@Diriector Doc: I see that you started adding instructions to the userboxes that you created, that is very smart since people keep on messing up Category:Userboxes. I added the instructions to almost all of the userboxes that you created. There is only one that I found hard to add the instuctions to, so you will have to do that yourself. The one that I had trouble with was the one with the two seadragon userboxes.Catfurball (talk) 21:14, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. I've been doing stuff for school these past few months, and then I didn't do much over the holidays, so that was a big help. Also, I will try to get the rest of your requests completed eventually.
Keep in touch, you know where to find me.--Diriector_Doc┝Talk Contribs━━━┥ 21:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Hartmut Möllring, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Need some help!
Can you help me with this? I would like it to show a userbox for only me, whichever page it’s in. Not using the rootpagename template, but detecting my username. Here’s the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlecat456 (talk • contribs) 10:22, March 12, 2020 (UTC)
@Littlecat456:, I've looked into it, and I'm not sure if what you're asking is possible. I think your best bet is the {{ROOTPAGENAME}} magic word. Sorry about that. --Diriector_Doc┝Talk Contribs━━━┥ 16:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to participate in the user feedback round for our desktop improvements prototype. This feedback is super valuable to us and is currently being used to determine our next steps. We have published a report gathering the main takeaways from the feedback and highlighting the changes we’ll make based on this feedback. Please take a look and give us your thoughts on the talk page of the report. To learn more about the project overall and the other features we’re planning on building in the future, check out the main project page.
Hello, Director Doc. I didn't know if you created user boxes or not, but I saw that you created Poydoo's user box today. I was wondering if you saw my requests, or not. I didn't want to be pushy, but I thought that you did a great job on Poydoo's user box, and so I was wondering if you could do my requests, or not. Thanks so much!
@I'm Aya Syameimaru!: Oh, yes. I am quite familiar with your work. Your expertise at CSS is genuinely an inspiration. My favourite ones are from your February collection. Keep up the great work. --Diriector_Doc┝Talk Contribs━━━┥ 21:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Of course! I«ias!|,,.|usbk»I 02:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Remove position: absolute
Please remove position: absolute from your signature immediately. It is causing your signature to appear at the top of the page. --Izno (talk) 14:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
That's strange. I don't seem to have any problems with it. I've been using it for almost a year now and you are the first person to have this issue. I've viewed it myself on numerous devices and all of them seem to display it without issue. I will look into fixing it, and if I get another query like yours, I will remove it until I find a compatible replacement. --Diriector_Doc┝Talk Contribs━━━┥ 18:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I see it in Timeless skin ([1]). While there may be an issue with the skin, it is also generally not good CSS to be setting inline elements to absolute. What effect are you trying to achieve?
Aside from that point, line breaks are also discouraged severely in WP:SIGAPP. You should remove yours. --Izno (talk) 18:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Ah, I see it. I use the Monobook skin. You can see how it is supposed to look using that skin. I'll get to fixing it ASAP. --Diriector_Doc (talk·contribs) — Using {{User}} for now 18:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, I checked in Vector after I left the note and it doesn't show up there either. Timeless is probably annoyed because of the CSS presumably necessary to implement responsiveness. --Izno (talk) 00:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Here's what it looks like for me. Note the the right pipe lands in the middle of "Contribs", which bleeds over into the timestamp. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 13:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you both for pointing out these issues. I have changed my signature and tested it out with multiple skins. It is still not perfect on Timeless, but at least it gets rid of the position:absolite problem. --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 14:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Control Z
Your recent editing history at Control Z shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.BradfordTalk 01:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
@Bradford: Are you kidding? The edit war regards you as well. I tried avoiding an edit war by taking the reasoning to the talk page, but that didn't work, you reverted the changes anyway. How am I in the wrong here? --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 01:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm sure it was a mistake, I just wasn't sure as to what you were doing. You are forgiven. --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 02:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Working Man's Barnstar
For the hard work you've done on making Userboxes for all of the community! Metric Supporter 89 (talk) 02:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Brawlhalla edits
Hey, you revised my thing about how Brawlhalla had most game sales. Although I probably shouldn't have used the world sales, I was trying to point out that Brawlhalla has the single biggest player base, more than any other fighting game out there, as you can see Smash Ultimate has only sold about 20 million copies from the link that you sent on that page. I was saying it had the most downloads/sales as a singular game, not as a franchise. Also out of curiosity are you anyone known in the community or just a random player like me?
@TCArk1234: It's really hard to determine fanbase size. A Brawlhalla fan can download the game 5 times on different devices whereas Smash players need to spend $70 every time they want a second copy, which is not likely anyway. 50 million players is a hefty milestone, for sure. However, you can not simply determine "most popular" from this statistic given all the variables.
I am not widely known in the Brawlhalla community per se. If you have to ask, that proves it. I occasionally stream Brawlhalla Speedruns on twitch. Not trying to brag, but I am fourth in the world for the Tournament Mode category. I also happen to be the top contributor on the Brawlhalla Gamepedia Wiki. That being said, no one knows who I am. --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 03:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
.jpg)
