User talk:Commadore Cundo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi Commadore Cundo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 23:36, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Commadore Cundo (talk) 00:42, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/User:Commadore Cundo (February 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 23:35, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Commadore Cundo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 23:35, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me. Still trying to figure out how all this works. I did end up getting that figured out, but would you mind telling me if this is the right way to respond? Commadore Cundo (talk) 05:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @TimtrentAssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 05:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for figuring it out. This mechanism of response is as good as any. As you gain experience you will see how the mechanism of pinning other editors works. It's somewhat arcane, and I can't remember exactly where the help item, on that is. Perhaps @AssumeGoodWraith can remember and help me out?
The thing on Wikipedia is only to submit for review something which is a draft article. I know it's tempting to click the button in the text, but that just sends what is present for review. Please enjoy creating and editing articles. The process ta Wikipedia:Articles for creation will help you, as will reading Help:Your first article. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 09:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Add {{Ping|Username}} to the start of messages, link someone's userpage, or type in a @ when using Discussion Tools (autofills usernames) – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 09:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Timtrent: By the way, I have seen templates and other non articles submitted for review. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 09:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AssumeGoodWraith That is likely to be because new editors have used, but not yet understood, the process of article creation. There are automated tools that place the templates there, bit it is at the editor's discretion to press the button
@Commadore Cundo I have found what I was looking for. It is Help:Notifications. There's a lot to figure out for new editors. I hope you enjoy an intriguing new hobby here FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 10:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Timtrent: I meant people actually submit templates for review. Not the AFC template.
I'm assuming you're talking about the AFC template. "There are automated tools that place the templates there" - quite a coincidence.
And @Commadore Cundo: It is now time to read about the BLP policy, verifiability, notability, spam, vandalism, disruptive editing, edit warring, original research, the neutral point of view, reliable sources, civility, harassment, personal attacks, copyright, article titles, user rights, what Wikipedia is not, the spoilers guideline, the protection policy and the blocking policy. (joke, I swear) – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 10:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing, thank you both for your help! Commadore Cundo (talk) 14:00, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]