User talk:DoABarrelRoll.dev/Archive/May 2017

Please get consensus first.

Hello, I'm SomeWikiuser999. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to WP:VAND have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please get consensus before editing a policy page. —Preceding undated comment added 19:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

I don't quite think that warranted the whale template...

Yum! Delicious!

The whale you used to squish another Wikipedian has been sliced and served as Japanese sashimi.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that, just like the whale in the picture, you have overused your {{whale}}.

Crunch, crunch!

Here are some chips to go with your fish!

Warning

If you continue to mess around with policy pages you're going to get blocked. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:33, 6 May 2017 (UTC)}

@NeilN:

This user is sorry for things he has done in the past on Wikipedia, and is determined to make things right.

DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice) 05:40, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

The Fierra Fly Article

(Iamthebestthereis (talk) 08:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)) Hey barrel roll man i see what you mean the article was written in total unbias and was wrote from a neutral point of view but can definitely be re-wrote to be cleaned up a bit thanks!

Thanks for reminding me, very charming of you

Thank you

I do remember. Very much. My friend Shakil and I were discussing the Bandarban District. I turned to WP, and found a stub. I expanded it, without much verification, and never managed to really get back to it. But, I never really left WP. My operator gives me free WP. So, these days I read more than I edit or fight. I am too old and unsocial for the WP style of town hall fights, especially when I am editing from a tiny android phone. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 16:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Kirt or CaptainKirt

Hi, we appreciate your enthusiasm but serious, complex maintenance tasks such as patrolling and tagging new pages are not for beginners. Please do not tag pages until you have significantly more experience and have read and fully understood the tutorials. In the meantime however, and as soon as you have reached 200 mainspace edits, you will be able to enroll at the WP:CVUA to learn all about vandalism and how you can help combat it. It's a much easier process. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks very much

You are too kind, and I too undeserving. I'll give it a little polish and put it up on the shelf. :-)

Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

@Ser Amantio di Nicolao: No Problem :) DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice) 01:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:DoABarrelRoll.dev/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello! DoABarrelRoll.dev, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Stop attributing my fathers first son by another woman to my mother.

I am Cary Martin, the son of Dick Martin and Peggy Connelly. I am her only son. Richard was my father's son by another woman he knew before he married my mother. You are insulting her memory and if she were alive she'd probably sue you for attributing Richard to her. Please stop changing my corrections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.172.29.214 (talk) 00:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

My mother, Peggy Connelly, had one son, me, Cary Martin. My half brother Richard is not her son. I want her entry changed to the truth.

• The truth is hard to figure without sourcing, but I found a thing or two and changed both relevant articles. Drmies (talk) 00:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Googleplex at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:12, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Googleplex at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 11:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)