User talk:CrazyApple1998

Speedy deletion nomination of TheComputerNerd01[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on TheComputerNerd01 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 00:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

Do you mean IWill Date Freddie? It did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. There were no sources or wikilinked articles, so no obvious reason why it was suitable for an encyclopaedia article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:27, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If there are no independent sources, then it's not notable. Also if your evidence is that you saw the TV show, that's WP:OR, sorry Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page Redirected[edit]

Hello, I have redirected a page you created, IWant a World Record, to another page that contained the same or similar content to what you posted. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot and did not delete your page; I merely redirected it. As you will see, most TV show episodes are not covered in an individual article but instead at a season or list of episode page. Also, all articles need third party reliable sources. As Eagles 247 explains well below, I am one of the people around here that looks to make sure New Pages are suitable for inclusion. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 15:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page creations[edit]

Hi, I have redirected several of your articles on Victorious episodes to the main list of episodes. These episodes are not notable by themselves, so please stop creating them. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, we have what is called NewPage patrolling in which newly created articles are listed. I have found your articles there. I did not delete your articles, I merely redirected them to a different article. Please read what I wrote about if you are still confused why they were redirected. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:24, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As to The Simpsons question, I'm not really sure, but I'd have to say that The Simpsons is internationally notable, while Victorious and iCarly are only notable in the US, Canada and the UK. You should ask User:C.Fred about other related questions, as he is very active in the Nickelodeon/television department of Wikipedia, and he could help you out. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected that article, too. Please contact User:C.Fred to find out if individual Nickelodeon episodes are notable or not. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: iCarly & Victorious[edit]

No, individual episodes are not sufficiently notable for their own articles. Details about episodes should go in the articles about the respective seasons. Check other shows in the genre to see how it's done elsewhere—for example, Hannah Montana (season 4). —C.Fred (talk) 00:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Simpsonss1e7.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Simpsonss1e7.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:FreddieBenson.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FreddieBenson.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images and character pages[edit]

Hi again. I have deleted the images you have uploaded, because you are not allowed to just take pictures of an episode as it is a copyright violation. Also, I have re-redirected all the characters pages you created, because, for the most part, these characters are not notable on their own. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you see that? Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per the template, it has to be discussed on the talk page, and only when consensus is reached can separate articles can be created. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on how notable the characters are. The pages you keep creating contain original research only, backed up by no references. Please discuss the split on the talk page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:52, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but consensus has to first be made on the talk page, and I suggest you discuss there before recreating them. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should provide your argument, and back it up. If you can cite Wikipedia's policies, that would be even better, but I do not expect you to know many right now. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just explain your position, and backing it up will come naturally. Don't just say "I support the split," Try to explain why. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Carly-Shay-miranda-cosgrove-6272381-984-6671.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Carly-Shay-miranda-cosgrove-6272381-984-6671.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

The point I'm trying to make is this: Wikipedia can get sued if a copyrighted image is on its website without permission from its owner. The images on this website are mainly taken by its users, or the images are in the public domain. You cannot upload images without permission or licensing information. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but if you take a picture of a picture you did not take yourself, it is still a copyright violation. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, because the image you have taken a picture of is still copyrighted. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Upload what? Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:14, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures taken by the federal government and military are in the public domain. iCarly images are usually not. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't find any copyright information about an image, don't upload it. Unless it specifically says that the image is in the public domain, there is a very good chance it is not. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If it does not contain any copyright info, it is NOT okay for Wikipedia. Images uploaded to Wikipedia have to have licensing information as well as a source of where the image was obtained. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:22, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing is basically the copyright status of an image. Before you upload any image to Wikipedia, please first send me to URL or how you obtained the image so I can OK it. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:33, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean I know a lot about Wikipedia's image policy, then yes. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a very, very, very low chance that you will find non-copyrighted images searching on Google. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:14, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, because you still don't have permission. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:09, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's a trailer produced by Nickelodeon for the show. Seriously, you won't find any non-copyrighted images, so it's not worth your time to look. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He "created" the trailer by using copyrighted clips from the show. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:22, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's perfectly fine. Just make sure you follow the directions at Special:Upload regarding licensing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]