User talk:Darkedgeblood
Welcome to my talk page[edit]
Feel free to correct me if I edit or publish anything that isn't suitable for wikipedia's guidelines. Darkedgeblood (talk) 23:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Shiro:
- Your following information on deceiving IP rights of Pipilika by Ruhul Amin is wrong. You can check the official announcement from the Shahjalal University in this link:
- https://drive.google.com/file/d/16rLFFXN7Gx4bPSwbTsCPrMZ71t73hBm8/view?usp=drive_link
- If you need more information about the development of Pipilika then you can check this report:
- https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Ulfvz0P3-7Kuyc9DqeriM8S7Wjhc2V2/view?usp=drive_link
- This is my humble request that you make all the changes where you accused me of deceiving about the IP rights of Pipilika. If you want to communicate with me then send email to shajib.sust@gmail.
- -Ruhul Amin Ruhulsbu (talk) 21:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for reaching out. The links provided by you are not credible enough to validate your innocence. The statements of Burhan Uddin and Ahmed Chisty are also not validated; these are just accusations. If this were a legal issue and if the court papers approved you to claim the website as your copyright, only then you would be eligible to request the removal of the alleged copyright claims.
- For further info you can read MOS:LEGAL. Darkedgeblood (talk) 22:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- I do not think so. Rather than the link shared by me, look into the document written clearly in the pad of CSE SUST department and was signed by the chair. You can reach out to the department as mentioned in the document. As the document was prepared by the executive committee of SUST, there is no reason to involve court as this point. And I do not think you can put your own prejudice based on some medium links. My documents are much more credible then the documents provided by Burhan. I hope you understand the point.
- -Ruhul 150.108.64.133 (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Again, SUST or any other educational organizations are not a legal body. They are not credible or authorized by any government officials to fact-check and disprove accusations. You have to bring court papers to confirm the accusations wrong, and these are just mere accusations. Neither I nor Wikipedia is confirming the accusations; you can bring counter-accusations, which are also valid. Darkedgeblood (talk) 22:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Who approved the accusations? Humor me.
- -Ruhul Ruhulsbu (talk) 23:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you are not sure of accusations, then you are promoting misinformation. Moreover, the source you provided from Medium is not verified.
- Spreading misinformation is not legal as per standard of Wikipedia.
- -Ruhul Ruhulsbu (talk) 00:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dear user, you are misinterpreting between misinformation and allegation. It is the person who has been accused to confirm whether their accusations are valid or not, which that person can do through legal proceedings. Accusations are not proof; they can be either true or false. You can check Wikipedia:ARBGUIDE for further clarification. Darkedgeblood (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Again, SUST or any other educational organizations are not a legal body. They are not credible or authorized by any government officials to fact-check and disprove accusations. You have to bring court papers to confirm the accusations wrong, and these are just mere accusations. Neither I nor Wikipedia is confirming the accusations; you can bring counter-accusations, which are also valid. Darkedgeblood (talk) 22:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024[edit]
Your edit to Jude Bellingham has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC)