Hello, Classypm! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 22:05, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A features list looks like an advertisement; it is no evidence of notability. If this service/website is actually notable, where are the references to third-party articles about it? All you provided were links to the subject's own website, which is by definition not impartial nor reliable. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, shouldn't the article be tagged for missing references instead of speedy deletion? Not discussing Wikipedia's policy, just wandering. Is there a way I can retrieve the text so I can add the references? Classypm (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
One of the categories for speedy deletion is articles about companies, websites, etc. with no credible assertions of notability (55,000 fans/members on a planet of 7 or 8 billion people is not an assertion of notability, even if that figure were sourced to a reliable third party). --Orange Mike | Talk 19:23, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
