User talk:Cyberguru

Welcome!

Hello, Cyberguru, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! NickelShoe (Talk) 19:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sadhu Photo Gallery[edit]

This problem concerns the Sadhu article.

My Sadhu Photo Gallery - containing more than 500 sadhu photos (thus the largest organized collection available on the web up to date) - has been removed twice by you (Ism_schism) and marked as spam as can be seen it in the Sadhu Article History page:

15:42, 17 September 2008 Ism schism (Talk | contribs) (13,050 bytes) (→External links: rm spam) (undo) 
11:15, 14 August 2008 Ism schism (Talk | contribs) (12,972 bytes) (restore deleted section) (undo)

The Sadhu Photo Gallery is definitely NOT SPAM, but THE LARGEST COLLECTION OF SADHU PHOTOS AVAILABLE ON THE NET. I want to know WHY you not accept it as an External Link !!!???

Please study WP:DR if you must and place my link back. I will wait for an answer for the next 5 days, before I do it myself. But this should not resort in an Edit war.

Thank you for your cooperation! (Cyberguru)

Reply Because, it is SPAM. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 01:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply You have not studied the Dispute Resolution (See:WP:DR) and thus I will not accept this as an appropriate answer. A Photo Collection of the given subject is not SPAM. You should study the Wikipedia Spam (WP:LINKSPAM) and External Links (WP:LINKS) definitions. The Sadhu Photo Gallery falls under "Links to be considered" no.1. cited: "For albums, movies, books, and other creative works, links to professional reviews." (See: WP:ELMAYBE) If you insist on deletion we should request for comments. (See:WP:RFC) I think you should be a bit more precise and cooperate. Thank you! Cyberguru (talk) 03:00, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberguru[edit]

Cyberguru has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this term might not be significant enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so. Remember, however, that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so articles about the meanings and usages of terms are not appropriate either.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you put a lot of work into that! Basically, if no one thinks it still needs to be deleted, the article will remain part of the encyclopedia for everyone to work on. If someone thinks it does need deleted, then it'll be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, which is a five day discussion about whether the article meets Wikipedia guidelines for inclusion. Any article can be nominated for deletion at any time, so you'll never really know. NickelShoe (Talk) 20:21, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Extraterrestrial energyzoa theory[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Extraterrestrial energyzoa theory, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. howcheng {chat} 18:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

be more specific with page numbers in the books you references if you can (:O) -Nima Baghaei ^{talk · cont} 18:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it may get deleted, most of the people are voting delete, I suggest making a copy of the article's coding so when it becomes more accepted in the paranormal community, you can bring it back with new citations ... I could even create a subpage in your user page if you want so that it contains the article so in the future you can bring it back with news citation, etc... (:O) -Nima Baghaei ^{talk · cont · email} 21:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Created a subpage for you User:Cyberguru/etzh (:O) -Nima Baghaei ^{talk · cont · email} 14:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Uforod.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Uforod.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Core desat 05:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Uforod2.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Uforod2.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again.

Coredesat 05:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AmoebaCritter.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:AmoebaCritter.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again.

Coredesat 05:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Uforod3.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Uforod3.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again.

Coredesat 05:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 11:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Saya gynoid.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Saya gynoid.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright policy[edit]

Your addition to Saya, Gynoid has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 14:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]