Archives[edit]

Welcome! Hello, Deepfriedokra/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Gflores ^Talk 22:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Franco[edit]

I'm not sure if the edits made ny an anon are . . . accurate. Don't know the subject well enough to revert on my own. Dlohcierekim 14:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You don't mention which edit. Did my recent edit take care of the issue. (FWIW, when referring to a particular edit, it is usually best to do a diff, then paste the URL of the diff so someone can see exactly what change you are referring to. So I could write "my recent edit". - Jmabel | Talk 17:04, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help Us Clean WP from Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath and His Crony[edit]

Hamsacharya Dan is back with his usual vandalism. Adityanath, the sysop on watch, is going on a holiday. Please see my Talk Page, Mahavatar Babaji Talk Page, and Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath Talk page to understand the situation that led me to you. We need your help and other sysops whom you might know.

Thank you so much.

No To Frauds 23:31, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, how'd you get sucked into this? I'm pretty sure this is less about vandalism and more about mastodons. I'm going to try to mediate; we'll see how far I get. Cheers, JDoorj a m Talk 06:33, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

It still amazes me how quickly these warning tags are being added these days...may I ask for a tip from you? How do you do this so quickly? BTW, I blocked the IP for an hour...if s/he returns, maybe post it on WP:AIV? --HappyCamper 13:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty slow when it comes to issuing warnings...I generally like to personalize everything on Wikipedia, so very often, I find that others are on the ball already. Here's something you'll probably find useful :-) --HappyCamper 15:52, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 2[edit]

Thanks for the vandalism revert on my userpage, much appreciated. --Cactus.man ✍ 14:14, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for reverting my userpage. That vandal's been a persistent bugger. Cheers, JDoorj a m Talk 14:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

blue panther[edit]

STOP reverting Blue Panther's page. We put it up FIRST, RESPECT IT. Her name is Blue Panther and studios know her as The Blue Panther. She has TWO names as musician and filmmaker. RESPECT THAT. If you keep reverting it, you are only wasting your time. (unsigned comment from Far2steep placed oon my user page.Dlohcierekim 02:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry[edit]

I had vandalized a page of my friends name to send to her then revert. after I sent her the link it showed that you had changed it so I assumed this was her user name. I vandalized your page as a joke to her, only to realize this was not her page. didn't mean to randomly hit your page, sorry.

Thanks[edit]

for cleaning up the vandalism I missed at Muslim. Cheers, Christopher Parham (talk) 00:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof![edit]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Dlohcierekim! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego ^talk 21:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV[edit]

Did you just post a request to have yourself blocked? If not, you put the name of the vandal in the template, like {{vandal|000.000.000}} or {{vandal|username}} substituting in the vandals IP or username.

Prodego ^talk 18:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes I wouldn't know, I never use the report feature of VandalProof, being an admin and all. Interesting it was me who checked that page, after all I did approve you for VandalProof. Prodego ^talk 18:37, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry[edit]

I jumped to revert the edit by 88.196.21.163 - but when I looked at the history it seems as if you were doing some VandalProof testing and it was intentional - oops. Oh well, my apologies. --Doug (talk) 17:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's alright then :). He did it again, I blatantvandal'd him (or her), sounds like s/he'll probably strike again though. Good luck! --Doug (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User: Sivius[edit]

Don't touch, revert or anything. I also agree where your user page says, "This user is pretty arrogant." – Sivius ^TALK 20:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alice in Chains[edit]

Sweet Alice is not considered a real album, so i feel that I must remove it from this website.

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article User:Dlohcierekim. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dlohcierekim 17:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Alice is not an album. It is not listed anywhere on any real music websites, from allmusic to amazon so it should be deleted. I insist, it is not vandalism

User:SimonRibeiro[edit]

I need guidance. Does the user page User:SimonRibeiro seem a little too vain and self-promoting, or am I just overly critical??

Thanks,

Dlohcierekim 20:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

People are allowed to write basically whatever they want on their userpages (unless it's a blatant violation of policy or something). User pages aren't like articlespace, they don't have to be NPOV or anything. See also WP:USER. --Rory096 22:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) --Rory096 04:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your vote![edit]

I'm a bit confused, however. You noted that "an admin should have a variety of [experiences], i.e. RfA and Arbcom." I have some RfA experience (unless you meant RfAr) but, unless I've brought an arbitration matter (or one was brought involving me), why would I have experience with ArbCom? Is my understanding that this is a small, select group of already promoted admins wrong? Radio Kirk talk to me 16:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your note, thank you. :) Radio Kirk talk to me 20:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]