Centro Maddington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find sufficient notable independent, substantive, multiple RS coverage of the notability of this 28,000 sm mall on gnews or gbooks.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 07:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]