User talk:Codeh

%_%error%_%error%_%error%_%

                          %_% 
ALERT              ERROR             ALERT
           CoDe      %_%     CoDe  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yolo13bob (talk • contribs) 16:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Codeh! Thank you for your contributions. I am Abce2 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Abce2 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Edit[edit]

Hello Codeh,

I believe you reverted my change to the article on Pommel Horse. It would seem that you undid the edit because it was "not constructive." I do not understand how this is so because the statement that I omitted was completely wrong. I am personally a gymnast, and a two time national pommel horse champion; I know the event inside out and backwards. The statement I omitted said that you may receive a deduction for not going through a handstand on your dismount, when in reality there are other dismounts such as a russian dismount. In no way was the statement accurate, so I omitted it. Please know what you are doing before you revert an edit.

165.196.142.131 (talk) 16:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, WP:Vada changes too fast for me sometimes. Thanks for reverting.

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Rheumatic fever, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. K6ka (talk | contribs) 18:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, looks like you reverted my reversion of vandalism, but I can see you're acting in good faith. I fixed things up - consider removing the false warning on my talk page. K6ka (talk | contribs) 18:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry about that, WP:Vada changes too fast for me sometimes. Thanks for reverting. Codeh (talk) 18:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Skeleton[edit]

Excuse me, but you are vandalizing the Skeleton article with your added nonsense. Stop it. I'll also report you the same as Poeokop. Golfballtruck (talk) 19:37, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I saw huge blanking of an article and assumed. :x Codeh (talk) 19:43, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing notice[edit]

I removed the notice since you reverted the edit on Cheetos with an "Accidental edit". Thanks. Corkythehornetfan^Talk 03:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

False claims of vandalism[edit]

I notice you were called the edits of User:78.150.147.25 "vandalism". This in incivil. Those edits were not vandalism, as defined by our policy WP:VANDAL. Please do not call or revert as vandalism any edits that do not meet that strict criteria. I would also note that you reverted more than 3 times in a 24 hour period, which could have gotten you blocked. I've unblocked the IP of my own accord. This is being discussed at ANI [1] right now. I would also note that the IP was technically correct in removing that material, as it was unsourced. The WP:BURDEN is on you to provide sources or take it to the talk page. This is true when ANY editor removes unsourced material. Ideally, the IP would use talk or explain it better, but I'm explaining it now. Please don't revert back in without providing sources. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 16:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]