User talk:Cybercreep1232

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Criticism of Wikipedia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn talk 03:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Criticism of Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SunDawn talk 03:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. jp×g 03:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Reliability of Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. jp×g 04:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Criticism of Wikipedia. jp×g 04:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]