User talk:Cominion

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Cominion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 06:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cominion, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Cominion! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eurycoma longifolia[edit]

This concerns the Eurycoma longifolia page that is spammed in a sophisticated manner and protected by Cominion. The sophisticated spam is intended to promote a certain company that prints standardization on their labels.

First two logically wrong references are included. The references claim that for certain herbal medications, there is a wide divergence of quality. These references do not relate to Eurycoma longifolia.

An example for the applied logic is: it has been shown that the quality of saws and drills varies widely, so lets standardize hammers.

Furthermore, glycosaponins are not specific to Eurycoma longifolia but to a huge array af plants. To make claims that glycosaponins would work as a marker to differenciate Eurycoma longifolia from non-Eurycoma longifolia is trickery.

There is a reference to a Malaysian government-approved standardization body, but the page were standardization markers are specified is not in the reference.

The inclusion is spam in scientific lingo. The inclusion has been made to give a certain company based in Eastern Europe a competitive edge.

Readers believe Wikipedia. Feeding them pseudoscientific sales talk should be avoided.

Cheers,

Peter — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.48.124.57 (talk) 06:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I shall try to reply to the best of my knowledge:

"The references claim that for certain herbal medications, there is a wide divergence of quality. These references do not relate to Eurycoma longifolia." The references refer to the use of extract ratios for herbal extracts in general. I believe that all herbs would be subject to this statement, and E. longifolia is a herb.
"Furthermore, glycosaponins are not specific to Eurycoma longifolia but to a huge array af plants. To make claims that glycosaponins would work as a marker to differenciate Eurycoma longifolia from non-Eurycoma longifolia is trickery." I think you're confusing identification techniques with standardization. The section you’re referring isn’t identification of the species, but the methods to quantify the quality of extracts.
:There is a reference to a Malaysian government-approved standardization body, but the page were standardization markers are specified is not in the reference." The full reference is behind a paywall. I have uploaded the necessary page here: [1] Just to clarify, I don't mean that the listed standardization method is the only ways to quantify the quality of E. longifolia. This is only one example, and I think notable enough to be shared on wiki.

I will copy this discussion to the article talk page for posterity. If you wish to discuss further, we can do it there. Cominion (talk) 10:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Persicaria minor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]