User talk:Daveportslade

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Daveportslade, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, including the article Richard William Enraght. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful, and for when you want to learn more about editing Wikipedia:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an active Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Evb-wiki 13:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Enraghtprison.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Enraghtprison.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Richard William Enraght:[edit]

Your recent edit to Richard William Enraght (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 11:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richard William Enraght redux[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Richard William Enraght. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Evb-wiki 14:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Evb-wiki 14:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Evb-wiki 15:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Evb-wiki 19:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking time to improve the article Richard William Enraght and for accepting constructive criticism well. Welcome to Wikipedia. --Evb-wiki 20:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FrEnraghtSSC.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:FrEnraghtPuseySSC.jpg. The copy called Image:FrEnraghtPuseySSC.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 09:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Line Citations[edit]

Well done with Richard William Enraght. He was a real hero of the faith. I can see you are working from legit sources - PLEASE cite them in-line:Wikipedia:Footnotes. If you do this now, it will save much trouble later when put the article up for GA status. Again, it looks great! -- SECisek 17:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mention everything you can cite!!! -- SECisek 00:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richard William Enraght[edit]

I'm hardly an expert in WP's policies and style! My experience comes from looking at GA and FA articles and trying to follow some of the - often contradictory debates - on policies and style. On GA articles I've helped with empty sub-headings were always deleted by those-who-know-better. Yes, I would delete the empty 'See also'. I was more curious about the marriage than offering an opinion about the articles content :-) I think it does add to the article though. It makes him seem ...well...like a 'family man'. Anyway, I like the article. Thank you for having written it. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 22:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image non commercial use[edit]

Hi, please do not upload images that only permit non-commercial or educational use. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with this restriction on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you need further help, please don't hesitate to post on my talk page or to put {{helpme}} followed by your question on this page. -- lucasbfr ^talk 18:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the good old page ;) -- lucasbfr ^talk 19:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beware, apparently you uploaded the file under 2 different licenses. Check that the one that wasn't deleted had the license you wanted ;) -- lucasbfr ^talk 20:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HolyTrinityChurch.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:BordesleyHolyTrinityChurch.jpg. The copy called Image:BordesleyHolyTrinityChurch.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tateblacksheep.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Tatepwra.jpg. The copy called Image:Tatepwra.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you need more info about Richard Enraght?[edit]

Hi! You may have noticed that I put in a minor edit last night concerning Fr. Enraght's children - I am his great-grandaughter and in recently clearing out my parents' paperwork, have found a cache of letters written by and to him, some of which mention his persecution and his reaction to it (I have to say that the bulk of the correspondence deals with his efforts to secure an inheritance in Ireland). We have also found a photograph of him and another of a woman who is presumably his wife, plus pages of a family bible giving the birth dates of his children and also the early history of the Enraght family. I'm new to Wikipedia, so am not sure of the procedure to follow but perhaps it might be possible to get in touch direct? It's a great article - fascinating details that I never knew even from family stories about him. Pamthomas 23:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pam, you can contact me from the email address at the top left hand side of this page under "toolbox" where it says "email this user", regards Dave

How exciting!!! All the way to GA. -- SECisek 22:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enraghtbintreegrave.jpg[edit]

Hi. Could you please provide more detailed source information about this image. Specifically who is "R. Pumfrey", the apparent photographer who took this image? Do you have any proof that he has agreed to license this image under the CC-BY-SA-2.5 license (like a notice on his website to that effect)? Did he send you an e-mail stating it? If so, you will need to forward that e-mail to OTRS for verification. If you do not have or cannot obtain such information quickly, I will have to nominate this image for deletion for lack of verifiable licensing. I'd hate to do that, because it's a nice photo, but we can't keep improperly licensed photos here. I don't believe this would even qualify under "fair use", since Wikipedia's on non-free content usage is even more strict than the U.S. government (and this is a UK gravesite, so that makes things even more complicated, not less). Please understand that this is not an attack against you or your work. It's just something that has to be done to continue keeping Wikipedia a high-quality and legitimate reference source. Thanks! —Willscrlt ( “Talk” ) 12:45, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response and the additional information. I have added the information to the photo and copied pertinent parts of our conversation to the image's talk page to document the details you have provided. Since everything appears fine and the image is freely licensed, I will initiate a move to Wikimedia Commons, the central repository of freely-licensed images. That way it can be used on any of the other language sites or projects. I'm sorry to hear that your friend passed away. He sounds like a good friend, and I'm sure he is missed. If you know the date the photo was taken, please updated the description on File:Enraghtbintreegrave.jpg (or possibly it will be at commons:File:Enraghtbintreegrave.jpg by the time you read this) with that final missing piece of data. Thanks again. —Willscrlt ( “Talk” ) 23:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. The image is now available at commons:File:Enraghtbintreegrave.jpg. It has been tagged for deletion locally, but that is not a problem, because as soon as it is deleted, the Commons version will be used automatically instead. The net effect on the English Wikipedia is no change. However, the image is now available on every other language of Wikipedia (if you wanted to translate Enraght's article into Finnish, German, or Hebrew for example or use the image on the Norfolk article in the Scots language) and any other project (Wikibooks, Wiktionary, Wikiversity, etc.). I'm not saying it will be used in any project other than the English Wikipedia for the two current articles, but it's nice to give people the option. Thank you for sharing the photo under a Creative Commons license. Please review the information on Commons that I included on the photo and talk page, and make any corrections that need correcting (especially the date if you know it, even a month and year is better than nothing). Great job on writing Enraght's article, too. :-) Have a good day! —Willscrlt ( “Talk” ) 00:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Enraghtbintreegrave.jpg[edit]

File:Enraghtbintreegrave.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Enraghtbintreegrave.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Enraghtbintreegrave.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Annunciationbintree.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Realenraght3.jpg[edit]

The file File:Realenraght3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file with no clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Realenraght2.jpg[edit]

The file File:Realenraght2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file with no clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]