User talk:Demonkey36

Welcome!

Hello, Demonkey36, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 06:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Just wanted to get some advice on a page where the info/verifiability seems a little fishy, and a lot of the text seems to be the opinion/original research of one person (please correct me if I'm wrong!). The "Working Terrier" page seems to have been defended pretty territorially by its creator whenever citations have been requested or verifiability has been questioned. (Please note that there is another conversation regarding hunting/controversy/animal rights on its Talk page -- this has nothing to do with that issue)

In the Early history section, this sentence jumps out: "...and most histories were invented or dramatically elaborated on by get-rich-quick breed promoters."

Also, I have no clue how exactly which flag should be used for the Rootstock and Tools and technique sections, as they contain issues with verifiability/citation as well as with tone ("What of all of the other Kennel Club breeds of terriers? Most of these terrier were never true working terriers. Some..."

In a nutshell, it looks like this page has had quite the edit war and I just wanted to let somebody know about it (someone who knows more about Wikipedia-specific procedure than I do) :)

Thank you! Demonkey36 (talk) 02:58, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If nothing else has worked, you can go to the edit war noticeboard. However, that's kind of a last resort. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:50, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Demonkey36. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]