User talk:Crystalmountainskier
Welcome[edit]
|
Hello,
I noticed your recent edits to ASC, and I was wondering if you had any sources for the recent history? I've heard most of that stuff as well, especially the recent sales and whatnot, but it would be nice to see some sources. Thanks!
-Searles2sels (PJ) 15:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Most of the info was from http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/American-Skiing-Company-Company-History.html
Although I also knew of most of the stuff from previous newspaper articles. By the way my older brother is a senior at Colorado College.
- Cool, thanks for the link. Who's your older bro? I just graduated in May... -Searles2sels (PJ) 15:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Skimap.org[edit]
Hi. I noticed your recent edits to quite a few of the mountains on my watchlist. The project has a policy which says that Wikipedia is not a directory or repository for links. While the website skimap.org seems to have some interesting information, it may not be information that would be immediately helpful to the vast majority of readers of the ski mountain articles to which you're adding links. user:j (aka justen) 18:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, I actually read that policy before I started posting links. I read it to mean there shouldn't be a vast directory of links for each article. Ski trail maps in my opinion fall into Wikipedia's link guidelines that links should be relevant content that is not appropriate for Wikipedia. I disagree with your assertion that historic and current ski maps are not helpful to the majority of ski area article readers. Please let me know what you think. Are you asking that all of those links be deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crystalmountainskier (talk • contribs) 21:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- No, not yet. I wanted to better understand your position. Just as a side note, in the future, you should type four tildes (~~~~) after your comment. Once you save your edit, that'll put your "signature" there. In any event, I agree that current maps are helpful, and that's why we link to the official websites of the mountains, which almost always do have trail maps. On the other hand, historical maps aren't quite as important to most readers, and for those who would like to find that sort of information, Google or DMOZ should be a better resource. Would you agree? user:j (aka justen) 22:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, again. I've asked others for their thoughts on your links here. You may want to comment there. Thanks. user:j (aka justen) 22:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- A bigger issue is that the site you're adding violates copyrights-- see Wikipedia:El#Restrictions_on_linking. It's not enough to say on the site "if you don't want your stuff here, let me know".
- BTW, it's almost always a bad idea to add a particular external link to dozens of articles; it tends to set of folk's spam radar. It also raises questions of the editor's relationship to the site in question (see WP:COI). Better to check first at a project page to get a read on whether the site passes muster before putting in the effort. -- Mwanner | Talk 23:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Per WP:ELNEVER, I've removed the links from each of the articles. user:j (aka justen) 01:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I didn't really think about the copyright issue for that website. I wonder is some of the old maps, from say the '50's fall under the same rules. Anyways, as I was looking through all those articles, I realized there are a lot of links that really don't seem to fit. How are ski lift pictures from skilift.org relevant? In some of the Colorado ski area articles there are a ton of links to reservations websites. Aren't those considered Spam? It seems like people try and sneak links in by only putting them on a few articles and people don't notice Crystalmountainskier (talk) 01:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- I would encourage you to be WP:BOLD and remove any spam you see. If you see a repeated problem, you can mention it at WP:SPAM. Thanks again! Take care. user:j (aka justen) 02:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- To be free of copyright in the US, material must have been published before 1923 (or be published by the federal gov't, or be explicitly public domain). And user:j is right, if you see commercial links, feel free to shoot on sight! Think about it-- if there's one thing that makes Wikipedia really special, it's the (almost) complete lack of marketing. Cheers! -- Mwanner | Talk 17:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Peak 2 Peak Gondola Tower.JPG[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Peak 2 Peak Gondola Tower.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 19:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Peak 2 Peak Gondola Terminal inside.JPG[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Peak 2 Peak Gondola Terminal inside.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 19:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Peak 2 Peak Gondola Tower.JPG[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Peak 2 Peak Gondola Tower.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:31, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Peak 2 Peak Gondola Terminal inside.JPG[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Peak 2 Peak Gondola Terminal inside.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:31, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Peak 2 Peak Terminal.JPG[edit]
Hi, I just wrote an article on Peak 2 Peak Gondola on the German WP and I would very much like to show your beautiful picture there but I have problems: deWP does not allow me to make a link to enWP; both helpers to transfer it to Commons say that the file does not exist in enWP; and I am not competent enough to transfer it to Commons myself. So it would be great if you would transfer it to Commons which might be the easiest way. Thanks from Germany --AHert (talk) 19:33, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Crystal Mountain (Washington)[edit]
Look at the page again pls. You may need to Wikipedia:Bypass your cache..that said would be a good idea to read Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion as i have tag the article for this problem. If others see the page it may get deleted in its current form if not fixed. Moxy (talk) 07:32, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- I have removed the adds ...Could you pls read Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.Moxy (talk) 07:44, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Doppelmayr CTEC.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Doppelmayr CTEC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Powdr Corporation.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Powdr Corporation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:24, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 7[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The START Bus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diesel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Crystalmountainskier. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 5[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jackson Hole Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Eagle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Crystalmountainskier. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Crystalmountainskier. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Crystalmountainskier. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Leitner-Poma.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Leitner-Poma.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Leitner-Poma logo on lift 2009.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 09:57, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |