User talk:Diametakomisi

Disambiguation link notification for December 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of discoveries by disciplines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calotte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of discoveries by disciplines, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Springer and Kerala school (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of discoveries by disciplines, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Verification and Realization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Communication to a user[edit]

@Clarityfiend: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Writings&diff=prev&oldid=936421547 @ > Latest revision (I used copy of your criticism) Diametakomisi (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of psychopathological discoveries moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of psychopathological discoveries, is much oo selective, and seems to concentrate unduly upon one aspect which may not yet really be generally accepted n When you feel the article is sufficiently expanded and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 00:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

okay that's fine thank you Diametakomisi (talk) 00:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of discoveries of dead notable or famous people for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of discoveries of dead notable or famous people is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of discoveries of dead notable or famous people until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of discoveries in geography and geology moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of discoveries in geography and geology, is altogether too sketchy, and the items listed are of very different importance. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 01:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of autopsical findings moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of autopsical findings, is too erratic in coverage for mainspace (that Caesar was killed by a stab wound is very different from the modern celebrity examples ) I dont really see the point of bring this together, but you should at least make it more complex. . When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:07, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

will do thanks Diametakomisi (talk) 14:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of biological discoveries moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of biological discoveries, is very incomplete and has an erratic inclusion of subject the do not even approxiate a list of major biological discoveries. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC) ~~==Speedy deletion nomination of User:Diametakomisi==~~ [reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Diametakomisi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trillion Tree Campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthropogenic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oceanhero.today[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oceanhero.today requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2001:569:BEF0:C700:74AD:5A71:FE34:1839 (talk) 00:39, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multinational (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Project Drawdown 102[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Project Drawdown 102 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. b uidhe 22:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, you may be blocked from editing. Special:Diff/939364015 I had told you Europol is NOT a last name. Matthew hk (talk) 00:34, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

you tell me how the changes are vandalism, you see the source and the content added, there isn't any vandalism there. You are abusing this particular situation Diametakomisi (talk) 00:37, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok it seem you have zero idea on the functions of the Template:cite news parameters as i first warned you. Ok, i missed to tell you for |website= we don't need www in it. Since The Times of Israel is an online newspaper it is better to use |newspaper=. Matthew hk (talk) 00:48, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. So this not scandal https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB110597211289927835 this is not https://www.ft.com/content/75f6c914-273b-11e8-b27e-cc62a39d57a0 and i need to assume good faith on your vandalism on cite para? Special:Diff/939365519 Matthew hk (talk) 00:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: is threatening when the sources are obvious, (as you perhaps are able to discern), Matthew hk cannot write in fluent English Diametakomisi (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

np obvs, thanks Diametakomisi (talk) 01:20, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subject names in infoboxes[edit]

Please stop removing the name from infoboxes. Per our guidline Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes, "An infobox is a panel, usually in the top right of an article, next to the lead section (in the desktop version of Wikipedia), or at the end of the lead section of an article (in the mobile version), that summarizes key features of the page's subject". The name of the subject is clearly a key feature and should not be removed from the infobox. The infoboxes are designed to repeat information from the article. Thanks, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, actually is true yes, but the values were not entered correctly as we both subsequently appreciated Diametakomisi (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

@Diametakomisi: Even there is a typo in a comment by SOMEONE ELSE, we SHOULD NOT fix it. Matthew hk (talk) 10:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China[edit]

Please stop your vandalism. Please read Template:Infobox company document on the correct value of the parameters. |type= should be listed/public/private and NOT legal form. Matthew hk (talk) 08:53, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While for |name=, the legal suffix "Limited" should be included. Here is the quote: The full, legal name of the company, correctly reproducing punctuation and abbreviations or lack thereof.. Matthew hk (talk) 08:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And considered this is the final warning as the issue is almost the same as #Subject names in infoboxes and your vandalism is after you have been warned by The Mirror Cracked for this Special:Diff/939482344. Matthew hk (talk) 09:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you had been warning by The Mirror Cracked in Standard Chartered quoting his edit summary Stop removing the name from infoboxes. Please read WP:INFOBOX "An infobox is a panel... that summarizes key features of the page's subject" The name of the subject is a key feature. Matthew hk (talk) 09:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CSD[edit]

Please stop to create cross namespace redirect:

Matthew hk (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yes, will stop,

thanks, Diametakomisi (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Discoveries in medicine" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Discoveries in medicine. Since you had some involvement with the Discoveries in medicine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

viewed Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 February @ t (time) = ~ Diametakomisi (talk) 14:38, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of members of internet slang classified abbreviations[edit]

The article List of members of internet slang classified abbreviations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

apparent partial dup of [[�Internet Slang]]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 20:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gadfly (philosophy and social science) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CABI

List of banks in Egypt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Banks

National Bank of Egypt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Britain

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of members of internet slang classified abbreviations for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of members of internet slang classified abbreviations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of members of internet slang classified abbreviations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CapnZapp (talk) 10:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gadfly (philosophy and social science), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Copy and Posit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion[edit]

Proposed deletion of Gadfly_(philosophy_and_social_science)[edit]

The article Gadfly_(philosophy_and_social_science) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research. The article knits together a variety of passages in Plato and the Bible in order to develop a novel interpretation of the influence of the gadfly concept. For example, the article claims that Ovid's reference to furor is a development of Plato's "gadfly" idea. In support of this claim, the article cites a chapter by Michael Naas and an article by Michael Erler — neither of which refers to Ovid.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

"American classicists" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect American classicists. Since you had some involvement with the American classicists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. PamD 13:15, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

BP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bloomberg

Gadfly (philosophy and social science) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Enlightenment

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-negotiable" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Non-negotiable. Since you had some involvement with the Non-negotiable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:47, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect reference and citation style[edit]

Hello Diametakomisi, I have noticed some of your edits have included incorrect reference and citation style. I would highly suggest using the RefToolbar to help make all of your citations in one style. If you have any questions please let me know. I will be happy to help out. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:59, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've conformed to Wikipedia:RefToolbar @ asap from 15:59, 29 February 2020 Diametakomisi (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buk missile system, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gadfly and Agat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kristen Stewart‎; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 20:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bianchi classification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Institute for Theoretical Physics

Keira Knightley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Variety

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Crossroads ^-talk- 20:29, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for incompetence and vaguely insulting comments that, if they made sense, would probably be considered personal attacks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA shows "Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to sanctions including blocks or even bans." even if I personally attacked Crossroads outstandingly bad; shocking WP:NPA shows "egregious" which isn't "vaguely insulting comments" & I've already explained that although "I do feel I attacked Crossroads by identifying << lack of reason >>" > "really my response was a reaction to the perceived threat to me by Crossroads - I don't intend to discredit Crossroads" isn't an actual personal attack - it wasn't my intention to attack Crossroads - I was about to write , before you blocked me > "Because Crossroads is interested in the subject, I would be willing to defer to Crossroads as the lead at the article because Crossroads has more authority on the subject" < is not an attack, it wasn't my intention to attack the user, it was just my opinion of the reasons identified by Crossoroads in the discussion - I wanted to work with Crossroads not attack he/she as a user > "really my response was a reaction to the perceived threat to me" no-one else even mentioned they thought I was attacking the user:Crossroads Diametakomisi (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC) (minor correction after signature Diametakomisi (talk) 22:38, 19 March 2020 (UTC))[reply]

@Narky Blert: "is just an assault I think that is all, looking at the evidence, and really he/she should just be arrested by the police not adding comments to this section" - I was trying to communicate my emotion not my actual thoughts on Crossroads - in some way I was reciprocating to Crossroads because he/she wanted to block me, so I felt Crossroads should be stopped, you know like Isaac Newton "every action has an equal and opposite reaction" Diametakomisi (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC) (added url after signature Diametakomisi (talk) 22:37, 19 March 2020 (UTC))[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Diametakomisi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the indefinite block is unnecessary because:

1 I'm willing to disengage from edits and work to clarifying my wording to help others to understand, so that my wording isn't incomprehensible. I agree that my wording might be incomprehensible, but I think that the problem could be addressed by a dialogue with other editors - the problem identified as "incomprehensible" is my lack of consideration (I know as I was writing I was being inconsiderate, so I'll have to choose to be considerate as a personal rule in the future) not because of lack of ability to write comprehensible sentences
2 as I've already stated in this section, I wasn't actually attacking the user - that I thought I was attacking him/her is my opinion, but looking at the evidence @ WP:NPA it isn't possible that my behaviour is "personal attacks". My comments are neither "Repeated" or "egregious" personal attacks which is the policy description given which could lead to sanctions including blocks or even bans. I didn't feel angry towards the user, or hateful, I just was hoping to defend myself user:Crossroads"
3 the response "indefinite" by the blocking editor is too severe considering "could lead to sanctions including" - the user could have chosen sanctions not blocking. It wasn't my intention to harm wikipedia, I didn't exercise sufficient concern for my writing comprehension, which caused the situation with user:Crossroads - I haven't attacked anyone on Talk pages, or in summaries - my comments were made because I hoped to identify a problem with user:Crossroads reasons, not with the user
Diametakomisi (talk) 23:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Regarding #1, you have a mile of talk-page warnings and having your edits undone, but your behavior did not change. Even (per your usertalk) when you said you would stop doing one thing (for example, misuse of a template or ref format), you did more of it or similar elsewhere. I don't see a pattern of constructive contributions, but only disruption (per ANI and my own looking at your edits). "Good intentions" are not sufficient. Neither response #2 nor #3 are anywhere near sufficient. Your comment later here (about being unfair and involving robots and ninjas) clearly demonstrates that you are not able to interact here in a mature-enough and civil manner (relates to item #2). And "indefinite" doesn't mean "infinite", but instead that you need to make a serious effort to learn and demonstrate competence rather than merely allowing a certain time to elapse. DMacks (talk) 16:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I fixed your unblock request for you. You copied the "tlx" code, which disables the template. Also, for what it's worth, guillemets aren't used in English. Using them is just going to confuse English-speakers. At least, I think that's what you're using < and > to mean. It's difficult to tell. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:50, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

okay thanks. yh I'm using guillemets from French wikipedia - I think "quote of source" is different from << highlighted subject, concept, factor identified in discussion, talk, or article >> is the intended use, although I don't know if this is an established use, I did think it would be obvious to the reader Diametakomisi (talk) 15:11, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permalink to ANI report for the reviewing admin. Crossroads ^-talk- 16:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have to say I think it's unfair I have to be made to reason with a robot. How could I be expected to reason with an automaton, so unhuman...the sense of foreboding, it's almost unbearble, and a model Ninja-pirate also - I wonder how this will resolve for me - surely Crossroads you see my point of view Diametakomisi (talk) 16:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC) (correction after signature 16:37, 20 March 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Also note to any reviewing admin in case they missed the one I left at ANI: this account is a sock of Whalestate (and more recently 23h112e). The extremely idiosyncratic editing/discussion style, the overlap in subject area, and the timing of account(s) creation make it pretty certain. I don't know if it's worth bothering with a full-blown SPI at this point, but I thought this should be taken into consideration as well. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the consideration. Life ends for us one day as eternity is impossible at least you all understood something, that robots should win, as humans never will survive eternity. If we all die in ~130 years (the maximum human life-span) , then cremation, the armageddon (at least by fire) occurs periodically at about a ~130 year period - a googleplex years is finished in a blink of an eye compared to eternity, which I am as displeased as as you all are. Your pathetic efforts to dominate they are historical of the species, and stupid, because no-one wins, - I have to accept the United States worthless effort at civility with the same stupid weapon based violence that parades as civility elsewhere, when the situation for the species is simple doom and no hope in truth that is all. As to whether I'm whalestate or not, better to be a whale, than understand, I'm sure. the IPs are the same, except for two which are different to the IPs used by that account 12:55, 3 March 2020 was an edit using a new IP. No need to go Moby, but I guess insanity is a national characteristic : "doomed by a quest for revenge on the white whale" because I am white and pure and you are the bad, sea for yourselves. Diametakomisi (talk) 17:43, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy hunting see if you find me after today - if you like welcome to my ocean Diametakomisi (talk) 17:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of discoveries of writings[edit]

The article List of discoveries of writings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Confusing WP:OR that needs WP:TNT by a user who has been indefinitely blocked for article content issues, and who was likely a sockpuppet anyway, thus being possibly G5 worthy. See this ANI discussion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crossroads ^-talk- 21:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of discoveries in anthropology[edit]

The article List of discoveries in anthropology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Confusing WP:OR that needs WP:TNT by a user who has been indefinitely blocked for article content issues, and who was likely a sockpuppet anyway, thus being possibly G5 worthy. See this ANI discussion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crossroads ^-talk- 21:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of discoveries in anthropology for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of discoveries in anthropology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of discoveries in anthropology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Crossroads ^-talk- 21:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of discoveries of writings for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of discoveries of writings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of discoveries of writings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Crossroads ^-talk- 14:11, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Not secure" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Not secure should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 25#Not secure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 15:06, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of autopsical findings[edit]

Hello, Diametakomisi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of autopsical findings".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:45, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of discoveries in biochemistry[edit]

Hello, Diametakomisi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of discoveries in biochemistry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of discoveries in technology[edit]

Hello, Diametakomisi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of discoveries in technology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of discoveries in geography and geology[edit]

Hello, Diametakomisi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of discoveries in geography and geology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of discoveries in paleoanthropology[edit]

Hello, Diametakomisi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of discoveries in paleoanthropology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of discoveries of fugitives[edit]

Hello, Diametakomisi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of discoveries of fugitives".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:01, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of psychopathological discoveries[edit]

Hello, Diametakomisi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of psychopathological discoveries".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of discoveries in mathematics concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of discoveries in mathematics, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of discoveries in mathematics[edit]

Hello, Diametakomisi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of discoveries in mathematics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of discoveries in pathology[edit]

Hello, Diametakomisi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of discoveries in pathology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of biological discoveries[edit]

Hello, Diametakomisi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of biological discoveries".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]