User talk:Dicting

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Dicting and welcome to the English Wikipedia!. I'm known here as Tohd8BohaithuGh1, and welcome to Wikipedia! We are all here very glad that you have registered. Before you start making any major edits, I suggest you check out the links listed below. They'll really help!

Important Pages[edit]

Have fun![edit]

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! A few things to remember:

We can't say it enough, but welcome!!! --Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 19:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


backup of Chinese version[edit]

w:zh:User:糾正

The late contributions of w:zh:User:糾正 are similar to that of the indef-blocked user w:zh:User:十字军大屠杀 and his/her sock-puppet, in which involving of posting his/her viewpoints about the Western and Christian on the village pump and some other's talk pages, and adding some disputed sentences to some good articles. Please check, thanks! --CDIP No.150 repair meter 17:01, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Checkuser data is periodically purged to protect users' privacy, and 十字军大屠杀's data is no longer available. —{admin} Pathoschild 05:12:13, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
: Or check with one of his/her past socks, see also Steward requests/Checkuser/2008#User:中華國, User:中封四夷, User:天主地主人主, zh:User:李仲连, User:Wikiqebia & User:Ksyrie @ zh.wikipedia。 --CDIP No.150 repair meter 11:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Red X Unrelated w:zh:User:糾正 no apparent connection with Steward requests/Checkuser/2008#User:中華國, User:中封四夷, User:天主地主人主, zh:User:李仲连, User:Wikiqebia & User:Ksyrie @ zh.wikipedia.--Shizhao 01:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
:Shizhao, Please have a check that whether w:zh:User:糾正 and w:User:Dicting have a connection, AND check whether they're peppets of any user or IP of w:zh:Wikipedia:当前的破坏/十字军大屠杀. I believe they're absolutely peppets.--1j1z2 10:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From 1j1z2's talk page I know that sombody proposed to check my IP. I have a question, do you judge a person by his identity or by what he or she edits? The Sage Confucius says: “君子不以言举人,不以人废言” (不因人废言,不因言废人,Do not reject saying just because you dislike the speaker, and do not reject a person just because you dislike what he or she said.). what's the related policy of Wikipedia? My opinion is that everyone is equal to edit the encyclopedia which claims itself to be free, open, and with neutral point of view, and even a criminal should be granted equal opportunities to edit the encyclopedia. It should be very prudential to charge and confirm a person to be a user that vandalizes the encyclopedia. I've checked many of the above users, how can you say they were vandalizing the wikipedia? It seems that your only motivation is that they have different views with you, and against yours, and you tie up to prosecute them as pagans: cut their throats and throw them out of the so called open and neutral wikipedia. -Dicting 14:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To speak out my feeling frankly, you guys disgust me. --Dicting 17:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Checkuser

(The above is a backup of some content of the page which has been blocked in Chinese version)


3RR[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Goguryeo. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Caspian blue (talk) 02:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks for telling me this! -Dicting (talk) 02:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


It seems apparent from your comments and actions that you are overly concerned about these articles. When I find myself getting stressed out over an article, I take a break and go do something else. Perhaps it is time you took a break from it and go to some other article and just have fun editing on Wikipedia. Take a look at Wikipedia:Don't be a fanatic from time to time. Remember that Wikipedia exists because people enjoy creating and editing articles. When it stops being enjoyable, we stop editing, and that's not good. So take a break ... you can always come back to this later. Truthanado (talk) 03:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have an idea for you. If you can find many books that talk about Gaogouli County and that make it notable, I suggest that you work on a section on Gaogouli County in the Xuantu Commandery article, and then after you make that section very long, then talk to the other editors about making it a separate article. Then everyone will be happy, I think. right now, Xuantu Commandery is a short article. Coppertwig (talk) 16:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You violation of WP:3RR policy is reported to WP:AN3. Regards.--Caspian blue (talk) 11:36, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 24 hours. Tiptoety talk 17:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your inappropriate comments at Talk:Gaogouli_County[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Talk:Gaogouli_County. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Caspian blue. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You comments are not to generate a discussion but just to insult Koreans. Be very careful about your usage of language. You already got a pretty present from Chinese Wikipedia. Learn the lesson from the valuable experiences and do not push your agenda with your insults. That only causes you a trouble.--Caspian blue (talk) 07:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got impressions from bbs that South Korean history book tells Koreans that Gaogouli people is the ancestor of Korean and Gaogouli state is the hisotry of Korea, not the hisotry of China. So I took your opinion and motiviation as the whole Koreans. But that's not correct, I think now. So if I have harmed any unrelated koreans, I say sorry to them. Thanks for your reminding. But I warn you again, do not attempt to obliterate the article. -Dicting (talk) 07:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Edit warring on Gaogouli County[edit]

I have adjusted this article to make it look at least partially like it is a part of the English Wikipedia by removing most of the Korean language material that is not required at this pedia. I have reverted the redirect because it requires discussion on the talk page. I note that you and another editor are involved in a heated set of edits. I trust that discussion without attack can occur on the talk page - but if not then I will block for edit warring as necessary.--VS talk 11:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. -Dicting (talk) 12:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like he's got it under control, see User_talk:Cydevil38#Edit_warring_on_Gaogouli_County. Bearian (talk) 13:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent complaint about Chinese Wikipedia block[edit]

I recently got a talk from Gediarc mentioning your username right here. When checking zh:Special:Contributions/Jediarc, I could not easily know if vandal occurred without edit summaries. As I am very busy administering 11 Wikimedia wikis and I am less familiar with mediating disputes, I cannot guarantee a quick response to your satisfaction.--Jusjih (talk) 22:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hi, i have some request :[ I love Hanfu, Can you or someone upload some decent Hanfu Picture and improve the "Han Chinese Clothing" artical? please :x it's so cold and blank there xp —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lennlin (talkcontribs) 20:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Dicting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ―Susmuffin Talk 03:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]