User talk:Deffrman

Warning[edit]

You are a sock of 2001:e10:6840:21:20c:6eff:fe07:58e3. And you're definitely edit-warring and I'm reporting you for WP:3RR --Tenebrae (talk) 04:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sock. --Deffrman (talk) 04:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:21, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: pages user. --Deffrman (talk) 04:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

a. --Deffrman (talk) 04:27, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Tenebrae (talk) 04:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36h for edit warring, as you did at Sukhumi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Alex Bakharev (talk) 04:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deffrman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Alex Bakharev: edit warnings pages. --Deffrman (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 04:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

here. --Deffrman (talk) 04:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Deffrman (talk) 04:34, 10 March 2016 (UTC) --Deffrman (talk) 04:38, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

User edits. --Deffrman (talk) 04:41, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock[edit]

User:Deffrman's account has been globally locked due to long-term abuse. See this edit warring report. EdJohnston (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]