User talk:Cs-wolves/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 20

P:CE/S - Yok?

Hi Craig

Have you abandoned this page or just suffer from Hogmanay hang-over?--Nitsansh (talk) 06:54, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Terribly sorry for changing your name...--Nitsansh (talk) 17:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (December)

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Formula One at 19:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC).

Cycling articles

OK. Do you see a problem with my removing the deletion-tags about which I was talking?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Re Puccio page. Wasnt a copy vio. If you check the dates the bio was updated by me prior to sky updating the information on their website. I was given a copy of his bio in advance to flesh out his page. In future I will reword things. Dimspace (talk) 12:47, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
No worries at all. Hadnt taken offence.. DIdnt read it like that at all. Just wanted to clarify. I will be doing a fair bit of sky related wiki edits this year (did loads last year but kept forgetting to log in). Dave Dimspace (talk) 15:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Looks like User:Catfish Jim and the soapdish beat me to it.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Good or bad moves?

There are a couple of page moves logged in Special:Contributions/Leandrokillers on 2nd Jan - are these OK - not my field! User is currently blocked (again), I do like to check blocked users edits if they request unblock.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for looking. I'll suppose we'll just leave it as it is for now. Hopefully he will discuss future edits before blanking them out... Maybe...  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Template:First Class County Matches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 19:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

about P:CE/S...

Hi, why nobody updates anymore this portal ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.47.104.39 (talk) 22:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Odd page swap attempt?

2011 MotoGP Season - bit of bizarre page...! I've protected the redirect. Also created 2012 MotoGP Season and protected - nothing beats a pre-emptive strike :-)  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

WP:NASCAR Newsletter (January 2012)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject NASCAR at 04:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC).

January 2012

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. M D Potter. Any comments? 16:15, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Jaime Alguersuari. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please see WP:CHALLENGED. Epeefleche (talk) 20:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

UCI as source

If you use uci.ch as reference for a team roster, the team roster should include the riders listed on uci.ch. Example: On FDJ-BigMat you have added other confirmed riders, and the reader is led to believe that the source is UCI. Personally I would prefer the team website as reference, because most of the time this is more reliable than uci.ch. --Pirker (talk) 16:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC).

P:CE/S badly miss you...

Hi Craig

Since you no longer edit the portal regularly, it fell into disrepair, or more correctly, lack of mainteinance, which resulted in many results missing in the second half of January (now archived). Is there any chance that your "vacation" will end in the foreseeable future? I hope it's not because I called you by wrong names... (I have no idea where my mind was when I did that...)--Nitsansh (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

2012 WEC entry list

Is the list supposed to be ordered on team name in the end? I split the AF Corse and Larbre entries when updating the list after the ACO's document because I was trying to order the list based on car numbers. It's not our fault that AF Corse and Larbre decided to split their race number choices. :) Vikirad (talk) 17:31, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Standing (Portal:Current events/Sports)

Hello Cs-wolves,
I am a little bit confused. In the last two years I have always added the standings to the equestrian results. In the last months I had not so much time for Portal:Current events/Sports.

Today you revert my edit (rv: end of the competition only.). But the competition is finished, only the series isn't it. --Nordlicht8 (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

The policy has changed, after an editor claimed it is considered non-encyclopedic info, and contradicts the guidelines about notabliity, since such info is short-lived by definition. So it was decided that only final standings should be allowed. The new policy also apply to Test cricket matches, World Cup events, group stage of tournaments, etc. Equestrianism is not alone. Nitsansh (talk) 23:39, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter

The first Monday of the month seems to roll by quicker every time! I'm not aware of any new F1 images that have been uploaded since December (indeed, Category:2012 in Formula One has yet to be created on the Commons), so I think it's best to keep the snowy Eau Rouge image - unless you have any alternatives?--Midgrid(talk) 00:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

OK then, I'll create the new issue and send it out "tomorrow". Oh, and belated congratulations on reaching the 100,000 mark. :) --Midgrid(talk) 00:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Can you do bans?

If so, could you ban IP adress 201.184.17.106. He keeps editing the Nationwide and Truck Series pages and adding in false information of a "TS Motorsports" team with Ricky Carmichael. ThanksGaeaman787 (talk) 15:10, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

This is the ultimate in bullshit pedantic bean-counting

But the clen test came back after the second rest day, July 21. From that day forward is when the slate is wiped. So yellow jersey statistics is not exactly accurate – Contador got two of his six yellow jerseys from the 2010 Tour prior to the second rest day.

I'm not back. I just wanted to take care of 2011 Giro d'Italia. I feel like I'm taking a beloved old dog out back to shoot it between the eyes. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 20:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

OK, I took care of 2011 Giro d'Italia. I'm gonna list it for GA as long as I'm here. The only thing holding it back from GA previously was the Contador resolution (it would have quick-failed if nominated). I'm not gonna dive in and "fix" the stages pages, but if you ever have time (which I tend to doubt...your plate is full!) you might take a look at them. Perhaps how I wrote the stages pages for the 2007 Giro d'Italia could give some way of how to handle this (but..perhaps not, since Petacchi was only in about a half dozen tables, not 15 or so like Contador).
Sad day for our sport, no matter what. Keep up your good work here. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 20:54, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (January)

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Formula One at 20:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC).

2011 Giro d'Italia

I was told to let you know when 2011 Giro d'Italia goes up for GA review. Well, I will be reviewing it this week. InTheAM 18:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Just wanted to drop by and let you know I haven't abandoned the review. It's just taking me some time to get to it this week. Should be done tomorrow sometime. InTheAM 20:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for 2012 24 Hours of Daytona

The DYK project (nominate) 16:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi thanks for the working on the Volta ao Algarve article. I'm still trying to get used to this wikipedia thing :D Squeegiemama (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations

100000 Edits
Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

```Buster Seven Talk 14:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Should we not chop the last three lines off this table? They were put there due to a ref (6) in June last year, but the main ref (28) shows the list as Jan this year and they are not in it! And at this late stage I doubt if they will be...  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:07, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't follow Moto3, you can have that edit - and how come you got a 100,000 edit award? Favouritism? No one gave me one on the 6th Feb! :-)  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Don't start me on edit counters. There are known bugs in the system that give slightly different results in how one phrases the database query - plan to fix = very, very low priority.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:26, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Agreed. He's 5/4on on most bookies. Unless Valentino can pull the rabbit out of the hat...  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

WP:NASCAR Newsletter (February 2012)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject NASCAR at 07:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC).

WPF1 Newsletter (February)

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Formula One at 15:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC).


2012 NASCAR Nationwide Series Season

Hi. Why did you undo my entry? I had everything correct. I know It wasn't finished. I didn't leave it uncorrect. It just needed adding to it. Mjhammerle123 (talk) 07:01, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

That's fine. I didn't know why you changed it. Thanks for explaining. If I had left it incomplete, I could understand what you did. Just didn't know why.Mjhammerle123 (talk) 20:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

F1 lap leaders/race report infoboxes

Hi Cs-wolves. Just a quick note to say thanks for the great work you're doing with the F1 lap leader templates and race report infoboxes. DH85868993 (talk) 04:30, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

For fixing the "double ESPs" in the new F1 2012 results - that's what I get for copy-and-pasting someone else's work without checking it first (or afterwards). Good spot. Cheers! Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

I have to say, yes, by the time I'd watched the race and I was updating the articles, everything was getting a little blurry... Same every year! Yeah, I was quite surprised at how good the race was. I wasn't all that excited this year for some reason, but now I'm looking forward to the rest of the season. I was convinced beforehand that Button would win - shame I'm not a betting man... haha... Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately I couldn't go back to sleep after the race as I had family business to attend to - otherwise I'd have been straight back to bed! Did you watch on Sky? I have to confess that I found a cheeky live stream of the Sky footage on the internet, and watched that. Haha I did notice how Massa continued where he left off - people say it's because he sits so low in the car and can't see the cars around him. Either way, he has a lot of contact. I did think that GP2 looked a little weak this season, and now I see that FR3.5 is really quite a bit stronger. Interesting, that! I wouldn't be surprised if F1 teams are looking more in that direction for the up-and-coming stars. I can see Vettel getting another podium at Sepang, but I predict another McLaren win. Not sure which driver though. Yes, Hamilton looked so down after Melbourne, I was a bit surprised. I wonder if he had a big bet on?! Seemed a little unusual to me, and I wonder if his head is still a bit all over the place, like it was last season. Bretonbanquet (talk) 00:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Haha, great minds think alike. I was really surprised at the quality of the feed online. Who needs to pay money? And exactly, I'd hate to think I was giving Murdoch a single penny of my hard-earned cash. I hope he'd be outraged at our sneaky viewing of his output. Yep, that Ferrari does look hard to drive, and Massa struggles with that kind of car. He's going to have a long season ahead of him at this rate. It seems like our lower formulae go in phases - for a while they're strong, then they really drop off, like now. Hopefully they can come back stronger in a few years. I think F3 is too expensive at the moment - it's supposed to be relatively cheap, but you still need a lottery win to get through a season. No wonder the numbers are low. I'd love to see Button win again, even if it means another tizz for Hamilton. I'm interested in seeing just how stroppy he can get! If Mercedes can get all their ducks in a row, I think both Scumacher and Rosberg can be a threat. And maybe Kimi too. Plus I'd like to see HRT make the grid! Roll on Sunday, and yes, a more civilised hour! Bretonbanquet (talk) 00:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Wow. I thought the Sky figures might be low, and I heard their preview show only managed 600,000 viewers, but only 875,000 for the race? That's terrible, even accounting for the early morning start. I'll be interested in seeing how those figures pan out over the season, especially for those races that are shown live by both channels. F3 at £5-750,000 is outrageous. Last I heard it was £400,000 a few years back, and I thought that was bad enough. I don't know, Scherzinger could probably cheer me up!! Hahah, seriously though, that relationship doesn't seem to be doing Hamilton any favours. Button really has his head screwed on properly these days and that will make the difference between them on track. I'm becoming an HRT fan... do I need a doctor? Bretonbanquet (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Those figures are nothing for Sky to be proud of. If anything, I would expect the earlier races to produce their best viewing figures, and as the novelty of the new channel wears off a bit, the figures will drop. I might be wrong though, haha... I hope Brundle's happy. I agree with you on the Pussycat front - I was unaware of the merits and talents of Ms Wyatt - she looks most accommodating hahahah... we digress. I was one of those Minardi fans! We were few, but mighty. I even turned up to Goodwood one year wearing a Minardi shirt. There were no others like me... yeah, HRT are in Minardi territory, and no worse yet at least. First practice looked bad, but for FP2 they got within 107% - let's hope they qualify! Bretonbanquet (talk) 00:18, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
I really hope the Sky deal collapses. Even though I find I can watch it for free anyway, F1 shouldn't be pay-per-view. Croft is a bit chatty isn't he?! And yes, I noticed that too, how he confused the Sauber and the Williams - that's pretty inexcusable. Even Muddly Talker didn't do that. Much. Haha.. good to see HRT on the grid, though I'm willing to bet that neither car will finish the race. I see Ricardo Teixeira is back in GP2... whatever next? Who is Giancarlo Serenelli and could either of us do a better job? Haha.. enjoy the racing :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 01:54, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

So we were both wrong about HRT! Even though Karthikeyan was in the wars, both cars finished, and I suspect the cooler weather had something to do with that, as both had overheating issues in practice. Onwards and upwards! I thought it was a good race though, apart from the red flag and safety car tedium. Good to see Alonso and Pérez up there - hopefully we'll get a few different winners this season. I'm going to keep my eye on Serenelli. He could be the next... Teixeira. Haha, I like a tryer. It looks like IndyCar for you then, if you're Justin Wilson-sized! You can take on Katherine Legge, and I'll tackle Serenelli and Teixeira ;) Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

I don't think Vettel covered himself in glory with those comments about Karthikeyan. Even if you consider it Karthikeyan's error, it was hardly a gross one. Contrast with Schumacher shrugging his shoulders at how Grosjean spun him around on the first lap. "That's motor racing" etc. I suspect Vettel may be quite a poor loser this year if he continues to lose... I did think Pérez had serious potential, but as always, you never know until they start to prove it in F1. He should go on from here and score more points and perhaps the odd podium, before surely switching to Ferrari. Kobayashi needs to get himself in gear before he's made to look distinctly second-hand! I agree about Alonso too - he seems to be the last driver to crack under pressure. So maybe Serenelli could show up at HRT and score a season full of DNQs? Haha, I'd love to see a return to maybe 15-18 teams and pre-qualifying. I loved that! "Sorry, son, I know it's only Friday morning but your weekend is over." Hahah... Those Indy videos were nice to see, and I hope some demons can slowly be laid to rest. I think that car is nice too! A really striking design. I'd love to see Rubens do well this year. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:49, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
That's how I saw it too - Vettel has a slight habit of cutting back in prematurely, and Karthikeyan was trying to get off the wet kerb. Racing incident for me, but not for Vettel...! I think Grosjean's been a bit unlucky so far, and he'll definitely give Kimi a run for his money. Yes, you're right, sadly - there'll never be that many cars in F1 again, barring major changes in the finances of the sport - but watching the panic of pre-qualifying would be awesome. Look forward to seeing what Rubens can do from midfield tomorrow - his racecraft should get him somewhere, surely. Fingers crossed for him! Bretonbanquet (talk) 18:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

It appears that since the Sports and Recreation heading at WP:GAN got moved down, many articles were forgotten. A three-month wait on a review is rather absurd... At any rate, I have reviewed this article here, and placed it on hold pending resolution of some issues. I see there are a couple other cycling team nominations as well. I'll make no promises on it, but will try to review them over the next few days as well. Regards, Resolute 01:23, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

It's no problem at all. The reviews are half-selfish anyway, as I have two nominations waiting, and several coming up. Clearing the overall backlog helps my articles get their reviews faster!  ;) Resolute 01:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

And the next GA review is up: Talk:2011 Euskaltel-Euskadi season/GA1. Regards, Resolute 21:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

That's a shame. I hate to make you find 30 cites that all say "they sucked". Not even a team website with a listing of results? Resolute 21:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

And Europcar passed. Congrats! Resolute 02:19, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Number three reviewed: Talk:2011 Vacansoleil-DCM season/GA1. Resolute 03:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

WP:NASCAR Newsletter (March 2012)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject NASCAR at 03:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC).

Tom Dillmann

Just doing my usual post-race trawl through the GP2 drivers, and I've seen that you've done a great job on expanding and wikifying Tom Dillmann!--Midgrid(talk) 22:35, 28 March 2012 (UTC)