User talk:Dannycas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Galicia[edit]

Recently WikiProject Galicia has been created. Perhaps you are interested in joining us to help improving Galicia articles in English Wikipedia. Also a category for . --Stoni(talk) 14:18, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aranga[edit]

Why did you remove the category- municipalities of Spain? Although it is a part of Galicia, it is also part of Spain.--Adam (talk) 18:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spain[edit]

Thanks for putting the new templates on the articles I started. It will be easier for me to find the articles to translate and put on the English wiki. I translate them from Portuguese.--Adam (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Imaxes de situación dos concellos galegos[edit]

  • Ola son Prevert da wikipedia en galego, lendo unha mensaxe nunha páxina de discusión vin que preguntabas porque algunhas imaxes da situación dos concellos galegos funcionaban e outras non, a razón é que aínda nos faltan por subir algunhas imaxes a commons. En commons:Category:Maps of Galicia podes atopar enlaces as categorías das catro provincias galegas e comprobar que imaxes están dispoñibles e cales non. Grazas por axudarnos no proxecto galego. Un cordial saúdo. --Prevert 12:47, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hoxe subín un par delas máis, en próximso días comtinuarei. Por certo penso que hai un problema cos enderezos das imaxes nalgunhas infobox, pon Situacion Nomedoconcello.PNG e así non se amosa. O enderezo da imaxe tería que incluir o guión baixo no medio Situacion_Nomedoconcello.PNG. Un cordial saúdo. --Prevert 20:10, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

History of galicia[edit]

Estoy algo cansado asi que mejor te escribo en castellano. He estado trabajando y/o reescribiendo el articulo de History of Galicia y cree tambien un articulo llamado Celtic Gallaecia el cual abarca bastante de la cultura Castrexa, podrias hecharles un ojo y nos podemos poner de acuerdo para estar escribiendo los articulos historicos?

Saludos. Jfreyre 03:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno dado el precedente, pues sigo en español,ya que me resulta infinitamente más sencillo. Bueno como te comenté con anterioridad me he dado a la tarea de empezar a escribir, traducir y subir imagenes referentes a la historia de galicia.

Prehistoria[edit]

Referente a la Prehistoria no tenemos absolutamete nada, por lo cual resultaria conveniente traducir y ampliar el articulo:

http://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalitismo_en_Galicia

Por otro lado quizas serìa conveniente crear un articulo referente a la edad de bronce en galicia para que nuestra serie de articulos posean continuidad historica.

Celtas y Cultura Castrexa[edit]

Si bien en este momento tenemos algunos articulos referentes al tema seria conveniente unir los articulos de Castro y Cultura Castrexa, al igual que expandirlos usando como base el articulo de Hillforts y su contraparte en la galipedia:

http://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castro_%28poboado%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillfort

Por otro lado tenemos nuevamente el articulo Celltic Gallaecia el cual deberia surgir de nexo para todos los subitems que vayamos generando alrededor del tema.

Roman Gallaecia[edit]

He subido unos mapas, aunque hay que ampliar las incursiones romanas en galicia antes de que formase parte de hispania. ie: la incursion de julio cesar etc.

Hay otros puntos que deberiamos cubrir pero con eso tenems suficiente por ahora

Saludos y que pases un muy feliz año!!! Jfreyre 15:21, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your welcome, Dannycas. I appreciate it. Mayhaps we shall encounter each other sometime during our journeys in this free encyclopedia. Adamantium Guy 21:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There[edit]

Hi mine friend, I've been busy so i'm not been working on the galician project, but I think we have to do something with the Kingdom of Galicia Article and the suevi article. Jfreyre

Sobretodo en el articulo del reino de galicia, mi punto es el siguiente tal como aparece en el articulo no se respetan los periodos historicos y podria pensarse que el reino de galicia y portugal es una continuacion directa del reino de los Suevos cosa que es completamente incorrecta, por otro lado me gustaria poder mostrar de forma mas clara el devenir normal de la región durante a edad media, sin embargo no he tenido el tiempo, sin embargo si he estado actualizando un timeline con fechas y ciertos sucesos que podrian ayudarnos a redactar algo, por otro lado habia etsado haciendo un mapa de la repoblacion por parte de los reyes asturianos de las regiones de galicia y dl sur de león una vez que fueron recuperados de los moros.

Quizas tambien seria conveniente hablar un poco de la incidencia que tuvo que la nobleza gallega apoyara al bando perdedor en la sucesion española y las consecuencias que tuvo para la region, al igual que tratr de ver si colocamos algo de la edad moderna que la tenemos competamente vacia.

bueno me depsido por ahora saludos. Jfreyre

Image copyright problem with Image:Costadamorte.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Costadamorte.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 04:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Covelo_Shield.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Covelo_Shield.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 04:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Riasbaixas.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Riasbaixas.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 03:48, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension bridge[edit]

Your removal (26 Jan) of non-existant image links completed the previous anon vandalism of 28 min earlier - Leonard G. 03:21, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What was really strange to me was that not only did the deletion "stick" until I noticed it (I was looking for the red bridge image), the fifteen intermediate edits ultimately changed only a few words in two paragraphs! There is an easy way to revert quickly, by the way. Need info? Leonard G. 01:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How to revert a page:

First, check the history. You can view complete pages by clicking on the date. (Note that the page and the talk page have separate histories). To view a complete page at a point in time click on the date. To detect what was changed, select the left side radiobuttons and then use the button Compare selected versions.

Case 1: Revert a vandalized page. Select valid version's date. When the page comes up, select edit this page at the top. You will see a warning that you are editing an out-of-date version. Use the Save page button at the bottom. OK through any additional out of date warnings to save this original version.

Case 2: Revert to an earlier version which was edited legitimately after the vandalism. Apply Case 1, then compare the immediately preceding version with the one you just restored. This will show the paragraphs to be restored. Open both the new and the preceding versions for edit and copy and paste the changed paragraphs.

Beware: Someone with intent to delete paragraphs with intent to obscure facts of the article may bury a deletion within a series of legitimate edits - I saw this in Oil refinery, with six or seven edits covering the anon deletion of an entire paragraph (environmental concerns) that was not favorable to the industry - probably some marketing VP at an oil company.

You may want to put on your watchlist articles that you are familiar with. Also, checking the edit "diff" for the last edit is not enough as it may appear OK, with vandalism preceding. Always use the history. Also note that a vandal can register and vandalize with other than an IP address, so it is a good idea to check.

I stopped chasing vandals in real time and am reducing my watchlist. Now, I just cycle through specific articles and checking between my previous edit and the current state. Mark the article with some trivial edit for your next time through. So I might not review an article for a long while but keep up with changes.

Best wishes, Leonard.

NJ Collaboration of the Week[edit]

Thanks for participating in Wikiproject New Jersey. In an attempt to create articles for some of the non-existing pages related to New Jersey, NJCOTW was recently created to bring members of WP:NJ together to work collaboratively on a certain selected topic, which this week is List of Governors of New Jersey. Please help by nominating/voting/commenting on articles on WP:NJCOTW, or by helping to improve articles in the scope of the topic for the NJCOTW. AndyZ 00:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Situacion Boqueixón.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Situacion Boqueixón.PNG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 23:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oratory[edit]

Hi,

Thanks for starting the Oratory page; I've been meening to get around to it for a while. Oratory is actually not an Oratorian school, though based on some old NY Times ads it may have been somehow connected around 1913 or so (Steve Fava and I have done a fair amount of research into the history of Oratory). Liamdaly620 15:50, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I graduated from Oratory in '01... which was long enough ago that when I go back to visit I don't know half the teachers anymore, and a lot of the good ones are gone Liamdaly620 18:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fazenda Typo[edit]

Thank you for finding that error in my artice. The "186" refers to the year 1896, though I accidentaly left out the "9". Thank you agains for finding thast error, and if you find any error with any of my other edits, you can leave a message on my talk page. If you need any other atricles to be edited, or you would like me to write a new article, again just leave me a message. Thanks, Thetruthbelow 16:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help[edit]

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Rome was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.
Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 01:42, 10 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Fair use problem with Image:PonteBurgoPontevedra.jpg[edit]

I notice you uploaded the image Image:PonteBurgoPontevedra.jpg with the {{web-screenshot}} fair use image tag. However, it appears that this tag is totally unrelated to the content of the image, and as a result it may qualify for speedy deletion. Image:PonteBurgoPontevedra.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why Image:PonteBurgoPontevedra.jpg can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the {{web-screenshot}} tag that you have placed on it with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can reupload it but please ensure you place the correct tag on it. However, you must not remove the speedy deletion notice. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --cohesion 05:14, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall uploading the image File:PonteBurgoPontevedra.jpg. It's deleted already though. Nothing else to do, just thought you should know.--the Dannycas 15:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem :) - cohesion 23:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Please help on William Shakespeare[edit]

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week William Shakespeare was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by PruneauT 01:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID maintenance team.[reply]

Panzer Dragoon[edit]

I can't speak for Panzer Dragoon or Zwei (although my understanding is that they had no save system) but Saga definitely has a save system, although I don't offhand know how many blocks it takes up and it's too late now to fire up the Saturn and take a look. As for Orta I have no idea at all; I don't like that at all, and don't consider it canon. I'll find out for you how many blocks PDS needs in the morning. ThomasWinwood(tc) 00:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mitch Hedberg[edit]

I think you might have jumped the gun with the semiprotect, I can't see any vandalism in the recent history. Sure, there have been a couple of superfluous and inaccurate postings but not vandalism. There have even been a couple of useful anon postings. I'm all for using page protection, I applied it to Frederico Chaves Guedes a few days ago, but that really was for a blizzard of vandalism and total nonsense. Mitch probably doesn't need to be protected for longer than a couple of days, do you agree? Nice one, Deizio talk 12:16, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you execute the semi-protect correctly? An anon just edited it. Deizio talk 22:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Improvement Drive (WP:AID)[edit]

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Epic of Gilgamesh was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Spanish architecture, nominada para Wikipedia: Collaboration of the week[edit]

¡Hola!, te escribo porque he visto tu nombre en en Wikiproject Spain. Acabo de nominar Spanish architecture para WP:CotW, es muy triste que no haya nada escrito sobre el tema... Tu voto a la candidatura sería de gran ayuda. ¡Gracias por anticipado! Un saludo,--Garcilaso 13:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

gl:Wikipedia:Imaxe da Semana/35 2006[edit]

Ola Dannycas. Unha das túas imaxes foi seleccionada como Imaxe da semana na Galipedia (aparecerá a próxima semana). Permitinme a licenza de recortala para eliminar un punto luminoso á esquerda que, ó meu parecer, desviaba o centro de atención. Preciosa foto. Un cordial saúdo --Lmbuga Commons - Galipedia 19:22 in Spain, 22 agosto 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:Betanzos Shield.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 12:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Abegondo_Shield.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Abegondo_Shield.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:53, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ames_Shield.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ames_Shield.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Arzúa_Shield.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arzúa_Shield.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fillosdegalicia.gif[edit]

Hello, Dannycas. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Fillosdegalicia.gif) was found at the following location: User:Dannycas/Draft. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey advisory[edit]

The WikiProject New Jersey Reboot

Help Wanted! Articles are languishing, categories are stagnating, assessments are missing, the portal is static, and you can help.

You are cordially invited to visit the redesigned WikiProject New Jersey and invite others to do the same.

You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. You can remove yourself from the mailing list here.

  • Notice delivery by xenobot 01:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (August 2008)[edit]

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 18:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (September 2008)[edit]

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 16:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (October 2008)[edit]

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WikiProject New Jersey[edit]

Hi, Dannycas, User:Nightscream and I had a disagreement over certain parts of NJ municipality articles; because the discussion could potentially affect hundreds of articles, we decided to bring the discussion to WikiProject New Jersey. I would value your input in the discussion, which you can find here. Thanks, A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (November 2009)[edit]

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 14:05, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (January 2010)[edit]

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:46, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Hi! I was born in New Jersey as well, and I am of Galician ancestry! so do you know the language or not at all? AJona1992 (talk) 17:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I never been outside of the United States but my grandmother told me that my family originated from Galicia, Spain so I was fasinted and wanted to know more about our culture. I only the English language and limit Arabic language. Do you accept translation request? AJona1992 (talk) 03:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I was wondering if you can do a Galician Selena page? AJona1992 (talk) 22:28, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, so are you fluent in the language? AJona1992 (talk) 20:37, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for creating the Galician Selena wiki page! AJona1992 (talk) 22:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Díaz Pardo[edit]

Someone just created Isaac Díaz Pardo, and I noticed that it's also on the Galician Wikipedia. Would you possibly be able to assist in the translation?—Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 19:14, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library![edit]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
Hi Dannycas! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 23:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Galicia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amada García, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabanas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Dannycas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dannycas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dannycas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Dannycas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dannycas&oldid=1086370623"