User talk:Chris Larkin

Welcome!

Hello, Chris Larkin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Oldelpaso 18:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Football AID 3 September – 10 September[edit]

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Spain national football team has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Former Life[edit]

I've seen your name a few times on various Saints related edits. Are you by any chance the same Chris Larkins who once worked for a Life & Pensions Company who shall be nameless and sold me various policies 8-10 years ago? No hard feelings - it's good to see other Saints' supporters on Wikipedia; often I feel as though I'm the only one keeping the faith!

Best wishes. Daemonic Kangaroo 19:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

James Milner Career section[edit]

Not really asking for full feedback on this article (although I wouldn’t mind it). I’d just like to know what you feel the best way the divide up the Career section is, by Club, by season, not at all or some other way. Please leave your reply under the section in my talk page named “Milner Career section”. Buc 16:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anjunadeep[edit]

The article Anjunadeep has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 19:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anjunadeep for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anjunadeep is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjunadeep until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]