User talk:DasGermanMoses

Timestamp for international goals section

Hi there. :-) Is there a particular reason why you removed the timestamp from the international goals section at Milot Rashica or did that happen by mistake? Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 20:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

I like the international goals sections on players' pages to look more uniform to one another so it can be less confusing to other editors. I figured it would be for the best. Sorry about that. DasGermanMoses (User talk:DasGermanMoses) 22:22, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm not against consistency at all but why remove the timestamp? [Edit] I've reinstated it for now. Also, "style="font-size:100%;" is unnecessary code so I've removed it. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domen Črnigoj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daugava Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flix11 (talk) 18:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

non FIFA matches

Non-FIFA matches are included in the players' total balance. Always. For examples matches with Gibraltarin EURO 2016 qualifiers, when Gibraltar was not in FIFA. Wolfgang (talk) 17:07, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Robert Lewandowski So, 3 Non Fifa matches, 7 Non FIFA goals - now demonstrance your sapience. Go! Wolfgang (talk) 17:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Wolfgang: If I may respond (as a page stalker): My understanding is that we count official FIFA matches only for international caps. A discussion at WP:FOOTY from 2016 seems to confirm that. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 17:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Robby.is.on: OK, so please change this here, based on Robert Lewandowski Double standards? Wolfgang (talk) 19:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Wolfgang: More likely inconsistency (due to different editors with differing knowledge) than double standards, I'd say. I've corrected Lewandowski's stats. Cheers, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Robby.is.on: Thanks, but probably not for long. You will see double standards with your own eyes, when your edit will be undone by someone, because you removed Lewandowski's matches from the EURO 2016 qualifying with Gibraltar. They were non-FIFA, but pro-UEFA, and - it's very important - not friendlies. Everyone and always counts them to the balance. Bayern, UEFA, and many serious people and organizations... But not Wikipedia. Wow. You are the smartest. Wolfgang (talk) 21:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Wolfgang: Then perhaps this needs be discussed anew at WP:FOOTY. "Wow. You are the smartest." – What have I done that would justify this antagonistic comment? Robby.is.on (talk) 21:27, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Robby.is.on: You - this word doesn't have equivalent in the plural sector in English. I am, you are, he/she/it is / we are, YOU ARE (I used it), they are. Poor language :) Wolfgang (talk) 07:46, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

@Wolfgang: Mm, okay. :-) Robby.is.on (talk) 13:35, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Meddie Kagere

Your last edition makes the table illegible. Why don't you look at the best tabels? Ronaldo or Lewandowski - there is a legible record. Kagere now has ingelible. Wolfgang (talk) 20:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cornelius Stewart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arnos Vale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:17, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mārcis Ošs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daugava Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of José Otoniel Salinas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Otoniel Salinas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Otoniel Salinas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlameRuiner (talk) 06:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Moana Pito

The article Moana Pito has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 09:25, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fidel Caesar

The article Fidel Caesar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dumy Fédé

The article Dumy Fédé has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 11:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Are you okay?

Hi. I seen you haven't edited since October. Are you okay, DasGermanMoses? Robby.is.on (talk) 08:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ryan Aloali'i Mitchell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Aloali'i Mitchell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Aloali'i Mitchell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--IdiotSavant (talk) 02:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Malik St. Prix for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malik St. Prix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik St. Prix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:08, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Shane Rennie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shane Rennie, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Rennie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Jake Rennie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jake Rennie, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Rennie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Azinho Solomon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azinho Solomon, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azinho Solomon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Cliff Valcin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cliff Valcin, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Valcin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Chavel Cunningham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chavel Cunningham, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chavel Cunningham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Orlando Mitchum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orlando Mitchum, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orlando Mitchum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Tony Kaltak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Kaltak, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Kaltak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Elroy Kuylen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elroy Kuylen, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elroy Kuylen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Standard layout and formatting of career statistics tables

Hi DasGermanMoses. Thanks for adding the international goals table at Novatus Miroshi. Going forward, please use the standard table layout and formatting as outlined at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players. It is the result of past discussions of the community of football editors at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. At Novatus Miroshi, I made the necessary corrections. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 20:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Robby, I have not been on Wikipedia for a while now, so I was not aware of these past discussions. Thank you for informing me of the agreed upon layout. I will be using it for my future edits. DasGermanMoses (talk) 22:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

No problem. Great to have you back! :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

I will be using it for my future edits. When? You didn't at Nicholas Wadada and James Situma…? Robby.is.on (talk) 10:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Sorry. I didn't realize the table style I was different than the one I've been using. I was mostly foccusing on the rowspanning. I'll try my best to get it right. Pleas let me know what else I can do. DasGermanMoses (talk) 09:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Okay, no problem. I'll try to specify the most important differences:

1. There should no separate "International goals" heading; "international" will do.
2. "Scores and results list <country>'s goal tally first" is followed by ", score column indicates score after each <player> goal.'
3. The goal number should not be followed by a full stop.

You can also see the changes I made at Nicholas Wadada here. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)