User talk:CyberSongs

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Again, welcome! —Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs

Systems Design[edit]

Belief is the first prerequisite to any functional design. Therefore, if you don't believe the designer and his intentions, his training and background, it is more than likely you will also not believe in either the design nor its realisation.

Respect is the primary criterion of the Artist Designer. Whether it be the artwork upon which all design is based, or the life and accomplishments of the Artist himself, lack of respect is the one thing that will not be tolerated by any Artist/Designer.

Belief and Respect, therefore, are paramount in the designer's mind regarding collaboration and teaching. Lacking either of these two is sufficient grounds for the aboriginal Author of such designs to dismiss the persona of would be colleagues without further evaluation for project participation and discussion.

Such dismissal will be without warning and without explanation. The reason for this is purely professional; there is no time to sidetrack a project with personal precepts. Research Projects have budgets and deadlines which do not allow for such interference. Often these budgets are massive and the deadlines are short. Therefore, a professional research designer will find it more expedient and less costly to simply dismiss the candidate, rather than waste both time and money on what was, from the start, a useless relationship for all concerned.

Whether a project assiociated with some of the world's finest research institutions, such as CERN in Switzerland, or a newborn and as yet unfunded field, there is no time and money to be wasted on things that are not professional and therefore do not apply to the project at hand.

These are words of good advice to would-be research scientists and scholars.

What on earth, or in the universe, is this about?

I agree, I have not been shown respect and that bothers me little, since I am right and mathematics and the Calculus prove it; this really has brought a lot of unwarranted dismissal from numerous quarters in academia and the Nobel committee, but NASA agrees with me, just as they did with the design of the B7800/B7900/MODIII systems which I designed and made work, for places like Cern. With only $200,000,000.00 and 2,000 employees under me. It was quite a job, but the resulting proof of Nu=CG [this "IS" the Unified Field Equation Authored by me] was far more important even than the World's Largest & Fastest Commercial Computer System.

The lack of respect that I get is actually trivial compared to the results.

CyberSongs 13:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)CyberSongs & Terry James[reply]

hi[edit]

i read the content you added on the discussion page of universe. yes, i do also think that these theories are not 100% correct but see these all are discoveries and discoveries need to be refined. till date there no such discovery which is absolutely correct. agreed that these theories don't gave us the answer how matter has originated but these theories are actually based on different phenomenas like the big bang.. this theory is actually accepted worldwide because cold faint radiations are coming evenly from all directions. hope so you have got my point. if you do have any problem then please feel free to contact me.

thanks Sushant gupta 13:46, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My work is not a theory; it is a mathematical fact.

The Big Bang is a theory, Einstein's equation is a law, my equation is a law.

Once upon a time the world accepted the theory that the world was flat and the earth was the center of the solar system and universe.

Galileo nearly lost his head for proving those two theories false.

I'm in good company.

Hi[edit]

Hi!!!

I was talking about the content you added on the discussion page of article universe.

This is Sushant. May I know what is your theory? Well, I am just a 14 years old kid but I would glad to know all about it, although I don't know much in the field of astronomy but do keep a keen interest in this.

Finally, when you leave messages on talk pages, please sign them using either the four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking the signature button on the toolbar (between red X and the line). It will help me identify easier who wrote the message and I can reply easier.

Thankyou Sushant gupta 12:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find it easier to reply here because I can't find anyting here which allows me to quote you within the link to your name.

--CyberSongs 19:50, 16 October 2006 (UTC) Here is the equation and some explanation: The real Unified Field Equation[reply]

--CyberSongs 19:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NLT[edit]

no legal threats is one of our core principles. Please make a revert of your comments made here. Thanks.--MONGO 06:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your threats. It is a very important policy, and if you violate it again you will be blocked.--Konst.able 06:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see our No personal attacks (not acceptable) and No original research policies.--Konst.able 06:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one causing problems here.

You have personally attacked me, you have called me a liar and deemed my work an hoax.

Outside of the wikipedia site you have no authority whatsoever to impose such one-sided rules.

And you have just threatened me with blocking, which, I suppose, means being banned from the site.

However, you cannot stop me from publishing anything I want in the United States of America and so I will publish what I will regardless of your threats.

Someone should advise you of the law regarding not-for-profit sites and the federal rules of conduct.

--CyberSongs 06:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may publish anything you like outside of wikipedia. Inside of wikipedia, however, there are rules however. One of them is "Be Bold." And you are already aware of the "No Legal threats" rule. Below is a standard template that has links you can use to be a productive editor. Thanks! Tbeatty 07:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: I have never attacked you, nor called your work a hoax (someone else used the word "hoax" and there was a very big word "possibly" in front of it). You may publish what you want, but Wikipedia is not a free webhost. I do not care much about American law either. Now, stop making legal threats immediately or you will be blocked. Consider this your final warning.--Konst.able 08:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)[edit]

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here!--Tbeatty 07:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]