User talk:Clarification12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Clarification12! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! And Adoil Descended (talk) 02:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

3RR[edit]

Your recent editing history at Irredentism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 08:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United Macedonia, you may be blocked from editing. Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 09:36, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United Macedonia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 09:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To ' greek macedonian'- My position is that you are vandalising with your unsubstantiated greek government propaganda against the Republic of Macedonia. Please stop deleting my contributions. You are not providing evidence to support your position.Clarification12 (talk) 09:53, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at United Macedonia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. m.o.p 10:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at United Macedonia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Toddst1 (talk) 13:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ARBMAC[edit]

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANEW[edit]

I've added an additional 24 hours to your block based on the report filed at WP:ANEW about your edit-warring on Irredentism. It seems that all you've done since you've been using this account is POV-pushing and edit-warring. I strongly urge you to reconsider how you edit here once your block expires.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:24, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anew, I was trying to correct clearly inaccurate entries. I asked for evidence to support inaccuate claims, this was not provided. What was wrong with the way was editing?

I'm not ANEW; that's a reference to WP:ANEW. As I already stated, you were edit-warring and your were non-neutral, i.e., pushing a particular point of view. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Bbb23, I'm new to this. Was the other side neutral or present any evidence to support there position? Making the claim that a particular country is irredentist is a serious cliam to make. It shouldn't be made without evidence.Clarification12 (talk) 08:37, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Being new, you should edit cautiously. There is a pattern to your behavior that is disturbing. I would suggest less editing of articles and more discussion of your viewpoint on article talk pages.--Bbb23 (talk) 08:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did actually try to get a discussion going. What options are availble if the talk pages don't yield genuine discussion?Clarification12 (talk) 09:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution mechanisms.--Bbb23 (talk) 09:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]