User talk:Doc77can

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Doc77can, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! MRSC (talk) 06:07, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Friern Barnet Urban District[edit]

When you create an article like Friern Barnet Urban District, please remember to include some text. A map and an infobox are optional extras: every article needs at the very least a lead sentence saying "X is a Y" to tell us what the subject is and why it merits an encyclopedia article (and so that if the article is found in a Google search etc there is a useful summarising first line to display). I've had a go here, but please expand it. Thanks. PamD 22:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urban districts formed in England and Wales 1896–1974, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waverley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urban districts formed in England and Wales 1894–95, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages County Borough of Sunderland and Wellington Rural District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boroughs incorporated in England and Wales 1835–1882, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page County Borough of Sunderland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rural districts formed in England and Wales 1894–1974, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages County Borough of Sunderland, Norton Rural District and Adur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of rural districts in England and Wales 1894–1930, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wellington Rural District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Districts etc[edit]

Shall we cooperate on the local government bodies articles? Creating the starter articles and 'looking up the details'/where the archives are is to my taste: but will upgrade any not otherwise seen to in groups later on. If you have any particular preferences let me know (and if you wish to make use of [1] feel free). Jackiespeel (talk) 14:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brent London Borough Council elections[edit]

Hello, I noticed that that you added 2 navigation templates and a sequence to each of the Brent London Borough Council election articles. I have removed the sequences from the articles as all the information is already included in the Brent London Borough Council election template that is just below there, with the template being superior as it allows movement to any years Brent council election, not just the previous election or the one after. Most of the English council election articles are moving to having navigation templates rather than sequences.

Also I see that you added United Kingdom elections and Council elections in London templates to the articles. Per WP:BIDIRECTIONAL normally navigation templates should only be added to articles that are included in the template, so although I have not removed them at the moment, I don't think they should be there. The Council elections in London template is fine in the main Brent London Borough Council elections template as that is linked in the template, but I don't think it should be included in the individual election articles and I don't think the United Kingdom elections template should be on any of them. Davewild (talk) 18:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks I was just trying to make sure all the London borough election pages were similarly set out and linked to one another. But if that's not the way Wikipedia election pages are normally set out I'll stop Doc77can (talk) 20:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem and thanks for working on them - please don't stop working them because of this, nice work on adding all the ward results to Barnet Council election, 1998 for instance. Davewild (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, one question I'm currently making the missing ward result maps for the 2002-2014 London elections, how do I show that they are a derivative work? Doc77can (talk) 21:29, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well an example from my latest ward result map is here, which shows how I am doing it (note as you'll see in the edit history I originally uploaded as my work and then quickly edited to show it is a derivative as I can't figure out an easy way to upload them straight as derivatives any more). If you have not already found it, User:Nilfanion/Elections is a very helpful page when creating these ward maps, although unfortunately the derivativeFX tool no longer works - that tool used to make it very easy to upload derivative maps. Davewild (talk) 21:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lewisham Council election, 2006, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist Alternative. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lewisham Council election, 2002, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist Alternative. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Barking and Dagenham Council election, 1986[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Barking and Dagenham Council election, 1986, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://us.wow.com/wiki/Barking_and_Dagenham_Council_election,_1998.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Barking and Dagenham Council election, 1994[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Barking and Dagenham Council election, 1994, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://dictionary.sensagent.com/Barking%20and%20Dagenham%20Council%20election,%201998/en-en/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those 2 copyright messages above[edit]

Hi Doc77can! Just a quick note, the bot saw a match with apparently mirrored versions of an article, so no worry there. One thing though, for future reference, anytime you re-use content from one article in another, we just need a comment to that effect in the edit summary, which keeps the "BY" part of CC-BY-SA happy. For these two, for example, just a small edit with the summary saying "Article created with content copied from [[Barking and Dagenham Council election, 1998]], see that page for attribution." You can remove the Coren Search Bot warning and use that summary for the 2 above articles, then a similar one for new articles on the first edit summary. Thanks for your work! Crow^Caw 20:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK done, thank you for the advice. Doc77can (talk) 19:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kensington and Chelsea Council election, 1994[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kensington and Chelsea Council election, 1994, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://us.wow.com/wiki/Kensington_and_Chelsea_Council_election,_1998.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:15, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Just wanted to say thank you for creating all the UK local election by year templates! Number 5 7 20:50, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS - be aware that a few articles are still at incorrect titles (i.e. not incorporating the full name of the councils), so best not to create any links such as Rugby Council election, XXXX - they will all be moved to the correct title in the next few days - e.g. Rugby Borough Council election, XXXX. Have slowly been going through and doing this for the past year, and nearly there! Cheers, Number 5 7 20:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PPS - when you're adding these templates, can you put them below the county ones - this is how they're normally laid out. Cheers, Number 5 7 22:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar and advice. Doc77can (talk) 16:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NI templates[edit]

Hi Doc77can. I saw you created templates for NI local elections based on the counties. I was previously thinking of doing this, and then realised that the council boundaries are completely different to council boundaries, with some councils overlapping more than one county. What I think might be better is to have one template for each council area (there are only 11 now) and include the merged councils on those instead, otherwise you'll end up with three templates on some pages (two county ones and one UK local elections one). This is what I've started doing for Scotland (see e.g. {{Aberdeen elections}}). Thoughts?

I was worried about the issue with the cross-county boundaries too, but felt the six counties were still viewed as the main sub-divisions of NI, similar to the ceremonial counties of England and the persevered counties of Wales. However if you feel having a template for each council area would be be better on election pages I wouldn't object. Doc77can (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have to confess that I am rather ignorant of how the traditional six counties are viewed in NI, but based my thoughts on a brief look at the history of local government in the province - unlike England, I'm not sure they have used counties as local government units - happy to be proved wrong though! Number 5 7 12:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No your right, the six counties haven't had any administrative function since the passing Local Government (Boundaries) Act (Northern Ireland) 1971 and Local Government Act (Northern Ireland) 1972. But I was worried since namings and boundaries can stir up a lot of feeling in NI topics, and I wanted to avoid getting into an edit war over this - I know that the Derry/Londonderry issue can be a hot topic. Doc77can (talk) 12:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well done for creating all the annual election templates, but I think you missed off Monmouthshire County Council! Number 5 7 22:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for pointing it out I completely missed it, fixed now. Doc77can (talk) 11:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

London Borough Council byelections 1964-68[edit]

I notice you've been maintaining the articles about local elections in the London Boroughs. I'm afraid the lack of mention of byelections in 1964-68 in the GLC Intelligence Department's 'London Borough Council Election Results, 1968' doesn't indicate that there were none, because they were never recording them at the time. There were in fact a total of 237 seats filled in byelections in this term, and each borough had at least one (Lambeth had only one, Hackney had 17). I have found the results of all but one.

I should also point out that the London Borough Councils had voting Aldermen until 1978 which sometimes made a difference to council control. I'm happy to send you the list of them. Sam Blacketer (talk) 17:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Merton London Borough Council election, 1982[edit]

The article Merton London Borough Council election, 1982 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pretty much no content here. WP:TNT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Dissident Aggressor 00:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

London Wiki[edit]

Would you be interested in helping over on London Wiki [2]? Sign in and change to Monobook if you want a WP-like layout. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:40, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 November[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of electoral wards in Greater London page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Just wanted to say thanks for creating all the articles on elections in defunct districts! Number 5 7 20:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, they're only stubs at the moment, I just wanted to fill in the gaps. Doc77can (talk) 15:30, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kingswood Borough Council elections

added a link pointing to Kingswood

Melton Borough Council elections

added a link pointing to Melton

Reading Borough Council elections

added a link pointing to Reading

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Districts replaced by unitary councils[edit]

Please can you link to the articles about the unitary councils, not to the counties please? e.g. Carrick was not replaced by Cornwall (as you had it), but by Cornwall Council. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK sorry, will fix it Doc77can (talk) 18:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've done a few already. DuncanHill (talk) 19:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Special Barnstar
	Just wanted to say thanks for the corrections/additions to the various council election templates! Number 5 7 22:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Doc77can (talk) 13:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Doc77can. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Doc77can. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Liberal Democratic Spotlight Team/meta/color[edit]

Template:Liberal Democratic Spotlight Team/meta/color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mélencron (talk) 16:45, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Liberal Democratic Spotlight Team/meta/shortname[edit]

Template:Liberal Democratic Spotlight Team/meta/shortname has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mélencron (talk) 16:45, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Doc77can. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of BBC home video releases for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of BBC home video releases is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of BBC home video releases until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --wooden superman 11:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Doc77can. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Doc77can. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:United Kingdom local elections, 1909[edit]

Template:United Kingdom local elections, 1909 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nominations[edit]

Just to let you know that I have nominated Template: United Kingdom local elections, 1961 and Template: United Kingdom local elections, 1962 for deletion as they are duplicates of existing templates. Feel free to discuss at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thanks, PinkPanda272 (talk/contribs) 14:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Former non-metropolitan districts of England[edit]

Template:Former non-metropolitan districts of England has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of electoral wards in Greater London for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of electoral wards in Greater London, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of electoral wards in Greater London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]